Skip to main content

Flipping on a Shoestring: A Case Study of Engineering Mechanics at the University of Technology Sydney

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Flipped Classroom

Abstract

University-wide decisions are rarely made from purely pedagogical motivations so it was that the institutional pressure to use a flipped learning environment was driven by the objective of reducing face-to-face teaching time. In response to this pressure, I started flipping part of a first year civil engineering subject in the spring semester (September, October and November) of 2013. I have subsequently flipped this subject for both semesters in 2014. Since this subject, Engineering Mechanics, traditionally has a high failure rate, I saw it as an appropriate subject to trial a new approach so that I could comment on the institutional initiative from a position informed by personal experience. A flipped learning environment also appeared to align with the collaborative learning framework developed progressively over several years by Dr. Keith Willey and myself (see Fig. 10.1), and this guided the overall subject design. This chapter is an explanation of how I use the collaborative learning framework to support a flipped learning environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Amresh, A., Carberry, A., & Femiani, J. (2013). Evaluating the effectiveness of flipped classrooms for teaching CS1. In Proceedings of 2013 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Oklahoma (pp. 733–735). October 23–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, J., & Verleger, M. (2013). The flipped classroom: A survey of the research. In Proceedings of the 120th ASEE Annual Conference, Atlanta. June 23–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackboard Learning, http://www.blackboard.com/Platforms/Learn/Overview.aspx http://www.blackboard.com/learning-management-system/blackboard-learn.aspx

  • Everett, J., Morgan, J., Mallouk, K., & Stanzione, J. (2014). A hybrid flipped first year engineering course. In Proceedings of the 6th First Year Engineering Experience Conference, College Station Texas (pp. F2C1–6). August 7–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, A., Willey, K., Vassalas, K., & Li, J. (2014). Experiences with flipped learning in subjects in consecutive stages of a civil engineering programme. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference of the Australasian Association for Engineering Education, Wellington, NZ. December 8–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Litzinger, et al. (2010). A cognitive study of problem solving in statics. Journal of Engineering Education, 99(4), 337–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lord, T. (1994). Using constructivism to enhance student learning in college biology. Journal of College Science Teaching, 23(6), 346–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marton, F., & Booth, S. A. (1997). Learning and awareness. Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazzolini, P., & Daniel, S. (2014). The use of active learning methods in introductory electronics deliver positive learning outcomes, yet some academics still resist change. In Proceedings of the 12th Asia Pacific Physics Conference, Japan (pp. 017006-1–017006-7). July 14–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rooney, D., Willey, K., Gardner, A., Boud, D., Reich, A., & Fitzgerald, T. (2014). Engineers’ professional learning: Through the lens of practice. In B. Williams, J. Figueiredo, & J. Trevelyan (Eds.), Engineering practice in a global context: Understanding the technical and the social (pp. 265–283). Leiden, The Netherlands: CRC Press/Balkema.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willey, K., & Gardner, A. (2012). Collaborative learning frameworks to promote a positive learning culture. In Proceedings of 2012 Frontiers in Education Conference, Seattle, USA. October 4–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willey, K., & Gardner, A. (2014). Impact of student’s goal orientation in a flipped learning environment. In Proceedings of the 2014 conference of the Australasian Association for Engineering Education, Wellington, NZ. December 8–10.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anne Gardner .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gardner, A. (2017). Flipping on a Shoestring: A Case Study of Engineering Mechanics at the University of Technology Sydney. In: Reidsema, C., Kavanagh, L., Hadgraft, R., Smith, N. (eds) The Flipped Classroom. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3413-8_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3413-8_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-3411-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-3413-8

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics