Advertisement

The Role of Empathy in Sustainable Development and Corporate Social Responsibility of Multinational Enterprises in China

  • Maria Lai-Ling LamEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Accounting, Finance, Sustainability, Governance & Fraud: Theory and Application book series (AFSGFTA)

Abstract

This chapter is based on my reflection from twenty years’ research work on sustainability and corporate social responsibility (CSR) of foreign multinational enterprises (MNEs) in China. I advocate that firms need to incorporate the process of the development of empathetic engagement with different stakeholders in their corporate social responsibility programs if they really need to sustain their business and the market economy system. Companies need to develop the process of empathy with principles of care and justice in their relationship development with different stakeholders. The practice of empathetic engagement with stakeholders at organizational levels also develops the capabilities for social reflection and resilience in a world of permanent white water. The process allows the companies to develop their moral progress that is grounded on our innate human capacities and moral ecology of the capitalist system. During my ten years of field work in China, I interviewed Chinese executives from multinational enterprises in many cities including Beijing (2006, 2008, 2009, 2010); Shanghai (2006, 2007,2010, 2016); Hangzhou (2007, 2010), Guangzhou (2011), Wuhan (2012, 2013), Hong Kong (2006–2016), and Chongqing (2006, 2007, 2009). It appeared that some companies which received global CSR awards still used evasive compliance mechanism and followed the isomorphic practices (CSR) in China. In my study, only two out of twenty foreign MNEs practice empathetic engagement with their Chinese workers and suppliers despite having to compete in an extremely price-competitive market. These two companies are committed to corporate social responsibility in their global supply chain management and consistently connect with their local stakeholders through extensive training and development. Corporate social responsibility practices can lead to sustainable development when there is empathetic engagement with local stakeholders. Empathy, embedded in an organization culture with care and justice, allows MNEs to be more responsive to local needs and capable of transferring learning from the local to the headquarters and other areas when they want to use corporate social responsibility initiatives to sustain the companies and the best of the capitalistic system in China.

Keywords

Empathetic engagement Stakeholders Corporate social responsibility Moral ecology Multinational enterprises in China Capitalist system 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The author thanks Dr. Martha J. B. Cook, Dr. Georgia L. Eshelman, Dr. Peter. B. Vaill, Alice Lam, and 200 interviewers in this project.

References

  1. Abdul-Gafaru A (2009) Are multinational corporations compatible with sustainable development? The experience of developing countries. In: Ivanaj, McIntyre (eds) Multinational enterprises and the challenge of sustainable development. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK, pp 50–72Google Scholar
  2. Aguilera R, Rupp D, Williams C, Ganapathi J (2007) Putting the “S” back in corporate social responsibility: a multilevel theory of social change in organizations. Acad Manag Rev 32(3):836–863CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ashkanasy NM, Hartel CEJ, Daus CS (2002) Diversity and emotion: the new frontiers in organizational behavior research. J Manag 28(3):307–338Google Scholar
  4. Auroi C (2003) Improving sustainable chain management through fair trade. Green Manage Int 43:25–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bansal P (2005) Evolving sustainably: a longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development. Strateg Manag J 26(3):197–218Google Scholar
  6. Basu K, Palazzo G (2008) Corporate social responsibility: a process model of sensemaking. Acad Manag Rev 33(1):122–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Batson CD (2011) Altruism in humans. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Beji-Becheur A, Pedregal VD, Ozcaglar-Toulouse N (2008) Fair trade—just how “fair” are the exchanges? J Macromarketing 28(1):44–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Berstein A, Greenwald C (2009) Benchmarking corporate policies on labor and human rights in global supply chains. Pensions and Capital Stewardship Project Labor and Worklife Program, Harvard Law School, Boston, MA. http://www.law.harvard.edu/programs/lwp/pensions/publications/occpapers/occasionalpapers5.pdf. Accessed 14 Apr 2013
  10. Bower JL, Leonard HB, Paine LS (2011) Capitalism at risk: rethinking the role of business. Harvard Business School Publishing, Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
  11. Boyd DE, Spekman RE, Kamauff JW, Werhane P (2007) Corporate social responsibility in global supply chains: a procedural justice perspective. Long Range Plan 40:341–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Campbell J (2007) Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Acad Manag Rev 32(3):946–996CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cook M, Lam M, Klemann A (2013) Active listening and vulnerable collaboration as foundational elements in the education for sustainability. In: Proceedings of 2013 North American management society conferenceGoogle Scholar
  14. Crul L, Zinkhan G (2008) A theory of the firm perspective on marketing and distributive justice. J Macromarketing 28(1):12–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cruz L, Boehe DM (2010) How do leading retail MNCs leverage CSR globally? Insights from Brazil. J Bus Ethics 91:243–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. DiMaggio PJ, Powell WW (1983) The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Am Sociol Rev 48:147–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Drake MJ, Schlachter JT (2007) A virtue-ethics analysis of supply chain collaboration. J Bus Ethics 82:851–864CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dutton JE (2003) Breathing life into organizational studies. J Manage Inq 12(1):5–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dutton JE, Worline MC, Frost PJ, Lilius J (2006) Explaining compassion organizing. Adm Sci Q 51(1):59–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ehrenfeld J (2008) Sustainability by design: a subversive strategy for transforming our consumer culture. Yale University Press, New Haven, CTGoogle Scholar
  21. Ellram LM, Tate WL, Billington C (2008) Offshore outsourcing of professional services: a transaction cost economics perspective. J Oper Manage 26:148–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Embassy of Sweden and CSR Asia (2015) A study on corporate social responsibility development and trends in China. http://www.swedenabroad.com/ImageVaultFiles/id_29016/cf_347/CSR-development-and-trends-in-China_WEBB.PDF. Accessed 26 July 2016
  23. Eshelman G, Lam M, Cook M (2012) Three contributing factors to effective utilization of technology in management education and practice: personhood, mindfulness, and meditation. J North Am Manag Soc 6:24–34Google Scholar
  24. Freeman R (1984) Strategic management: a stakeholder approach. Pitman Publishing Inc, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  25. Glaser BG, Strauss AL (1967) The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Aldine, Chicago, ILGoogle Scholar
  26. Goleman D, Boyatzis R, McKee A (2002) Primal leadership. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
  27. Goleman D (2006) Social intelligence: the new science of human relationships. Bantam Dell, Random House Inc, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  28. Gugler P, Shi J (2009) Corporate social responsibility for developing country multinational corporations: lost war in pertaining global competiveness? J Bus Ethics 87:3–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Harney A (2008) The China price. The Penguin Press, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  30. Hoffman ML (2000) Empathy and moral development: implications for caring and justice. Cambridge University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Huberman AM, Miles M (1984) Data management and analysis methods. In Denzin, Lincoln (eds) Handbook of qualitative research. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp 428–444Google Scholar
  32. Husted B, Allen D (2007) Strategic corporate social responsibility and value creation through large firms: lessons from the Spanish experience. Long Range Plan 40:594–610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Inkpen A, Tsang E (2005) Social capital, networks, and knowledge transfer. Acad Manag Rev 30(1):146–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jo H, Harjoto MA (2012) The cause effect of corporate governance on corporate social responsibility. J Bus Ethics 106:53–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kanter R (2009) Supercorp: how vanguard companies create innovation, profits, growth, and social good. Crown Business, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  36. Kellett JB, Humphrey RH, Sleeth RG (2006) Empathy and the emergence of task and relations leaders. Leadersh Q 17:146–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kenrick V (2011) CEOs and investors embrace sustainability. http://site.destinationgreen.com/?p=985. Accessed 14 Apr 2013
  38. Krueger D (2008) The ethics of global supply chains in China—convergence of East and West. J Bus Ethics 79:113–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Laczniak G, Murphy P (2008) Distributive justice: pressing questions, emerging directions, and the promises of Rawlsian analysis. J Macromarketing 28(1). http://epublications.marquette.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1014&context=market_fac&sei-redir=1#search=“Laczniak,+1999. Accessed 14 Apr 2013
  40. Lam M, Lam A, Lam L (2010) The importance of non-Government organizations in the corporate social movement in China. The International Journal of Humanities 7(12):101–114Google Scholar
  41. Lam MLL (2000) Working with Chinese expatriates in business negotiations: portraits, issues, and applications. Quorum Books, WestportGoogle Scholar
  42. Lam MLL (2002) Globalization and Asian Christians. In: Proceedings of the 18th annual christian business faculty association conferenceGoogle Scholar
  43. Lam MLL (2004) Reflections on integrating faith and marketing education. In: Proceedings of the 20th annual christian business faculty association conferenceGoogle Scholar
  44. Lam MLL (2005) Redemptive business education in the age of globalization. In: Proceedings of the 21st annual christian business faculty association conferenceGoogle Scholar
  45. Lam MLL (2006) A study of the transfer of corporate social responsibility from multinational Enterprises to Chinese Subsidiaries: implications for Christian business educators. In: Proceedings of the 22nd Christian business faculty association annual conference. Cedarville University, Dayton, Ohio, USAGoogle Scholar
  46. Lam MLL (2007) A study of the transfer of corporate social responsibility from well-established foreign multinational enterprises to Chinese subsidiaries. In: Hooker J, Hulpke J, Madsen P (eds) Controversies in international corporate responsibility (International Corporate Responsibility Series, vol 3. Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, pp 343–363Google Scholar
  47. Lam MLL (2008) Being innovative by doing good. In: Proceedings of academy of innovation and entrepreneurship 2008. Tsinghua University, Beijing, ChinaGoogle Scholar
  48. Lam MLL (2009a) Beyond credibility of doing business in China: strategies for improving corporate citizenship of foreign multinational enterprises in China. J Bus Ethics 87:137–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lam MLL (2009b) Sustainable development and corporate social responsibility of multinational enterprises in China. In: McIntyre JR, Ivanaj S, Ivanaj V (eds) Multinational enterprises and the challenge of sustainable development. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK, pp 230–244Google Scholar
  50. Lam MLL (2010a) Political implications of the corporate social responsibility movement in China. J Int Bus Res Pract 4:125–134Google Scholar
  51. Lam MLL (2010b) Managing corporate social responsibility as an innovation in China. In: Al-Hakim L, Chen J (eds) Innovation in business and enterprise: technologies and frameworks. IGI Global, Hershey, PA, pp 224–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Lam MLL (2010c) Beyond legal compliance: toward better corporate citizenship of foreign multinational enterprises in China. J Biblical Integr Bus 13:100–109Google Scholar
  53. Lam MLL (2010d) Sustainable development in a global market economy—a compassion-oriented approach. In: Proceedings of post-Christian business faculty association conferenceGoogle Scholar
  54. Lam MLL (2011a) Becoming corporate social responsible foreign multinational enterprises in China. J Int Bus Res Pract 5:47–61Google Scholar
  55. Lam MLL (2011b) Successful strategies for sustainability in China and the global market economy. Int J Sustain Dev 3(1):73–90Google Scholar
  56. Lam MLL (2011c) Becoming corporate social responsible foreign multinational enterprises in China. J Int Bus Res Pract 5:47–61Google Scholar
  57. Lam MLL (2011d) Challenges of sustainable environmental programs of foreign multinational enterprises in China. Manag Res Rev 34(11):1153–1168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Lam MLL (2012a) An alternative paradigm for managing sustainability in the global supply chain. Int J Soc Ecol Sustain Dev 3(4):1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Lam MLL (2012b) A best practice of corporate social responsibility: going beyond words on a page and a check. In: Jaworski J (ed) Advances in sociology research, vol 13. Nova Science, New York, pp 157–164Google Scholar
  60. Lam MLL (2012c) Corporate social responsibility movement in China: what can foreign corporations’ corporate social responsibility programs in China do to universal values? In: Wang K (ed) Dialogue among cultures: peace, justice and harmony. Foreign Language Press, Beijing, China, pp 221–234Google Scholar
  61. Lam MLL (2012d) Toward sustainability through innovation. In: Proceedings of inaugural international conference on innovation and entrepreneurship: theory and practice relevant to China, Wuhan, ChinaGoogle Scholar
  62. Lam MLL (2013a) An educator as a contemplative practitioner in business education. J High Educ Theory Pract 13(2):84–93Google Scholar
  63. Lam MLL (2013b) Being Chinese: a reflective study of foreign multinational corporations’ sustainable development and global talent programs in China. In Proceedings of the NAMS (North American Management Society) of MBAA international conference, U.S.Google Scholar
  64. Lam MLL (2013c) A case study of the challenges of sustainable business development in China. In Proceedings of the 2013 AIB-Midwest conference, U.S.Google Scholar
  65. Lam MLL (2014) Empathy as a major contributing factor to sustainability in the global supply chain. In Khosrow-Pour (ed) Inventive approaches for technology integration and information resources management. IGI Global Publications, Hershey, PA, USA, pp 53–67Google Scholar
  66. Lam MLL (2015) Moral ecology in a digitized global market economy through empathetic practice. In: Proceedings in the North American Management Society conference, Chicago, U.S.Google Scholar
  67. Laszlo C (2008) Sustainable value: how the world’s leading companies are doing well by doing good. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CAGoogle Scholar
  68. Logsdon JM, Wood DJ (2005) Global business citizenship and voluntary codes of ethical conduct. J Bus Ethics 59(1–2):55–67Google Scholar
  69. Lund-Thomsen P (2008) The global sourcing and codes of conduct debate: five myths and five recommendations. Dev Change 39(6):1005–1018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Lyon D (2004) How can you help organizations change to meet the corporate responsibility agenda? Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag 11:133–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Mckague K, Oliver C (2012) Enhanced market practices: poverty alleviation for poor producers in developing countries. Calif Manag Rev 55(1):98–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Mirvis P, Googins B (2006) Stage of corporate citizenship. Calif Manag Rev 48(2):104–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Moon J (2007) The contribution of corporate social responsibility to sustainable development. Sustain Dev 15:296–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Murdoch H, Gould D (2004) Corporate social responsibility in China: mapping the environment (a study commission by the global alliance for communities and workers). GA Publication Series, Baltimore, MDGoogle Scholar
  75. Nidumolu R, Prahalad CK, Rangaswami MR (2009) Why sustainability is now the key driver of innovation. Harv Bus Rev 87(9):56–64Google Scholar
  76. Novak M (2004) The universal hunger of liberty. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  77. Philipp B (2009) Multinationals’ sustainable supply chains and influence on suppliers inside and outside the U.S.: a comparative approach. In: McIntyre JR, Ivanaj S, Ivanaj V (eds) Multinational enterprises and the challenge of sustainable development. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK, pp 141–163Google Scholar
  78. Porter M, Kramer M (2006) Strategy & society: the link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harv Bus Rev 84(12):78–92 Google Scholar
  79. Prasad E (2015) The path to sustainable growth in China. Brookings Institution. http://www.brookings.edu/research/testimony/2015/04/22-sustainable-growth-china-prasad. Accessed 30 June 2015
  80. Pruzan P (2008) Spirituality as a firm basis for corporate social responsibility. In: Crane A, McWilliams A, Matten D, Moon J, Siegel D (eds) The Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, pp 552–559Google Scholar
  81. Rondinelli D (2006) Globalization of sustainable development? Principles and practices in transnational corporations. In: Paper presented at MESD International Research Colloquium in the Georgia Tech, Atlanta, GAGoogle Scholar
  82. Salovey P, Mayer JD (1990) Emotional intelligence. Imagination Cogn Pers 9(3):185–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Sarewitz D (2016) Presentation at the sixth ISBEE world congress in Shanghai, China on 14 July 2016Google Scholar
  84. Schepers D (2006) The impact of NGO network conflict on the corporate social responsibility strategies of multinational corporations. Bus Soc 45(3):282–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Simola SK (2007) The pragmatics of care in sustainable global enterprise. J Bus Ethics 74:131–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Stiglitz JE (2006) Making globalization work. W. W. Norton, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  87. Students & Scholars Against Corporate Misbehavior (SACOM) (2010) Dying young: suicide & China’s booming economy. http://sacom.hk/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/dying-young_sucide-chinas-booming-economy.pdf. Accessed 14 Apr 2013
  88. Sum NL, Ngai P (2005) Globalization and paradoxes of ethical transnational production: code of conduct in a Chinese workplace. Compet Change 9(2):181–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Tate WL, Ellram LM, Bals L, Hartmann E (2009) Offshore outsourcing of services: an evolutionary perspective. Int J Prod Econ 120:512–524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Vaill PB (1989) Managing as a performing art. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CAGoogle Scholar
  91. Vaill PB (1996) Learning as a way of being: strategies for survival in a world of permanent white water. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CAGoogle Scholar
  92. Vaill PB (2007) Organizational epistemology: interpersonal relations in organizations and the emergence of wisdom. In: Kessler E, Bailey J (eds) The handbook of managerial and organizational wisdom. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp 327–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Visser W (2008) Corporate social responsibility in developing countries. In: Crane A, McWilliams A, Matten D, Moon J, Siegel D (eds) The Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, pp 473–502Google Scholar
  94. Walumbwa FO, Hartnell CA, Oke A (2010) Servant leadership, procedural justice climate, service climate, employee attitudes, and organizational citizenship behavior: a cross-level investigation. J Appl Psychol 95(3):517–529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Wood CH, Kaufman A (2007) The communication of corporate social responsibility (CSR) through the supply chain: an SME perspective. In: Susman IG (ed) Small and medium-sized enterprises and the global economy. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK, pp 140–153Google Scholar
  96. Young IM (2004) Responsibility and global labor justice. J Polit Philos 12(4):365–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Zadek S (2004) The path to corporate responsibility. Harv Bus Rev 82(12):125–132Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Research DepartmentAJ-Great LimitedHong KongChina

Personalised recommendations