‘Fragile Body and Failing Memory’: The Construction of Care for the Elderly by the Laws and Policies in India

  • Deblina DeyEmail author


The genesis of legal discourse around care for the elderly in India can be traced to the international gerontological discourse, which pathologizes ageing and attempts to rectify it by providing universal, technical solutions to the elderly. It completely ignores the subjective articulation of needs by elderly in different socio-cultural locations. Critically analysing relevant judgements and policies, the chapter examines how the elderly are named in policy and law, and how their needs are interpreted. The study finds that the State re-enforces the dependency of the elderly through reiterative nomenclatures, which locates empowerment not solely in terms of their rights as senior citizens, but in terms of their assumed physical fragility. Also, the legal discourse around care in India valorizes the notion of care for the elderly as a matter of the family. The study highlights that the juridical notion of care is limited to ‘maintenance’ of elderly parents, in which the right to care is limited to food, clothing, residence and medical treatment of elders by their potential heirs. Such juridical notion of care bypasses needs of the elders who are childless or are single women. Care remains a uni-directional flow of material things from a person (heir) with greater resources to the elderly who seen as incapable of doing so. Even though this is respite to many, yet juridical care does not address the symbiotic and dialogic nature of care, as is in the case of Chinese law.


Care Law Medicalization Vulnerability Needs 



I am immensely grateful to Dr. Pratiksha Baxi, my PhD advisor at Centre for Law and Governance, J.N.U., without whose inspiration and insights my analyses would have remained incomplete.


  1. Bose, A., & Shankardass, M. K. (2004). Growing old in India. Delhi: B.R.Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar
  2. Boucher, G. (2006). The politics of performativity: A critique of Judith Butler. Parrhesia, 1, 112–141.Google Scholar
  3. Brijnath, B. (2014). Unforgotten: Love and the culture of dementia care in India. New Delhi: Orient Blackswan Pvt. Ltd.Google Scholar
  4. Butler, J. (2007). Gender trouble. Great Britain: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Canguilhem, G. (1991). The normal and the pathological. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
  6. Cohen, L. (1998). No aging in India: Modernity, senility and the family. UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Donzelot, J. (1997). The policing of families. USA: John Hopkins University.Google Scholar
  8. Feinberg, J. (1971). Legal paternalism. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 1(1), 105–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Foucault, M. (2003). The birth of the clinic. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Fraser, N. (1989). Unruly practices: Power, discourse and gender in contemporary social theory. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  11. Government of India (GOI), Section 125 of Criminal Procedure Code of 1973.Google Scholar
  12. Government of India (GOI). (2007). Indira Gandhi National Old Age Pension Scheme. National Social Assistance Programme (NSAP), Implemented by Ministry of rural development.Google Scholar
  13. Government of India (GOI). (2008). Integrated programme for Older Persons (IPOP), Revised Scheme. Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment.Google Scholar
  14. Green, B. S. R. (1993). Gerontology and the construction of old age. New York: Walter de Gruyter Inc.Google Scholar
  15. Katz, S. (1996). Disciplining old age: The formation of gerontological knowledge. USA: The University Press of Virginia.Google Scholar
  16. Kleinman, A. (1988). The illness narratives: Suffering, healing and the human condition. USA: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  17. Liebig, P., & Rajan, S. I. (2005). An aging India: Perspectives, prospects and policies. Jaipur: Rawat Publications.Google Scholar
  18. National Policy on Older Persons. (1999). Ministry of social justice and empowerment. New Delhi: Govt. of India.Google Scholar
  19. National Programmes for the Health Care of the Elderly (NPHCE). (2010–11). Ministry of health and family welfare.Google Scholar
  20. National Policy for Senior Citizens. (2011). Ministry of social justice and empowerment, government of India.Google Scholar
  21. Paltasingh, T., & Tyagi, R. (2012). Social security & policy on senior citizens: evidences from Asian countries. Ageing & Society, Indian Journal of Gerontology, 22(1&2), 1–20.Google Scholar
  22. Political Declaration and Madrid International Plan of Action on Ageing 2002. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
  23. Sevenhuijsen, S. (1998). Citizenship and the ethics of care: Feminist considerations on justice, morality and politics. London and NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Soneja, S. (2011). Elder abuse in India. HelpAge Country Report for WHO.Google Scholar
  25. The Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act. (2007). Ministry of law and justice.Google Scholar
  26. Wong, E. (2013). A Chinese virtue is now the law. The New York times. Retrieved June 22, 2016.
  27. Zola, I. K. (1983). Socio-medical inquiries. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar


  1. Lotika Sarkar v. Preeti Dhoundial and Ors. (2009). MANU/DE/3216/2009.Google Scholar
  2. Anbalagan v. The Sub Divisional Executive Magistrate and Revenue Divisional Officer. (2012) W.P.No.12145 of 2012.Google Scholar
  3. Wp(C). No. 17245 Of 2012 (E) vs By Adv. Sri. Varghese P.Chacko (
  4. Geeta Devi v. Financial Commissioner & Principal Secretary to Govt. Haryana and Others. (2013) MANU/PH/0628/2013.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Jindal Global Law SchoolO.P. Jindal Global UniversitySonipatIndia
  2. 2.Centre for the Study of Law and GovernanceJawaharlal Nehru UniversityNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations