Skip to main content

Disassembly for Redesign

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Research into Design for Communities, Volume 2 (ICoRD 2017)

Part of the book series: Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies ((SIST,volume 66))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The paper proposes to change the way to improve a product by switching the DfD approach (Design for Disassembly) into DfR (Disassembly for Redesign). The concept is to disassemble a product by keeping the just necessary parts that achieve the basic service, the product being still in operation. The disassembly procedure (tasks, tools, duration, resulting parts, …) is recorded in order to express how much frugal the product is. The frugality index measures the difference between the product before and after the disassembly procedure, it consequently expresses the energy to spend to innovate in a more responsible way. The methodology is supported by an example on an EEE product. A discussion is finally engaged to present the limits and the perspectives of the approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Kuo, T.-C., Huang, S.H., Zhang, H.-C.: Design for manufacture and design for ‘X’: concepts, applications, and perspectives. J. Comput. Ind. Eng. 41, 241–260 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lehto, J., Harkonen, J., Haapasalo, H., Belt, P., Mottonen, M., Kuja, P.: Benefits of DfX in requirements engineering. J. Technol. Investment 2, 23–27 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ilgin, M.A., Gupta, S.M.: Environmentally conscious manufacturing and product recovery (ECMPRO): a review of the state of the art. J. Environ. Manage. 91, 563–591 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Mital, A., Desai, A., Subramanian, A., Mital, A.: Designing for assembly and disassembly. In: Product Development, 2nd edn., pp. 159–202. Elsevier, Aamsterdam (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Rios, F.C., Chong, W.K., Grau, D.: Design for disassembly and destruction—challenges and opportunities. Procedia Eng. 118, 1296–1304 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sabaghi, M., Mascle, C., Baptiste, P.: Evaluation of products at design phase for an efficient disassembly at end-of-life. J. Clean. Prod. 116, 177–186 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gries, B., Blessing, L.: Towards a disassembly process oriented design of sustainable products. In: 14th International Conference on Engineering Design (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kljajin, M., Opalic, M.: Product disassembly sequences approach in the early stage of product design. In: 8th International Design Conference (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Iacob, R., Poposecu, D., Mitrouchev, P.: Assembly/disassembly analysis and modeling techniques: a review. J. Eng. 11, 653–664 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Soh, S.L., Ong, S.K., Nee, A.Y.C.: Application of design for disassembly from remanufacturing perspective. In: 12th Global Conference on Sustainable Manufacturing, pp. 577–582 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bhatti, Y., Khilji, S.E., Basu, R.: Globalization, change and learning in South Asia. In: Chandos Asian Studies Series, pp. 123–145. Woodhead Publishing Limited, Cambridge (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rosca, E., Arnold, M., Bendul, J.C.: Business models for sustainable innovation—an empirical analysis of frugal products and services. J. Cleaner Prod. (2016) (in press, available online)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rao, B.C.: How disruptive is frugal ? J. Technol. Soc. 35(1), 65–73 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Jeandin, T., Mascle, C.: A new model to select fasteners in design for disassembly. In: 13th Global Conference on Sustainable Manufacturing, pp. 425–430 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Eriksen, K.A.: New demands on design for disassembly to improve recycling of electrical and electronical products. In: 7th NordDesign Conference (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bovea, M.D., Pérez-Belis, V., Ibáñez-Forés, V., Quemades-Beltrán, P.: Disassembly properties and material characterisation of household small waste electric and electronic equipment. J. Waste Manag. (2016) (in Press, Available online)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Zuidwijk, R., Krikke, H.: Strategic response to EEE returns: product eco-design or new recovery processes? Eur. J. Oper. Res. 191(3), 1206–1222 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Serge Rohmer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Rohmer, S., Rodriguez, P. (2017). Disassembly for Redesign. In: Chakrabarti, A., Chakrabarti, D. (eds) Research into Design for Communities, Volume 2. ICoRD 2017. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol 66. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3521-0_33

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3521-0_33

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-3520-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-3521-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics