Skip to main content

Pricing of Pharmaceuticals: Current Trends and Outlook and the Role of Comparative Effectiveness Research

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Decision Making in a World of Comparative Effectiveness Research

Abstract

The pricing of biopharmaceuticals has recently received increasing attention, with many calling into question the current model, particularly following the fiscal crunch that occurred in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis. In this article, we review the key elements of a global biopharmaceutical pricing approach – including its specificities compared to other product pricing, the approaches currently used to price biopharmaceuticals around the world, and the role of comparative effectiveness research (CER) – and discuss key trends and the potential future outlook for the pricing of pharmaceuticals. We argue that – despite significant payer pushback, negative press, and other challenges – the current pharmaceutical pricing model has been extremely successful in delivering transformative new medicines and there does not appear to be a credible alternative model. This is no small feat given the considerable uncertainty and complexity involved in biopharmaceutical decision-making for both payers and manufacturers. At the same time, some adjustments to the current pricing model and CER are identified as necessary to address current access hurdles and payer concerns. In particular, we discuss how the European Union payer-directed pricing model needs to evolve, and how innovators must become more adept at evaluating and communicating appropriately the value of their therapy, to ensure that patients worldwide can benefit from drug innovations without undue delay or barriers to access or reimbursement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Clinton GJ (2016) Clinton Foundation helped 9 million with lower-cost AIDS drugs. Politifact. http://www.politifact.com/global-news/statements/2016/jun/15/hillary-clinton/clinton-clinton-foundation-helped-9-million-lower-/

  2. Hollande F (2016) Towards a global agenda on health security. Lancet 387 (10034):2173–2174. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30393-2. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30393-2

  3. European Medicines Agency Can regulators influence the affordability of medicines? http://www.ema.europa.eu/ema/index.jsp?curl=pages/news_and_events/news/2016/05/news_detail_002529.jsp&mid=WC0b01ac058004d5c1. Accessed 28 Sept 2016

  4. Millman J (2014) The drug that’s forcing America’s most important – and uncomfortable – health-care debate. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2014/07/24/the-drug-thats-forcing-americas-most-important-and-uncomfortable-health-care-debate/

  5. Dennis B (2016) Rattled by drug price increases, hospitals seek ways to stay on guard. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/rattled-by-drug-price-increases-hospitals-seek-ways-to-stay-on-guard/2016/03/13/1c593dea-c8f3-11e5-88ff-e2d1b4289c2f_story.html

  6. Johnson C (2015) A defining moment in modern health care. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/a-defining-moment-in-modern-health-care/2015/09/23/d6496468-6229-11e5-b38e-06883aacba64_story.html?tid=a_inl

  7. Pearson CF (2016) Majority of drugs now subject to coinsurance in medicare part D olans. Avalere. http://avalere.com/expertise/managed-care/insights/majority-of-drugs-now-subject-to-coinsurance-in-medicare-part-d-plans

  8. U.S. Food & Drug Administration Facts about Generic Drugs. Updated June 28, 2016. http://www.fda.gov/drugs/resourcesforyou/consumers/buyingusingmedicinesafely/understandinggenericdrugs/ucm167991.htm

  9. IMS Institute (2015) The role of generic medicines in sustaining healthcare systems: a European Perspective. http://www.imshealth.com/files/web/IMSH%20Institute/Healthcare%20Briefs/IIHI_Generics_Healthcare_Brief.pdf

  10. Frois C, Mortimer R, White A (2016) The potential for litigation in new era of biosimilars. Law360. http://www.law360.com/articles/842318/the-potential-for-litigation-in-new-era-of-biosimilars

  11. IMS Health (2013) Pharmerging markets. https://www.imshealth.com/files/web/Global/Services/Services%20TL/IMS_Pharmerging_WP.pdf

  12. Modern Medicine Network (2013) U.S. spending on medicines declined in 2012, IMS reports. http://drugtopics.modernmedicine.com/drug-topics/content/tags/ims-institute-healthcare-informatics/us-spending-medicines-declined-2012-im

  13. World Health Organization (2015) WHO model list of essential medicines, 19th List. http://www.who.int/medicines/publications/essentialmedicines/EML_2015_FINAL_amended_NOV2015.pdf?ua=1

  14. European Commission (2015) Study on enhanced cross-country coordination in the area of pharmaceutical product pricing. http://ec.europa.eu/health/systems_performance_assessment/docs/pharmaproductpricing_frep_en.pdf

  15. Leopold C, Mantel-Teeuwisse AK, Vogler S, Valkova S, de Joncheere K, Leufkens HG, Wagner AK, Ross-Degnan D, Laing R (2014) Effect of the economic recession on pharmaceutical policy and medicine sales in eight European countries. Bull World Health Organ 92(9):630–640d. doi:10.2471/blt.13.129114

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Olga SC, Kaitelidou CD, Panagiota LS et al (2014) Investigating the economic impacts of new public pharmaceutical policies in greece: focusing on price reductions and cost-sharing rates. Value Health Reg Issues 4:107–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Fernando S (2013) German drug rebate future at centre of debate as industry versus payer battle intensifies. Financial Times. http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/6f533284-b100-11e2-80f9-00144feabdc0.html?ft_site=falcon&desktop=true#axzz4NLdUrqab

  18. Schnipper LE, Davidson NE, Wollins DS, Tyne C, Blayney DW, Blum D, Dicker AP, Ganz PA, Hoverman JR, Langdon R, Lyman GH, Meropol NJ, Mulvey T, Newcomer L, Peppercorn J, Polite B, Raghavan D, Rossi G, Saltz L, Schrag D, Smith TJ, Yu PP, Hudis CA, Schilsky RL, American Society of Clinical O (2015) American Society of clinical oncology statement: a conceptual framework to assess the value of cancer treatment options. J Clin Oncol 33(23):2563–2577. doi:10.1200/jco.2015.61.6706

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center DrugAbacus: Evidence Driven Drug Pricing Project. http://www.drugabacus.org/

  20. National Comprehensive Cancer Network NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) with NCCN Evidence Blocks. https://www.nccn.org/evidenceblocks/

  21. The New York Times Editorial Board(2016) Another drug pricing ripoff. The New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/25/opinion/another-drug-pricing-ripoff.html?_r=0

  22. Bach PB, Saltz LB, Wittes RE (2012) In cancer care, cost matters. The New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/15/opinion/a-hospital-says-no-to-an-11000-a-month-cancer-drug.html

  23. Howard DH, Bach PB, Berndt ER, Conti RM (2015) Pricing in the market for anticancer drugs. J Econ Perspect 29(1):139–162. doi:10.1257/jep.29.1.139 http://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/jep.29.1.139

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Joubert S (2001) Accélération de l’Accés à l’Innovation Pharmaceutique : Etat des lieux et perspectives. [Thesis] University of Angers. http://dune.univ-angers.fr/fichiers/20061382/2015PPHA5045/fichier/5045F.pdf

  25. Jaroslawski S, Toumi M (2011) Market access agreements for pharmaceuticals in Europe: diversity of approaches and underlying concepts. BMC Health Serv Res 11:259. doi:10.1186/1472-6963-11-259

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Lu CY, Lupton C, Rakowsky S, Babar ZU, Ross-Degnan D, Wagner AK (2015) Patient access schemes in Asia-pacific markets: current experience and future potential. J Pharm Policy Pract 8(1):6. doi:10.1186/s40545-014-0019-x

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Vernon JA (2002–2003) Drug research and price controls. Health & Medicine (Winter):22–25. https://object.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/serials/files/regulation/2002/12/v25n4-7.pdf

  28. Garrison LP Jr, Carlson JJ, Bajaj PS, Towse A, Neumann PJ, Sullivan SD, Westrich K, Dubois RW (2015) Private sector risk-sharing agreements in the United States: trends, barriers, and prospects. Am J Manag Care 21(9):632–640

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Carone G, Schwierz C, Xavier A (2012) Cost-containment policies in public pharmaceutical spending in the EU. European Commission. http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/publications/economic_paper/2012/pdf/ecp_461_en.pdf

  30. Goldman D, Nussbaum S, Linthicum M (2016) Rapid biomedical innovation calls for similar innovation in pricing and value measurement. Health Affairs Blog. http://healthaffairs.org/blog/2016/09/15/rapid-biomedical-innovation-calls-for-similar-innovation-in-pricing-and-value-measurement/

  31. Siddiqui M, Rajkumar SV (2012) The high cost of cancer drugs and what we can do about it. Mayo Clin Proc 87(10):935–943. doi:10.1016/j.mayocp.2012.07.007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2012.07.007

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Gilman D, Dowden N (2016) Is value-based drug pricing compatible with pharma innovation? NEJM catalyst. http://catalyst.nejm.org/is-value-based-drug-pricing-compatible-with-pharma-innovation/

  33. Jipan X, Kalipso C, Isao K, Rebecca ED, Rifaiyat M, Arjun V, Cinzia M (2017) Policy considerations: ex-U.S. payers and regulators. In: Birnbaum HG, Greenberg PE (eds) Decision making in a world of comparative effectiveness research. Springer, Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  34. Haute Autorité de Santé (2007) General method for assessing health technologies. http://www.has-sante.fr/portail/upload/docs/application/pdf/general_method_eval_techno.pdf

  35. European Commission Policy. http://ec.europa.eu/health/technology_assessment/policy/index_en.htm

  36. Inahta HTA Tools & resources. http://www.inahta.org/hta-tools-resources/

  37. Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy (2011) Comparative effectiveness re-search glossary of terms. http://www.amcp.org/CERglossaryofterms/

  38. Ali R, Hanger M, Carino T (2011) Comparative effectiveness research in the United States: a catalyst for innovation. Am Health Drug Benefits 4(2):68–72

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Haute Autorité de Santé (2009) Indirect comparisons methods and validity http://www.has-sante.fr/portail/upload/docs/application/pdf/2011-02/summary_report__indirect_comparisons_methods_and_validity_january_2011_2.pdf

  40. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2013) Guide to the methods of technology appraisal 2013. https://www.nice.org.uk/process/pmg9/resources/guide-to-the-methods-of-technology-appraisal-2013-pdf-2007975843781

  41. Signorovitch JE, Sikirica V, Erder MH, Xie J, Lu M, Hodgkins PS, Betts KA, Wu EQ (2012) Matching-adjusted indirect comparisons: a new tool for timely comparative effectiveness research. Value Health J Int Soc Pharmacoeconomics Outcomes Res 15(6):940–947. doi:10.1016/j.jval.2012.05.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Lee TT, Gluck AR, Curfman G (2016) The politics of medicare and drug-price negotiation (Updated). Health Affairs Blog. http://healthaffairs.org/blog/2016/09/19/the-politics-of-medicare-and-drug-price-negotiation/

  43. Lagrange C (2016) France's Hollande to seek regulation of medicine prices at G7, G20 summits. Reuters. http://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-france-health-who-idUKKCN0WP2JZ

  44. Nazareth T, Ko JJ, Frois C, Carpenter S, Demean S, Wu EQ, Sasane R, Navarro R (2015) Outcomes-based pricing and reimbursement arrangements for pharmaceutical products in the US and EU-5: payer and manufacturer experience and outlook. Paper presented at the ISPOR 20th Annual International Meeting, Philadelphia, PA

    Google Scholar 

  45. Bradshaw J (2016) ‘I would not want to be a cancer patient in England’ says Pfizer boss. The Telegraph. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/pharmaceuticalsandchemicals/12150564/I-would-not-want-to-be-a-cancer-patient-in-England-says-Pfizer-boss.html

  46. Institute for Clinical and Economic Review (2015) PCSK9 inhibitors for treatment of high cholesterol: effectiveness, value, and value based price benchmarks https://icer-review.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Final-Report-for-Posting-11-24-15-1.pdf

  47. IMS Health (2015) Global medicines use in 2020: outlook and implications . http://www.imshealth.com:90/en/thought-leadership/quintilesims-institute/reports/global-medicines-use-in-2020

  48. Gurnon E (2016) Where trump and clinton stand on health care and medi-care http://www.forbes.com/sites/nextavenue/2016/08/12/where-trump-and-clinton-stand-on-health-care-and-medicare/#540859451eb0

  49. Balch A (2015) The need to eliminate barriers to personalized medicine. Am J Modern Care. http://www.ajmc.com/journals/evidence-based-oncology/2015/august-2015/the-need-to-eliminate-barriers-to-personalized-medicine

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christian Frois .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Frois, C., Grueger, J. (2017). Pricing of Pharmaceuticals: Current Trends and Outlook and the Role of Comparative Effectiveness Research. In: Birnbaum, H., Greenberg, P. (eds) Decision Making in a World of Comparative Effectiveness Research. Adis, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3262-2_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3262-2_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Adis, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-3261-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-3262-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics