Skip to main content

A Rule Extraction for Outsourced Software Project Risk Classification

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 1330 Accesses

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 554))

Abstract

A rule extraction algorithm based on K-means clustering with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets (IVIFS) information, which is the combination of K-means clustering and IVIFS, is proposed in this paper. First, we introduce IVIFS and its distance. Second, we introduce IVIFS method and its application to the classification of software project. Finally, we present a rule extraction model according to IVIFS fuzziness and its K-means clustering, and apply them to pattern classification of outsourced software project risk to demonstrate the advantages of this model. The experimental results show that the rules from IVIFS model are better than that from the conventional K-means clustering model in rule extraction, and the prediction effect from the former is more effective than that from the latter. According to this combinational rule extraction method, based on database from a special and professional investigation for Chinese small and medium software-outsourced enterprise, we obtain some valuable, realistic and available project development risks decision rules.

2016 International Conference on Computer, Communication & Computational Sciences [IC4S 2016]

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Zadeh L. A: Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8, 338–353 (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Atanassov K.: Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 20, 87–96 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Atanassov K.: Interval valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 31, 343–349 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Li D.F., Cheng C.T: New similarity measures of intuitionistic fuzzy sets and applications to pattern recognitions. Pattern Recognition Letters, 23, 221–225 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wang W.Q., Xin X.L: Distances measure between intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Pattern Recognition Letters, 26, 2063–2069 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Xu Z.S: On similarity measures of interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets and their application to pattern recognitions. Journal of Southeast University (English Edition), 23, 139–143 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wei C.P., Wang P., Zhang Y.Z: Entropy, similarity measure of interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets and their applications. Information Sciences, 181, 4273–4286 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wan S.P: Applying interval-value vague set for multi-sensor target recognition. International Journal of Innovative Computing, Information and Control, 7, 955–963 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Xu Z.S: A method based on distance measure for interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy group decision making. Information Sciences, 180, 181–190 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Xu Z.S.: Dynamic intuitionistic fuzzy multiple attribute decision making. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 28, 246–262 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wei G.W: Some geometric aggregation functions and their application to dynamic attribute decision making in intuitionistic fuzzy setting. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, 17, 251–267 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Su Z.X., Chen M.Y., Xia G.P., Wang L: An interactive method for dynamic intuitionistic fuzzy multi-attribute group decision making. Expert Systems with Applications, 38, 15286–15295 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Boehm, B.W.: Software risk management: principles and practices. IEEE Software, 8(1), 32–41 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wallace L., Keil M.: Software project risks and their effect on outcomes. Communications of the ACM, 47(4), 68–73 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Xia W.D., Lee G.: Complexity of information systems development projects: Conceptualization and measurement development. Journal of Management Information Systems, 22(1), 45–84 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Schmidt R., Lyytinen K., Keil M.: Identifying software project risks: An international Delphi study. Journal of Management Information Systems, 17(4), 5–36 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Karolak D.W.: Software Engineering Risk Management. Los Alamitos: IEEE Computer Society Press (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Jiang J.J., Klein G.: An exploration of the relationship between software development process maturity and project performance. Information & Management, 41(3), 279–288 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wallace L., Keil M., Rai A.: Understanding software project risk: A cluster analysis. Information & Management, 42(1), 115–125 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Nidumolu S.: The effect of coordination and uncertainty on software project performance: Residual performance risk as an intervening variable. Information Systems Research, 6(3), 191–219 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hu Y., Mo X.Z., Zhang X.Z., Zeng Y.R., Du J.F. and Xie K.: Intelligent analysis model for outsourced software project risk using constraint-based Bayesian network. Journal of Software, 7(2), 440–449 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hu Y., Zhang X.Z., Nagi E.W.T., Cai R.C., Liu M.: Software project risk analysis using Bayesian networks with causality constraints. Decision Support Systems, 56(12), 439–449 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hu Y., Du J.F., Zhang X.Z., Hao X.L., Nagi E.W.T., Fan M., Liu M.: An integrative framework for intelligent software project risk planning. Decision Support Systems, 55(11), 927–937 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hu Y., Feng B., Mo X.Z., Zhang X.Z., Nagi E.W.T., Fan M., Liu M.: Cost-Sensitive and ensemble-based prediction model for outsourced software project risk prediction. Decision Support Systems, 72(2), 11–23 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ouyang Z.Z., Zhang Z.H., Chen J.Z., Hu Y.: An unsupervised model on outsourcing software projects risks based on T-S fuzzy neural network. Advances in Engineering Research, 13(6), 411–414 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 71271061), Natural Science Projects (No. 2014A030313575, 2016A030313688) and Soft Science funds (No. 2015A070704051, 2015A070703019) and Social Sciences project (No. GD12XGL14) and Education Department Project (No. 2013KJCX0072) of Guangdong Province, Social Sciences funds of Guangzhou (No. 14G41), Team Fund (No. TD1605) and Innovation Project (No. 15T21) and Advanced Education Project (No. 16Z04, GYJYZDA14002) of GDUFS.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhen-hua Zhang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Zhang, Zh., Hu, Y., Xiao, K., Yuan, S., Chen, Z. (2018). A Rule Extraction for Outsourced Software Project Risk Classification. In: Bhatia, S., Mishra, K., Tiwari, S., Singh, V. (eds) Advances in Computer and Computational Sciences. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 554. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3773-3_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3773-3_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-3772-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-3773-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics