Abstract
The purpose of this chapter is twofold – first, to examine the ways in which critical incident identification and analysis can reveal more about the sophisticated complexity of teaching and, second, to provide an exemplar of reflective practice inquiry in teacher education based primarily on experience and reflection (Dewey J, How we think: a restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. Henry Regenry Co., Chicago, 1933). In this chapter we examine the influence of using critical incident identification and analysis to reflect in and on our practice as teacher educators. Critical incidents were defined as incidents in our practice as teacher educators that caused us to pause and reflect on our work and were collated during an intense period of institutional change. Using self-study methodology, we collated and analysed 32 critical incidents and identified key themes including: the tensions evident in institutional and personal expectations, contrived versus organic collaboration and valuing the teacher as a researcher. In this chapter, we highlight the way the combination of a reflective inquiry lens, a research methodology (self-study of practice) and custom-designed strategies and tools highlights the practicalities and powerful influence of reflective practice.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
denotes pseudonym.
References
Ballet, K., & Kelchtermans, G. (2007). Workload and willingness to change: Disentangling the experience of intensification. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 40(1), 47–67.
Berry, A. (2007, November). Reconceptualizing teacher educator knowledge as tensions: Exploring the tension between valuing and reconstructing experience. Studying Teacher Education: A Journal of Self-Study of Teacher Education Practices, 3(2), 117–134.
Brandenburg, R. (2008). Powerful pedagogy: Self-study of a teacher educator’s practice. Dordrecht: Springer.
Brookfield, S. (1995). Becoming a critically reflective teacher. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Butcher, J., Bezzina, M., & Moran, W. (2011). Transformational partnerships: A new agenda for higher education. Innovative Higher Education, 36, 29–40.
Coia, L., & Taylor, M. (2009). Co/autoethnography: Exploring our teaching selves collaboratively. In D. L. Tidwell, M. L. Heston, & L. M. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Research methods for the self-study of practice (pp. 3–16). Dordrecht: Springer.
Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. Chicago: Henry Regenry Co..
Finlay, L. (2008). Reflecting on reflective practice. Retrieved from http://www.open.ac.uk/opencetl/files/opencetl/file/ecms/web-content/Finlay-(2008)-Reflecting-on-reflective-practice-PBPL-paper-52.pdf
Flanagan, J. C. (1954). The critical incident technique. The Psychological Bulletin, 51(4), 327–358.
Higgins, D. (2011). Why reflect? Recognising the link between learning and reflection. Reflective Practice: International and Multidisciplinary Perspectives, 12(5), 583–584.
Kelchtermans, G. (2009). Who I am in how I teach is the message: Self-understanding, vulnerability and reflection. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 15(2), 257–272.
Kosnik, C. (2001). The effects of an inquiry-oriented teacher education program on a faculty member: Some critical incidents and my journey. Reflective Practice, 2(1), 65–80.
LaBoskey, V. K. (2004). The methodology of self-study and its theoretical underpinnings. In J. J. Loughran, M. L. Hamilton, V. K. LaBoskey, & T. Russell (Eds.), International handbook of self-study of teaching and teacher education practices (pp. 817–869). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Lasky, S. (2005). A sociocultural approach to understanding teacher identity, agency and professional vulnerability in a context of secondary school reform. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 899–916.
Loughran, J. J. (1996). Developing reflective practice: Learning about teaching and learning through modelling. London: Falmer Press.
Loughran, J. (2002). Effective reflective practice: In search of meaning in learning about teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 53(1), 33–43.
Loughran, J. J. (2006). Developing a pedagogy of teacher education: Understanding teaching and learning about teaching. Abingdon: Routledge.
Loughran, J.J. (2015). Teaching: Sophisticated business. Keynote presentation at International Study Association of Teachers and Teaching 17th biennial conference, 13–17 July 2015, University of Auckland, New Zealand.
Loughran, J. J., Hamilton, M. L., LaBoskey, V. K., & Russell, T. (Eds.). (2004). International handbook of self-study of teaching and teacher education practices. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Lyons, N., Halton, C., & Freidus, H. (2013). Reflective Inquiry as transformative self-study for professional education and learning. Studying Teacher Education: A journal of self-study of teacher education practices, 9(2), 163–174.
Martinez, K. (2008). Academic induction for teacher educators. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 36(1), 35–51.
McDonough, S. (2015). Using ethical mapping for exploring two professional dilemmas in initial teacher education. Reflective Practice: International and Multidisciplinary Perspectives, 16(1), 142–153.
McDonough, S., & Brandenburg, R. (2012). Examining assumptions about teacher educator identities by self-study of the role of mentor of pre-service teachers. Studying Teacher Education: A Journal of Self-Study of Teacher Education Practices, 8(2), 169–182.
Murray, J., & Male, T. (2005). Becoming a teacher educator: Evidence from the field. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 125–142.
Samaras, A. (2011). Self-study teacher research: Improving your practice through collaborative inquiry. Los Angeles: Sage.
Samaras, A., & Freese, A. (2006). Looking back and looking forward: An historical overview of the self-study school. In C. A. Lassonde, S. Galman, & C. Kosnik (Eds.), Self-study research methodologies for teacher educators (pp. 3–19). Rotterdam: Sense.
Schön, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
Segall, A. (2002). Disturbing practice: Reading teacher education as text. New York: Peter Lang.
Shapira-Lishchinsky, O. (2011). Teachers’ critical incidents: Ethical dilemmas in teaching practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 648–656.
Teacher Education Ministerial Advisory Group [TEMAG]. (2014). Action now: Classroom ready teachers. Australian Government. Retrieved from http://www.studentsfirst.gov.au/teacher-education-ministerial-advisory-group
Tripp, D. (2012). Critical incidents in teaching developing professional judgment. London: Routledge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Brandenburg, R., McDonough, S. (2017). Using Critical Incidents to Reflect on Teacher Educator Practice. In: Brandenburg, R., Glasswell, K., Jones, M., Ryan, J. (eds) Reflective Theory and Practice in Teacher Education. Self-Study of Teaching and Teacher Education Practices, vol 17. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3431-2_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3431-2_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-3429-9
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-3431-2
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)