Hesitant Fuzzy Multiple Criteria Decision Making Methods with Complete Weight Information

  • Huchang LiaoEmail author
  • Zeshui Xu
Part of the Uncertainty and Operations Research book series (UOR)


Multiple criteria decision making takes place in many areas of operations research and management sciences. Generally, a multiple criteria decision making problem involves several alternatives, criteria and the ratings of these alternatives with respect to different criteria. Sometimes the weights of criteria are completely given while sometime are not. Different methods have been proposed regarding to different scenarios to obtain the final optimal solutions for the multiple criteria decision making problems.


  1. Buchanan J, Vanderpooten D (2007) Ranking projects for an electricity utility using ELECTRE III. Int Trans Oper Res 14:309–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chen N, Xu ZS (2015) Hesitant fuzzy ELECTRE II approach: A new way to handle multi-criteria decision making problems. Inf Sci 292:175–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chen N, Xu ZS, Xia MM (2015) The ELECTRE I multi-criteria decision making method based on hesitant fuzzy sets. Int J Inf Technol Decis Making 14(3):621–657CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dias LC, Clímaco JN (2005) Dealing with imprecise information in group multicriteria decisions: a methodology and a GDSS architecture. Eur J Oper Res 160:291–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Du Y, Liu P (2011) Extended fuzzy VIKOR method with intuitionistic trapezoidal fuzzy numbers. Inf Int Interdisc J 14:2575–2583Google Scholar
  6. Duckstein L, Gershon M (1983) Multicriterion analysis of a vegetation management problem using ELECTRE II. Appl Math Model 7:254–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Duckstein L, Opricovic S (1980) Multiobjective optimization in river basin development. Water Resour Res 16:14–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fernandez E, Olmedo R (2005) An agent model based on ideas of concordance and discordance for group ranking problems. Decis Support Syst 39:429–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Figueira JR, Mousseau V, Roy B (2005) ELECTRE methods. In: Figueira J, Greco S, Ehrgott M (eds) Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: The State of the Art Surveys. Springer Science, Business Media Inc., New York, pp 133–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Figueira JR, Greco S, Roy B, Słowiński R (2010) ELECTRE methods: Main features and recent developments. In: Zopounidis C, Pardalos PM (eds) Handbook of Multicriteria Analysis, Applied Optimization, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 51–89Google Scholar
  11. Hatami-Marbini A, Tavana M (2011) An extension of the Electre I method for group decision-making under a fuzzy environment. Omega 39:373–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hatami-Marbini A, Tavana M, Moradi M, Kangi F (2013) A fuzzy group Electre method for safety and health assessment in hazardous waste recycling facilities. Saf Sci 51:414–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hokkanen J, Salminen P, Rossi E, Ettala M (1995) The choice of a solid waste management system using the ELECTRE II decision-aid method. Waste Manage Res 13:175–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hwang CL, Yoon K (1981) Multiple attribute decision making. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kaplan RS, Norton D (1996) The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action. Harvard Business School Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
  16. Kaya T, Kahraman C (2011) Fuzzy multiple criteria forestry decision making based on an integrated VIKOR and AHP approach. Expert Syst Appl 38:7326–7333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Leyva JC, Fernandez E (2003) A new method for group decision support based on ELECTRE III methodology. Eur J Oper Res 148:14–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Liao HC, Xu ZS (2013) A VIKOR-based method for hesitant fuzzy multi-criteria decision making. Fuzzy Optim Decis Making 12(4):373–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Liao HC, Xu ZS (2014a) Multi-criteria decision making with intuitionistic fuzzy PROMETHEE. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 27(4):1703–1717Google Scholar
  20. Liao HC, Xu ZS (2014b) Intuitionistic fuzzy hybrid weighted aggregation operators. Int J Intell Syst 29(11):971–993CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Liao HC, Xu ZS (2015) Extended hesitant fuzzy hybrid weighted aggregation operators and their application in decision making. Soft Comput 19(9):2551–2564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Liou J, Tsai CY, Lin RH, Tzeng GH (2011) A modified VIKOR multiple-criteria decision method for improving domestic airlines service quality. J Air Transp Manage 17:57–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mousseau V, Dias LC (2004) Valued outranking relations in ELECTRE providing manageable disaggregation procedures. Eur J Oper Res 156:467–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Opricovic S (1998) Multicriteria optimization of civil engineering systems. Fac Civil Eng, BelgradeGoogle Scholar
  25. Opricovic S (2002) Multicriteria planning of post-earthquake sustainable reconstruction. Comput. Aided Civil Infrastruct Eng 17:211–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Opricovic S, Tzeng GH (2004) Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. Eur J Oper Res 156:445–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Opricovic S, Tzeng GH (2007) Extended VIKOR method in comparison with outranking methods. Eur J Oper Res 178:514–529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pareto V (1986) Cours d’economie politique. Droz, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  29. Park JH, Cho HJ, Kwun YC (2011) Extension of VIKOR method for group decision making with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy information. Fuzzy Optim Decis Making 10:233–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ribeiro RA (1996) Fuzzy multiple attribute decision making: a review and new preference elicitation techniques. Fuzzy Sets Syst 78:155–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Roy B (1968) Classement et choix en présence de points de vue multiples (la méthode ELECTRE), RIRO, 857–875Google Scholar
  32. Roy B, Hugonnard JC (1982) Ranking of Suburban line extension projects on the Paris metro system by a multicriteria method. Transp Res 16:301–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Roy B, Présent M, Silhol D (1986) A programming method for determining which Paris metro stations should be renovated. Eur J Oper Res 24:318–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Saaty TL (1980) The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  35. Salminen P, Hokkanen J, Lahdelma R (1998) Comparing multicriteria methods in the context of environmental problems. Eur J Oper Res 104:485–496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Vahdani B, Jabbari AHK, Roshanaei V, Zandieh M (2010) Extension of the ELECTRE method for decision-making problems with interval weights and data. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 50:793–800CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Vahdani B, Mousavi SM, Moghaddama RT, Hashemi H (2013) A new design of the elimination and choice translating reality method for multi-criteria group decision-making in an intuitionistic fuzzy environment. Appl Math Model 37:1781–1799CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wang XT, Triantaphyllou E (2008) Ranking irregularities when evaluating alternatives by using some ELECTRE methods. Omega 36:45–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wu MC, Chen TY (2011) The ELECTRE multicriteria analysis approach based on Atanassov’s intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Expert Syst Appl 38:12318–12327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Xu ZS, Xia MM (2011) Distance and similarity measures for hesitant fuzzy sets. Inf Sci 181:2128–2138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Xu ZS, Yager RR (2009) Intuitionistic and interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations and their measures of similarity for the evaluation of agreement within a group. Fuzzy Optim Decis Making 8:123–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Yu PL (1973) A class of solutions for group decision problems. Manage Sci 19:936–946CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Business SchoolSichuan UniversityChengduChina

Personalised recommendations