Skip to main content

Assessment of GRIHA and LEED on the Parameters of Sustainable Design and Development of Buildings

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Research into Design for Communities, Volume 2 (ICoRD 2017)

Part of the book series: Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies ((SIST,volume 66))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

To practice design for sustainability in the domain of Building Design, Construction and Usage, we require Sustainability Assessment (SA) Methods, Tools and Techniques; which suggest pre-design as well as post completion checks to assess impact in terms of material and energy consumption, environment, society and economics. GRIHA and LEED are the leading SA methods currently in use in India. Since they originate from different countries with different contexts, level of technology and type of usage, they possess some degree of distinction over the other. A need was felt to gather these methods and discuss so that clarity can be drawn upon the scope defined by them to address sustainability. The objective of this paper is to analysis the chosen SA methods and evaluate their scope in terms of sustainability using the three pillars of sustainable development: Social, Economic, Environmental. A literature review based evaluation of methods was conducted. From the analysis, it is evident that both the tools are targeting towards Sustainable Buildings but the criteria list of GRIHA still lay more emphasis on the Environmental and Economic pillar and less on the Social pillar. LEED has good emphasis across all the three pillars. The paper ends with suggestions on a list of social, cultural and socio-economic criteria which can be added to GRIHA for further strengthening it on the Social pillar.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427-Development and International Co-operation: Environment. http://www.un-documents.net/wced-ocf.htm. Accessed: 21 Apr 2015

  2. Chwieduk, D.: Towards sustainable-energy buildings. Appl. Energy 76(1–3), 211–217 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ching, Francis D.K.: Building Construction Illustrated, 5th edn. Wiley, Hoboken, New Jersey (2014)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Berardi, U.: Stakeholders’ influence on the adoption of energy-saving technologies in Italian homes. Energy Policy 60, 520–530 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Martens, P.: Sustainability: science or fiction? Sustain: Sci. Pract. Policy 2(1):36–41 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Reed, B.: Shifting from ‘sustainability’ to regeneration. Build. Res. Inf. 35(6), 674–680 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. http://www.teriin.org/. Accessed on 05 Sept 2015

  8. Zenko, Z., Rosi, B., Mulej, M., Mlakar, T., Mulej, N.: Mulej’s Dialectical Systems Theory—A Proven Next Step After Bertalanffy’s General Systems Theory (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Edum-Fotwe, F.T., Price, A.D.F.: A social ontology for appraising sustainability of construction projects and developments. Int. J. Project Manage. 27(4), 313–322 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bozicnik, S., Mulej, M.: From devision to integration of natural and social sciences by “the universal dialectical systems theory”. Cybern. Syst. 40(4), 337–362 (2009)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Alwaer, H., Clements-Croome, D.J.: Key performance indicators (KPIs) and priority setting in using the multi-attribute approach for assessing sustainable intelligent buildings. Build. Environ. 45(4), 799–807 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shiva Ji .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ji, S., Banerjee, S., Punekar, R.M. (2017). Assessment of GRIHA and LEED on the Parameters of Sustainable Design and Development of Buildings. In: Chakrabarti, A., Chakrabarti, D. (eds) Research into Design for Communities, Volume 2. ICoRD 2017. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol 66. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3521-0_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3521-0_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-3520-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-3521-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics