Flipped Classes: Drivers for Change, Transition and Implementation

  • Yasir M. Al-AbdeliEmail author


Though not a commonplace teaching and learning model, much interest is being generated in flipped classes. The arguments given for parting ways with the traditional lecture, and moving into flipped classes, are well discussed in the literature and have been derived across a broad range of disciplines. However, transitioning both teaching staff and students into flipped learning and teaching (L&T) is an issue which has attracted less attention. Before implementing flipped classes, it is also necessary to identify the range of merits which students attach to this model as well as the challenges they associate with its implementation. These matters are the focus of two research questions addressed in the present work. After presenting an overview of the justifications used to introduce flipped L&T into an engineering thermodynamics unit, the processes used to transition students into this model and the particulars of how it was applied are presented. Feedback (qualitative) derived from a questionnaire conducted at the end of the teaching semester is also reported and used to shed light on the student perspective. The chapter adds to the evidence that changing student L&T styles needs to be addressed at the design stage if introducing flipped classes and that a transitional strategy is required to assist students in adapting to the new learning environment.


Flipped teaching Motivation Application Survey Engineering Case study Thermodynamics 



Catherine Moore (Senior Organisational Development Advisor, Centre for Learning and Development, Edith Cowan University) is gratefully acknowledged for helping my transition into flipped class teaching through providing useful insights from the literature and commentary on the questionnaires used to gauge student perceptions. Student feedback included in this study on flipped classes is covered by a university human ethics approval project: (STREAM) 11227 Flipped Models of Learning and Teaching in Thermofluids. Finally, I am thankful to students who provided feedback on the flipped class model.


  1. Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Before you flip, consider this. Phi Delta Kappan, 94, 25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bergmann, J., & Waddell, D. (2012). To flip or not to flip? Learning & Leading with Technology, 39(8), 6.Google Scholar
  3. Berrett, D. (2012). How ‘flipping’ the classroom can improve the traditional lecture. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 58(25).Google Scholar
  4. Cengel, Y. A., Cimbala, J. M., & Turner, R. H. (2012). Fundamentals of thermal-fluid sciences (4th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Companies Inc.Google Scholar
  5. Clark, I. (2012). Formative assessment: Assessment is for self-regulated learning. Educational Psychology Review, 24(2), 205–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Crews, T., & Butterfield, J. (2014). Data for flipped classroom design: Using student feedback to identify the best components from online and face-to-face classes. Higher Education Studies, 4(3), 38–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Davies, R. S., Dean, D. L., & Ball, N. (2013). Flipping the classroom and instructional technology integration in a college-level information systems spreadsheet course. Educational Technology Research and Development, 61(4), 563–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fitzpatrick, J., Cronin, K., & Byrne, E. (2011). Is attending lectures still relevant in engineering education? European Journal of Engineering Education, 36(3), 301–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Forsey, M., Low, M., & Glance, D. (2013). Flipping the sociology classroom: Towards a practice of online pedagogy. Journal of Sociology, 49(4), 471–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fulton, K. (2012). Upside down and inside out: Flip your classroom to improve student learning. Learning & Leading with Technology, 39(8), 12.Google Scholar
  11. Mason, G., Shuman, T. R., & Cook, K. E. (2013). Inverting (flipping) classrooms—Advantages and challenges. Paper presented at the 120th ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Atlanta, USA.Google Scholar
  12. Meyer, J., & Land, R. (2003). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge: Linkages to ways of thinking and practising within the disciplines enhancing teaching-learning environments. In Undergraduate Courses Project, ETL Project Reports ( Report 4 (p. 12).
  13. Ng, W. (2014). Flipping the science classroom: Exploring merits, issues and pedagogy. Teaching Science, 60(3), 16–27.Google Scholar
  14. Paris, S. G., & Paris, A. H. (2001). Classroom applications of research on self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 36(2), 89–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Reeve, J. (2006). Teachers as facilitators: What autonomy supportive teachers do and why their students benefit. The Elementary School Journal, 106(3), 225–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Smith, K. A., Sheppard, S. D., Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2005). Pedagogies of engagement: Classroom-based practices. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 87–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Wilson, S. G. (2013). The flipped class: A method to address the challenges of an undergraduate statistics course. Teaching of Psychology, 40(3), 193–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Edith Cowan UniversityPerthAustralia

Personalised recommendations