Abstract
In this chapter, a case study on the use of flipped classroom approach with a postgraduate engineering course at Griffith University in Australia is presented. The aim of this case study is to demonstrate an actual design and implementation of the flipped approach as well as to discuss various issues associated with it. The chapter firstly details the contextual background and motivation of the author for using the flipped classroom approach for this particular course. It then elaborates on the details of the design and implementation and discusses the main outcomes associated with the use of flipped approach. In particular, it provides examples of specific activities and pedagogical techniques employed during the classes. The chapter concludes with a reflection on the implementation and highlights key insights into the application of flipped classroom approach within the context of a postgraduate study. Challenges and opportunities are also discussed with the view to improve future implementations of the flipped classroom approach.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alonso, F., Lopez, G., Manrique, D., & Vines, J. (2005). An instructional model for web-based e-learning education with a blended learning process approach. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(2), 217–235.
Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2007). Teaching for quality learning at university (3rd ed.). UK: Open University Press.
Brame, C. (2013). Flipping the classroom. Vanderbilt University Center for Teaching. Retrieved Monday, April 28, 2014 from http://cft.vanderbilt.edu/guides-sub-pages/flipping-the-classroom/
Butt, A. (2014). Student views on the use of a flipped classroom approach: Evidence from Australia. Business Education & Accreditation, 6(1), 33–44.
Du, X. Y., & Kolmos, A. (2006) Process competencies in a problem and project based learning environment. Proceedings of the 34th Annual SEFI Conference on Engineering Education, Uppsala, Sweden.
Gamble, N., Patrick, C. J., Stewart, R. A., & Lemckert, C. (2008). Harmony in engineering curricula: Striking a balance between traditional, PBL and WIL approaches to learning and teaching. Proceedings of the 2008 AaeE Conference, Yeppoon.
Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(4), 212–218.
Lage, M. J., Platt, G. J., & Treglia, M. (2000). Inverting the classroom: A gateway to creating an inclusive learning environment. The Journal of Economic Education, 31(1), 30–43.
Shachar, M., & Neumann, Y. (2010). Twenty years of research on the academic performance differences between traditional and distance learning: Summative meta-analysis and trend examination. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 6(2), 318–334.
Srinivasan, M., Wilkes, M., Stevenson, F., Nguyen, T., & Slavin, S. (2007). Comparing problem-based learning with case-based learning: Effects of a major curricular shift at two institutions. Academic Medicine, 82(1), 74–82.
Summers, J. J., Waigandt, A., & Whittaker, T. A. (2005). A comparison of student achievement and satisfaction in an online versus a traditional face-to-face statistics class. Innovative Higher Education, 29(3), 233–250.
University of Queensland (2013). How to flip a classroom and land on your feet—Workbook, Brisbane.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Panuwatwanich, K. (2017). Flipping a Postgraduate Classroom: Experience from Griffith University. In: Reidsema, C., Kavanagh, L., Hadgraft, R., Smith, N. (eds) The Flipped Classroom. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3413-8_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3413-8_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-3411-4
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-3413-8
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)