Platform Integration and Stationing

  • Gengshen Liu
  • Huajun Li
Chapter
Part of the Springer Tracts in Civil Engineering book series (SPRTRCIENG)

Abstract

There are many kinds of platforms designed to be suitable for the specific working environment. For each platform design, there is a best corresponding platform integration method to make the operation safe and cost effective. Discussions in this chapter present various kinds of platforms and the corresponding integration method options. Through discussions with examples, the history of platform concept development and the corresponding platform installation technology are presented with information in certain depth. For fixed platform and floaters, the most used platform integration method is still by heavy lifting for both modularized topsides and integrated topsides. However, the design and fabrication of massive and heavy integrated topsides make the floatover method a better choice. The conclusion can be drawn from the installation activities of real projects carried out at different time along the offshore industry history.

References

  1. 1.
    Article: Rowan companies marks 50th anniversary of landmark LeTourneau jackup, Drilling Equipment and Technology, Drilling Contractor, 34–36 (2005)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Article: TPG 500 jackup adapted for platform installation and removal. Offshore (2003)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Article: Shah Deniz in full flow following complex platform set-down. Offshore (2007)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ferris, L.D., et al.: Review of the Jack-ups: Safety in Transit (JSIT) Technical Working Group, HSE BOOKS, ISBN 0 7176 2611 3, © Crown copyright 2003Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Manschot, D., et al: “Design and Installation of a Production Jack-up with Storage”. Proceedings of the International Conference the Jack-up platform: design, construction & operation, Sep, 1999, LondonGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Stewart, W.P.: Mat-Supported Jack-Up Foundation On Soft Clay—Overturning Storm Stability, The Jack-Up Platform—September 11th and 12th 2007, LondonGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Presentation: Operation with Jack-up, Total Professeurs Associés. http://www.ugtu.net/sites/default/files/ukh_08_j5_a3_offshore_drilling_with_ju_32s_22_10_14.pdf
  8. 8.
    Poulos, H.G.: Marine Geotechnics. Unwin Hyman, London (1988)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Slangen, F. et al.: An Innovative Self Installing Platform (SIP) Concept, OMAE2011-50342, June, 2011, Rotterdam, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Article: F3-FA Field: A First Gas EPIC. Offshore Ind 4(2), 8–12 (2011)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Article: F3-FA platform is a unique construction. Offshore Holland 01, 5–9 (2011)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pedro, J., et al.: Self-Installing Offshore Platform Investigation of Feasible Structural Design Improvements. University of Lisbon, Lisboa (2014)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Halkyard, J., et al.: A Deep Draft Semisubmersible with a Retractable Heave Plate, OTC 14304, Houston (2002)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Roberts, B., et al.: A Novel Platform for Drilling in Harsh High-Latitude Environments, AADE-07-NTCE-73, American Association of Drilling Engineers (2007)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Xu, Q., et al.: An Introduction to Extendable Draft Platform (EDP), ISOPE, Toulon, France (2004)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gerwick, Ben C., Jr.: Construction of Marine and Offshore Structures, 3rd ed, CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, LLC, USA, UK (2007)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Article: The Statfjord area. Oil and Gas Fields In Norway: Industrial Heritage Plan 176–184Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Article: Shell’s history in Louisiana: 1996–Mars Project, Shell United StateGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Article: Installation date draws near for Mars TLP. Oil Gas J. (1996)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Article: Hibernia—a timeline, Offshore Technology, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Report: Hebron Project Comprehensive Study Report, September (2011)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bradshaw, H., et al.: Hutton TLP Installation, OTC-4913-MS, Houston (1985)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Article: Record 10,000 Tonnes Lift by ALE Heavy Lift in Co-operation with Dubai Drydocks, Heavy Lift SpecialistGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Article: Brazil’s Petrobras Completes Deck Mating on P-55 Platform, Business Guide. Offshore Energy Today (2012)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    News: Mating Ceremony for the “Frigstad Deepwater Rig Alfa” Drilli. The Maritime ExecutiveGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Article: Advances in heavy-lift systems propel deepwater projects. Offshore (2016)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Van den Boom, H.J.J., et al.: Computer analysis of heavy lift operations, OTC 5819, Houston (1988)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Clarke, C., et al.: Structural platform solution for seismic arctic environments–Sakhalin II offshore facilities, OTC -17378-PP, Houston (2005)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    News: Transport and Installation of Piltun-Astokhskoye-B Platform, Posh Terasea, 5 July 2007Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Article: Kikeh—Murphy sets new records for Malaysia’s first deepwater project. Suppl. Oil Gas J. https://nugrohoadi.files.wordpress.com/2008/02/kikeh-malaysia-first-deepwater-project.pdf
  31. 31.
    Report: Offshore Construction and Decommissioning Vessel, Master Marine ASGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Koefoed, A., et al.: “Catamaran for Float-Over Deck Installation”, June 20th, 2002, University of California, Berkeley, Ocean Engineering. (2002). http://scribd-download.com/berkeley-catamaran_58c9f8a8ee34352a77658338_pdf.html

Copyright information

© Science Press, Beijing and Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gengshen Liu
    • 1
  • Huajun Li
    • 2
  1. 1.College of EngineeringOcean University of ChinaQingdaoChina
  2. 2.College of EngineeringOcean University of ChinaQingdaoChina

Personalised recommendations