Advertisement

Sowing the Seeds for Potential Growth

  • Kathleen Smith
Chapter
Part of the Self-Study of Teaching and Teacher Education Practices book series (STEP, volume 18)

Abstract

This chapter explores literature that sheds light on the thinking and action that has traditionally framed approaches to teacher professional development. A review of relevant research highlights the limitations of these practices in terms of producing meaningful teacher learning and sustainable educational change. This carries implications in terms of the effectiveness of such approaches to address the nature of teacher learning – in particular the complex interrelatedness between teaching, thinking, experience, context and action. This chapter then explores an alternative role of the teacher in the learning process by examining three key ideas emerging from literature in the area of professional learning: (1) professional learning must be personal; (2) it must be about noticing; and (3) it inevitably challenges teachers because it involves hard work. This chapter then explores the literature which frames some important considerations around the ownership of expert knowledge, in particular teachers’ professional knowledge of practice and the value and place of this expertise in teacher education. The chapter concludes with a call for more research into the operational conditions conducive to meaningful teacher learning.

Keywords

Professional Development Teacher Education Professional Learning Professional Knowledge Professional Development Programme 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Anders, P., & Richardson, V. (1992). Teacher as game-show host, bookkeeper, or judge? Challenges, contradictions, and consequences of accountability. Teachers College Record, 94(2), 382–396.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, J. R., Greeno, J. G., Reder, L. M., & Simon, H. A. (2000). Perspectives on learning, thinking, and activity. Educational Researcher, 29(11), 11–13. doi: 10.3102/0013189x029004011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Armour, K. M., & Fernandez-Balboa, J.-M. (2001). Connections, pedagogy and professional learning. Teaching Education, 12(1), 103–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ashdown, J. (2002). Professional development as ‘Interference’?: Insights from the reading recovery in-service course. In C. Sugrue & C. Day (Eds.), Developing teachers and teaching practice, international research perspectives (pp. 116–129). London: RoutledgeFalmer.Google Scholar
  5. Ball, S. J. (1997). Good school/bad school: Paradox and fabrication. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 18(3), 317–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ball, D. L., & Cohen, D. K. (1999). Developing practice, developing practitioners: Toward a practice-based theory of professional education. In L. D. Hammond & G. Sykes (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice. San Francisco: Jossey- Bass.Google Scholar
  7. Borko, H., & Putnam, R. T. (1995). Expanding a teacher's knowledge base: A cognitive psychological perspective on professional development. In T. R. Guskey & M. Huberman (Eds.), Professional development in education: New paradigms and practices (pp. 33–66). New York: Teachers College/Columbia University.Google Scholar
  8. Boyd, D. J., Grossman, P. L., Lankford, H., Loeb, S., & Wyckoff, J. (2009). Teacher preparation and student achievement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 31(4), 416–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brookfield, S. D. (1995). Becoming a critically reflective teacher. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  10. Clandinin, D. J. (1985). Classroom practice: Teacher images in action. London: Falmer.Google Scholar
  11. Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (1987). Teachers' personal knowledge: What counts as “personal” in studies of the personal. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 19, 487–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (1992). Teacher as curriculum maker. In P. W. Jackson (Ed.), Handbook of research on curriculum (pp. 363–401). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  13. Cobb, P., & Bowers, J. (1999). Cognitive and situated learning perspectives in theory and practice. Educational Researcher, 28(2), 4–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (1999). The teacher research movement: A decade later. Educational Researcher, 28(7), 15–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Connelly, F. M., & Clandinin, D. J. (1986). On narrative method, personal philosophy and narrative unities in the story of teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 23(3), 293–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). How teacher education matters. Journal of Teacher Education, 51(3), 166–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Darling-Hammond, L., & Richardson, N. (2009). Research review/teacher learning: What matters. Educational Leadership, 66(5), 46–53.Google Scholar
  18. Dewey, J. (1933). How we think. New York: Heath.Google Scholar
  19. Elbaz, F. (1981). The teacher's “practical knowledge”: Report of a case study. Curriculum Inquiry, 11, 43–71.Google Scholar
  20. Elbaz, F. (1983). Teacher thinking: A study of practical knowledge. New York: Nichols Publishing.Google Scholar
  21. Elmore, R. F., & Burney, D. (1997). Investing in teacher learning: Staff development and instructional improvement in community school district# 2. New York City: ERIC.Google Scholar
  22. Fenstermacher, G. D. (1994). The knower and the known: The nature of knowledge in research on teaching. Review of Research in Education, 20, 3–3.Google Scholar
  23. Ferguson, R. F. (1991). Paying for public education: New evidence on how and why money matters. Harvard Journal of Legislation, 28(2), 465–498.Google Scholar
  24. Ferguson, R. F., & Ladd, H. F. (1996). How and why money matters: An analysis of Alabama schools. In H. F. Ladd (Ed.), Holding schools accountable: Performance-based reform in education (pp. 265–298). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  25. Fullan, M. (1982). The meaning of educational change. New York: Teachers College/Columbia University.Google Scholar
  26. Fullan, M. (1993). Change forces: Probing the depths of educational reform. Bristol: Farmer Press.Google Scholar
  27. Greeno, J., Collins, A., & Resnick, L. (1996). Cognition and learning. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 15–46). New York: Macmillan Library Reference USA.Google Scholar
  28. Guskey, T. R. (2009). Closing the knowledge gap on effective professional development. Educational Horizons, 87(4), 224–233.Google Scholar
  29. Hargreaves, A. (1994). Changing teachers, changing times. London: Cassell.Google Scholar
  30. Hargreaves, A., & Shirley, D. (2012). The global fourth way the quest for educational excellence. Australia: Hawker Bronlow Education.Google Scholar
  31. Hiebert, E. H., & Calfee, R. C. (1992). Assessing literacy: From standardised tests to portfolios and performances. In S. J. Samuels & A. E. Farstrup (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction (pp. 70–100). Ann Arbor: University of Michegan: International Reading Association.Google Scholar
  32. Hill, H. C. (2009). Fixing teacher professional development. Phi Delta Kappan, 90(7), 470–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ingvarson, L. C. (2002). Building a learning profession. http://www.acer.edu.au/documents/PolicyBrief3.pdf
  34. Jaworski, B. (1994). Investigating mathematics teaching: A constructivist enquiry. London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  35. Johnston, P. H. (1992a). Constructive evaluation of literate activity. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
  36. Johnston, S. (1992b). A case for the “person” in curriculum deliberation. Paper presented at the Australian Association for Research in Education, Deakin University, Geelong.Google Scholar
  37. Kennedy, M. (1999). Form and substance in mathematics and science professional development. (vol. 3). Madison: National Institute for Science Education.Google Scholar
  38. Knapp, M. (2003). Professional development as a policy pathway. Review of Research in Education, 27, 109–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Korthagen, F. (2001). Changing our view of educational change. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(2), 263–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge university press.Google Scholar
  41. Leinhardt, G. (1988). Situated knowledge and expertise in teaching. In J. Calderhead (Ed.), Teachers’ professional learning (pp. 146–168). London: Falmer.Google Scholar
  42. Lieberman, A. (2000). Networks as learning communities: Shaping the future of teacher development. Journal of Teacher Education, 51(3), 221–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lieberman, A., & Miller, L. E. (2001). Teachers caught in the action: Professional development that matters. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  44. Little, J. W. (1993). Teachers’ professional development in a climate of educational reform. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 15(2), 129–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Loughran, J. (2010). What Expert teachers do - enhancing professional knowledge for classroom practice. Crows Nest: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  46. Mason, J. (1990). Reflections on dialogue between theory and practice, reconciled by awareness. In F. Seeger & H. Steinbring (Eds.), Proceedings of the fourth conference on the systematic cooperation between theory and practice in mathematics education: MATHEMATICS TEACHER RESEARCH 31.Google Scholar
  47. Mason, J. (1998). Enabling teachers to be real teachers: Necessary levels of awareness and structure of attention. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 1(3), 243–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Mockler, N. (2011). Beyond ‘what works’: understanding teacher identity as a practical and political tool. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and practice, 17(5), 517–528. doi: 10.1080/13540602.2011.602059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Muijs, D., & Reynolds, D. (2000). School effectiveness and teacher effectiveness in mathematics: Some preliminary findings from the evaluation of the Mathematics Enhancement Programme (Primary). School Effectiveness and School Improvement: An International Journal of Research, Policy and Practice, 11(3), 273–303.Google Scholar
  50. Mueller, A., & Skamp, K. (2003). Teacher candidates talk: Listen to the unsteady beat of learning to teach. Journal of Teacher Education, 54(5), 428–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. National Center for Educational Statistics (NCES). (2008). Revenues and expenditures for public elementary and secondary education: School Year 2005–2006 (Fiscal Year 2006). Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2008/expenditures
  52. Opfer, V. D., & Pedder, D. (2011). Conceptualizing teacher professional learning. Review of Educational Research, 81(3), 376–407. doi: 10.3102/0034654311413609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Putnam, R. T., & Borko, H. (1997). Teacher learning: Implications of new views of cognition. In International handbook of teachers and teaching (pp. 1223–1296). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  54. Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action (Vol. 5126). New York: Basic books.Google Scholar
  55. Schön, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  56. Stiggins, R. J. (1985). Improving assessment where it means the most: In the classroom. Educational Leadership, 43(2), 69–74.Google Scholar
  57. Supovitz, J. A. (2001). Translating teaching practice into improved student achievement. Yearbook-National Society for the Study of Education, 2, 81–98.Google Scholar
  58. Thompson, C. L., & Zeuli, J. S. (1999). The frame and the tapestry: Standards-based reform and professional development. In L. Darling-Hammond & G. Sykes (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 341–375). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  59. Ward, B. A., & Tikinoff, W. J. (1976). An Interactive model of research and development in teaching, report 76–1. San Francisco: Far West Laboratory for Educational Research and Development.Google Scholar
  60. Wenglinsky, H. (2000). How teaching matters: bringing the classroom back into discussions of teacher quality. Princeton: Policy Information Center, Educational Testing Service.Google Scholar
  61. Wilson, S. M., & Berne, J. (1999). Teacher Learning and the aquisition of professional knowledge: An examination of research on contemporary professional development. Review of Research in Education, 24, 173–209.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kathleen Smith
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of EducationMonash UniversityMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations