Abstract
As noted by authors in previous chapters of this volume, the idea of flipping the classroom is not new. But the view that flipping the classroom just means students doing work at home that they once did in classrooms is simplistic, overlooking the imperative of new technologies and how these are revolutionising conventional teaching and learning. I have been a tertiary educator in Australia for almost a decade and began flipping my classroom two years ago to better engage pre-service teachers in learning to teach English and literacy. I first heard about a flipped classroom approach through a university-wide promotion (see Chap. 1). Subsequently, I joined my university’s flipping the classroom community of practice to: learn more about what others were doing in their different settings and contexts; share experiences; gain practical ideas; discuss challenges; explore solutions; receive support; and contribute to ongoing research. In this chapter, I examine and reflect on my experiences of learning so far. In particular, I call on key concepts including community of practice, ethics of responsibility, and habitus as well as frameworks such as gateway, cornerstone, and capstone knowledge that have informed my teaching to highlight the pedagogical implications of the approach as well as the impact on student learning and achievement.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. Washington, DC: International Society for Technology in Education.
Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice (R. Nice, Trans.). Oxford: Polity Press.
Cooney, T. J. (1985). A beginning teacher’s view of problem solving. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 16(5), 324–336.
Drinkwater, M. J., Gannaway, D., Sheppard, K., Davis, M. J., Wegener, M. J., Bowen, M. J., et al. (2014). Managing active learning processes in large first year physics classes: The advantages of an integrated approach. Teaching and Learning Inquiry: The ISSOTL Journal, 2(2), 75–90.
Grossman, P. L., & Stodolsky, S. S. (1994). Considerations of content and the circumstances of secondary school teaching. Review of Research in Education, 20, 179–221.
Joldersma, C. W. (2014). A Levinasian ethics for education’s commonplaces. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
Kalantzis, M., Cope, B., & The Learning by Design Project Group. (2005). Learning by design. Melbourne, VIC: Victorian Schools Innovation Commission.
LaVan, S. (2004). Cogenerating fluency in urban science classrooms (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Lévinas, E. (1978 [1998]). Otherwise than being or beyond essence (A. Lingis, Trans.). Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.
New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 60–92.
Scherer, P. (1997). Bookclub through a fishbowl: Extensions to early elementary classrooms. In S. I. MacMahon & T. E. Raphael (Eds.), The book club connection: Literacy learning and classroom talk. New York: Teachers College Press.
Smith, S., Brown, D., Purnell, E., & Martin, J. (2015). ‘Flipping’ the postgraduate classroom: Supporting the student experience. In P. C. Layne & P. Lake (Eds.), Global innovation of teaching and learning in higher education: Transgressing boundaries (pp. 295–315). New York, NY: Springer.
Stark, P. B., & Freishtat, R. (2014). An evaluation of course evaluations. Retrieved from: https://www.stat.berkeley.edu/~stark/Preprints/evaluations14.pdf
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Wilhelm, J. D. (Ed.). (2013). Opening to possibility: Reflectivity and reflexivity in our teaching. Voices from the Middle, 20(3), 57–59.
Willis, L.-D. (2013). Parent-teacher engagement: A coteaching and cogenerative dialoguing approach (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Willis, LD. (2017). Implications for Pedagogy: Flipping the Classroom to Engage Pre-service Teachers. In: Reidsema, C., Kavanagh, L., Hadgraft, R., Smith, N. (eds) The Flipped Classroom. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3413-8_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3413-8_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-3411-4
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-3413-8
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)