Advertisement

Decision Making with Hesitant Fuzzy Preference Relation

  • Huchang LiaoEmail author
  • Zeshui Xu
Chapter
  • 560 Downloads
Part of the Uncertainty and Operations Research book series (UOR)

Abstract

In the process of decision making, the decision maker may be more rational and suitable to express his/her preferences by comparing each pair of objects and constructs a preference relation.

Keywords

Preference Relation Group Decision Consistency Index Preference Information Decision Organization 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Alonso S, Herrera-Viedma E, Chiclana F, Herrera F (2009) Individual and social strategies to deal with ignorance situations in multi-person decision making. Int J Inf Technol Decis Making 8:313–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cabrerizo FJ, Alonso S, Herrera-Viedma E (2009) A consensus model for group decision making problems with unbalanced fuzzy linguistic information. Int J Inf Technol Decis Making 8:109–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chen N, Xu ZS, Xia MM (2013) Interval-valued hesitant preference relations and their applications to group decision making. Knowl-Based Syst 37:528–540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chiclana F, Herrera-Viedma E, Alonso S (2009a) A note on two methods for estimating missing pairwise preference values. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part B 39:1628–1633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chiclana F, Herrera-Viedma E, Alonso S, Herrera F (2009b) Cardinal consistency of reciprocal preference relation: a characterization of multiplicative transitivity. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 17:14–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fan ZP, Ma J, Jiang YP, Sun YH, Ma L (2006) A goal programming approach to group decision making based on multiplicative preference relations and fuzzy preference relations. Eur J Oper Res 174:311–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gong ZW, Li LS, Cao J, Zhou FX (2010) On additive consistent properties of the intuitionistic fuzzy preference relation. Int J Inf Technol Decis Making 9:1009–1025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E (2000) Choice functions and mechanisms for linguistic preference relations. Eur J Oper Res 120:144–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Herrera-Viedma E, Herrera F, Chiclana F, Luque M (2004) Some issues on consistency of fuzzy preference relations. Eur J Oper Res 154:98–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Herrera-Viedma E, Chiclana F, Herrera F, Alonso S (2007) Group decision-making model with incomplete fuzzy preference relations based on additive consistency. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part B 37:176–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Liao HC, Xu ZS (2014a) Some algorithms for group decision making with intuitionistic fuzzy preference information. Int J Uncertainty Fuzziness Knowl-Based Syst 22(4):505–529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Liao HC, Xu ZS (2014b) Intuitionistic fuzzy hybrid weighted aggregation operators. Int J Intell Syst 29(11):971–993CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Liao HC, Xu ZS (2015) Consistency of the fused intuitionistic fuzzy preference relation in group intuitionistic fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. Appl Soft Comput 35:812–826CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Liao HC, Xu ZS, Xia MM (2014a) Multiplicative consistency of hesitant fuzzy preference relation and its application in group decision making. Int J Inf Technol Decis Making 13(1):47–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Liao HC, Xu ZS, Xia MM (2014b) Multiplicative consistency of interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 27(6):2969–2985Google Scholar
  16. Liao HC, Xu ZS, Zeng XJ, Merigó JM (2015) Framework of group decision making with intuitionistic fuzzy preference information. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 23(4):1211–1227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Liu HF, Xu ZS, Liao HC (2016) The multiplicative consistency index of hesitant fuzzy preference relation. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 24(1):82–93Google Scholar
  18. Ma J, Fan ZP, Jiang YP, Mao JY, Ma L (2006) A method for repairing the inconsistency of fuzzy preference relations. Fuzzy Sets Syst 157:20–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mata F, Martínez L, Herrera-Viedma E (2009) An adaptive consensus support model for group decision making problems in a multi-granular fuzzy linguistic context. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 17:279–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ngwenyama O, Bryson N (1999) Eliciting and mapping qualitative preferences to numeric rankings in group decision-making. Eur J Oper Res 116:487–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Saaty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  22. Tanino T (1984) Fuzzy preference orderings in group decision making. Fuzzy Sets Syst 12:117–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Tapia García JM, del Moral MJ, Martinez MA, Herrera-Viedma E (2012) A consensus model for group decision making problems with interval fuzzy preference relations. Int J Inf Technol Decis Making 11(4):709–725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Tzeng GH, Chiang CH, Li CW (2007) Evaluating intertwined effects in e-learning program: A novel hybrid MCDM model based on factor analysis and DEMATEL. Expert Syst Appl 32:1028–1044CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Xia MM, Xu ZS (2011a) Methods for fuzzy complementary preference relations based on multiplicative consistency. Comput Ind Eng 61(4):930–935CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Xia MM, Xu ZS (2011b) Some issues on multiplicative consistency of interval reciprocal relations. Int J Inf Technol Decis Making 10:1043–1065CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Xia MM, Xu ZS, Liao HC (2013) Preference relations based on intuitionistic multiplicative information. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 21:113–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Xu ZS (2004) On compatibility of interval fuzzy preference matrices. Fuzzy Optim Decis Making 3:217–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Xu ZS (2005) An approach to group decision making based on incomplete linguistic preference relations. Int J Inf Technol Decis Making 4:153–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Xu ZS (2006) Incomplete linguistic preference relations and their fusion. Inf Fusion 7:331–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Xu ZS (2007) Intuitionistic preference relations and their application in group decision making. Inf Sci 177:2363–2379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Xu ZS, Cai XQ (2011) Group consensus algorithms based on preference relations. Inf Sci 181:150–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Xu ZS, Liao HC (2014) Intuitionistic fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 22(4):749–761CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Xu ZS, Liao HC (2015) A survey of approaches to decision making with intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations. Knowl-Based Syst 80:131–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Xu ZS, Yager RR (2009) Intuitionistic and interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations and their measures of similarity for the evaluation of agreement within a group. Fuzzy Optim Decis Making 8:123–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Yager RR (1988) On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multi-criteria decision making. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 18(1):183–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Business SchoolSichuan UniversityChengduChina

Personalised recommendations