Skip to main content

Idea Inspire 3.0—A Tool for Analogical Design

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Research into Design for Communities, Volume 2 (ICoRD 2017)

Part of the book series: Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies ((SIST,volume 66))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

There is a continuous demand for novel and innovative products in the market. In order to develop novel ideas, natural systems are considered to be superior source of inspiration. In order to assist designers in ideation, an analogical design tool called Idea Inspire 3.0 is developed; it is a revised version of Idea-Inspire developed in 2005. The latest version is web-based, and supports retrieval, visualizationand addition of systems. It uses a novel, dynamic representation with amulti-system, multi-instance SAPPhIRE model as basis, and a multi-modal explanation for enhanced understanding that shouldlead to better ideation. In this paper, these latest features of Idea-Inspire along with their potential benefits are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Srinivasan, V., Chakrabarti, A.: An empirical evaluation of novelty-SAPPhIRE relationship. In: ASME 2009 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, IDETC/CIE (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bhatta, S., Goel, A., Prabhakar, S.: Innovation in analogical design: a model-based approach. In: Artificial Intelligence in Design’94, pp. 57–74 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kieras, D.E.: Should be taught: choosing instructional content for complex engineered systems. Intell. Tutoring Syst. Lessons Learn, p. 85 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Linsey, J., Wood, K., Markman, A.: Modality and representation in analogy. Artif. Intell. Eng. Des. Anal. Manuf. 22(2), 85–100 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kennedy, W.J., Rocha, G.F.: Hook design for a hook and loop fastener. Google Patents (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hargroves, K., Smith, M.: Innovation inspired by nature: biomimicry. Ecos 2006(129), 27–29 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Vakili, V., Shu, L.H.: Towards biomimetic concept generation. In: Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference, Vol. 4, pp. 327–335 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Paturi, F.R.: Zeugen der Vorzeit (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Galbraith, D.: Understanding Biology. J. Wiley & Sons, Canada (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Benyus, J.M.: Biomimicry. William Morrow, New York (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bond, G., Richman, R., McNaughton, W.: Mimicry of natural material designs and processes. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 4(3), 334–345 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bonabeau, E., Dorigo, M., Theraulaz, G.: Swarm Intelligence: From Natural to Artificial Systems. Oxford University Press (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Anderson, L.W., Krathwohl, D.R., Bloom, B.S.: A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Allyn & Bacon (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Benson, P.J.: Problems in picturing text: a study of visua/verbal problem solving. Tech. Commun. Q. 6(2), 141–160 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Pimmler, T.U., Eppinger, S.D., et al.: Integration analysis of product decompositions (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bobrow, J.: Representation and Understanding: Studies in Cognitive Science. Elsevier (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sarkar, P., Chakrabarti, A.: The effect of representation of triggers on design outcomes. AI EDAM 22(2), 101 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kletke, M.G., Mackay, J.M., Barr, S.H., Jones, B.: Creativity in the organization: the role of individual creative problem solving and computer support. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 55(3), 217–237 (2001)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Goel, A.K., Vattam, S., Wiltgen, B., Helms, M.: Cognitive, collaborative, conceptual and creative—four characteristics of the next generation of knowledge-based CAD systems: a study in biologically inspired design. Comput. Aided Des. 44(10), 879–900 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Altshuller, G., Shulyak, L., Rodman, S.: The Innovation Algorithm: TRIZ, Systematic Innovation and Technical Creativity. Technical Innovation Center, Inc. (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Domb, E., Miller, J., MacGran, E., et al.: The 39 features of Altshuller’s contradiction matrix. TRIZ J. 11, 10–12 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Vincent, J.F., Bogatyreva, O.A., Bogatyrev, N.R., Bowyer, A., Pahl, A.-K.: Biomimetics: its practice and theory. J. R. Soc. Interface 3(9), 471–482 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Vincent, J.F., Bogatyreva, O., Pahl, A.-K., Bogatyrev, N., Bowyer, A.: Putting biology into TRIZ: a database of biological effects. Creat. Innov. Manag. 14(1), 66–72 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Verhaegen, P.-A., Peeters, J., Vandevenne, D., Dewulf, S., Duflou, J.R.: Effectiveness of the PAnDA ideation tool. Procedia Eng. 9, 63–67 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Chakrabarti, A., Sarkar, P., Leelavathamma, B., Nataraju, B.: A functional representation for aiding biomimetic and artificial inspiration of new ideas. AIE EDAM 19(2), 113–132 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Qian, L., Gero, J.S.: Function–behavior–structure paths and their role in analogy-based design. AI EDAM 10(4), 289–313 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Goel, A.K., Rugaber, S., Vattam, S.: Structure, behavior, and function of complex systems: the structure, behavior, and function modeling language. Artif. Intell. Eng. Des. Anal. Manuf. 23(1), 23–35 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Abramsky, S.: Domain theory in logical form. Ann. Pure Appl. Log. 51(1), 1–77 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Hubka, V., Eder, W.E.: Theory of Technical Systems: A Total Concept Theory for Engineering Design. Springer Science & Business Media (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Jouault, F., Bézivin, J.: KM3: a DSL for metamodel specification. In: Formal Methods for Open Object-Based Distributed Systems. Springer, pp. 171–185 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Nature, A., Schwan, B.: BioInspired! BioInspired! (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Deldin, J.-M., Schuknecht, M.: The AskNature database: enabling solutions in biomimetic design. In: Biologically Inspired Design. Springer, London, pp. 17–27 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Vattam, S.S., Helms, M.E., Goel, A.K.: A content account of creative analogies in biologically inspired design. AI EDAM 24(4), 467–481 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Baldussu, A., Cascini, G., Rosa, F., Rovida, E., et al.: Causal models for bio-inspired design: a comparison. In: DS 70: Proceedings of DESIGN 2012, the 12th International Design Conference, Dubrovnik, Croatia (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Ranjan, B., Srinivasan, V., Chakrabarti, A.: System-environment view in designing. In: CIRP Design 2012. Springer, Berlin, pp. 59–70 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Stone, R.B., Wood, K.L.: Development of a functional basis for design. J. Mech. Des. 122(4), 359–370 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Eppinger, S.D., Ulrich, K.T.: Product design and development. Prod. Des. Dev (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Chakrabarti, A., Bligh, T.P.: An approach to functional synthesis of mechanical design concepts: theory, applications, and emerging research issues. Artif. Intell. Eng. Des. Anal. Manuf. 10(4), 313–331 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Brown, D.C., Chandrasekaran, B.: An Approach to Expert Systems for Mechanical Design. DTIC Document (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Miller, G.A.: WordNet: a lexical database for English. Commun. ACM 38(11), 39–41 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amaresh Chakrabarti .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Chakrabarti, A., Siddharth, L., Dinakar, M., Panda, M., Palegar, N., Keshwani, S. (2017). Idea Inspire 3.0—A Tool for Analogical Design. In: Chakrabarti, A., Chakrabarti, D. (eds) Research into Design for Communities, Volume 2. ICoRD 2017. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol 66. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3521-0_41

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3521-0_41

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-3520-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-3521-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics