Advertisement

Auditor Stress: Literature Review and Classification

  • Iffet KesimliEmail author
  • Serol Karalar
  • Özgür Tasdemir
Chapter
Part of the Accounting, Finance, Sustainability, Governance & Fraud: Theory and Application book series (AFSGFTA)

Abstract

The aim of this study is to review the effects of the recent auditing quality standards on auditing companies and auditors and also review the literature about auditor stress stemming from other stress factors, which have impacts on audit quality. In the first hand, recent Turkish and American audit standards mentioning audit quality are examined. Secondly, stress factors impacting audit quality have been classified. The main source of the literature survey is Web of Science, where 98 papers published in prestigious journals had been accessed. As the second valuable source, the American Accounting Association publications are referred. An additional 20 relevant academic studies are also handled. Along with other criteria, all of these studies are classified according to their research questions and methods. Similar studies either to complete the findings or to enhance those academic researches are planned to be conducted to explore auditor stress in Turkey. The limitations of the study is the usage of above-mentioned Web sources; thus the conscience omittance of non-indexed research. In the last section, authors have recommendations for further researches on auditor stress.

Keywords

Auditor Stress Literature survey Classification Audit standards 

References

  1. Ahson U, Asokan A (2004) Dimensions of pressures faced by auditors and its impact on auditors’ independence: a comparative study of the USA and Australia. Manag Audit J 19(1):99–116 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ameer R, Isa R, Bin Abdullah A (2011) A survey on the usage of derivatives and their effect on cost of equity capital. J Deriv 19(1):56–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beehr TA, Newman JE (1978) Job stress, employee health and organizational effectiveness: a facet analysis, model and literature review. Pers Psychol 31(4):665–699CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bhattacharjee S, Moreno K, Riley T (2012) The interplay of interpersonal affect and source reliability on auditors’ inventory judgments. Contemp Acc Res 29(4):1087–1108.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.2011.01139.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bills K, Swanquist Q, Whited R (2016) Growing pains: audit quality and office growth. Contemp Acc Res 33(1):288–313.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12122 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bierstaker JL, Wright A (2001). The effects of fee pressure and partner pressure on audit planning decisions. Advances in accounting, incorporating advances in international accounting. pp 1825-1846.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0882-6110(01)18004-1, 29.02.2016
  7. Braun RL (2000) The effect of time pressure on auditor attention to qualitative aspects of misstatements indicative of potential fraudulent financial reporting. Acc Org Soc 25(3) 243–259; ISSN 0361-3682,  http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(99)00044-6.(http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0361368299000446) (April)
  8. Breger D, Edmonds M (2016). The impact of audit room noise on audit quality: a theoretical inquiry. J Theor Acc Res Spring 2016, 11(2):78–93Google Scholar
  9. Carcello J, Hermanson D, Huss H (2000) Going-concern opinions: the effects of partner compensation plans and client size. Auditing-a J Pract Theory 19(1):67–77.  https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2000.19.1.67 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Choo F (1995) Auditors’ judgment performance under stress: a test of the predicted relationship by three theoretical models. J Acc Audit Finance 10(3):611–641 (Summer)Google Scholar
  11. Clarkson P, Emby C, Watt V (2002) Debiasing the outcome effect: the role of instructions in an audit litigation setting. Auditing-a J Pract Theory 21(2):7–20.  https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2002.21.2.7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Eutsler J, Nickell E, Robb S (2016) Fraud risk awareness and the likelihood of audit enforcement action. Acc Horizons 30(3):379–392.  https://doi.org/10.2308/acch-51490 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fisher RT (2001) Role stress, the type a behavior pattern, and external auditor job satisfaction and performance. Behav Res Acc 13(p143):28pGoogle Scholar
  14. Gimbar C, Hansen B, Ozlanski M (2016) The effects of critical audit matter paragraphs and accounting standard precision on auditor liability. Acc Rev 91(6):1629–1646.  https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-51382 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gundry LC, Liyanarachchi GA (2007) Time budget pressure, auditors’ personality type, and the incidence of reduced audit quality practices. Pacific Acc Rev 19(2):125–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Haskins ME, Baglioni AJ Jr, Cooper CL (1990) An investigation of the sources, moderators, and psychological symptoms of stress among audit seniors. Contemp Acc Res. Part 1, 6(2), 361–385 (Spring)Google Scholar
  17. Kelly T, Margheim L, Pattison D (2011) Survey on the differential effects of time deadline pressure versus time budget pressure on auditor behavior. J Appl Bus Res (JABR) 15(4):117–128.  http://dx.doi.org/10.19030/jabr.v15i4.5666
  18. Kesimli I (2015) Assessment of Turkish Auditing firms from the perspective of International Quality Control Standard, Trakya University Social Graduate Schools, Unpublished PhD Thesis, EdirneGoogle Scholar
  19. Koch C, Weber M, Wüstemann J (2012) Can auditors be independent? Experimental evidence on the effects of client type. Eur Acc Rev 21(4):797–823.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2011.629416 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Larson LL (2004) Internal auditors and job stress. Manag Audit J 19(9):1119–1130. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02686900410562768
  21. Larson LL, Murff EJT (2006) An analysis of job stress outcomes among bank internal auditors. Bank Acc Finance 19(4):39–43. 5 p (Jun 2006)Google Scholar
  22. Larson LL, Meier HH, Poznanski PJ, Tipton Murff EJ (2004) Concepts and consequences of internal auditor job stress. J Acc Finance Res 12(6):35–46Google Scholar
  23. López DM, Peters GF (2012) The effect of workload compression on audit quality. Auditing 31(4):139–165.  https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-10305 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Otley DT, Pierce BJ (1996) Auditor time budget pressure: consequences and antecedents. Acc Audit Acc J 9(1):31–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pennington RR, Kelton AS, DeVries DD (2006) The effects of qualitative overload on technology acceptance. J Inf Syst 20(2):25–36, 12 p (Fall)Google Scholar
  26. Ponemon LA (1992) Auditor underreporting of time and moral reasoning: An experimental lab study. Contemp Acc Res 9(1):171–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Qureshi I, Jamil RA, Iftikhar M, Arif S, Lodhi S, Naseem I, Zaman K (2012) Job stress, workload, environment and employees turnover intention: Destiny or choice. Archives of Sciences, 65(8):230–241. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=2152930. Access 5 Jan 2017
  28. Rebele James E, Michaels Ronald E (1990) Independent auditors’ role stress: antecedent, outcome, and moderating variables. Behav Res Acc 2:p124Google Scholar
  29. Shafaghat A, Keyvanfar A, Ferwati M, Alizadeh T (2015) Enhancing staff’s satisfaction with comfort toward productivity by sustainable Open Plan Office Design. Sustain Cities Soc 19:151–164.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2015.08.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Smith S, Tayler W, Prawitt D (2016) The effect of information choice on auditors’ judgments and confidence. Acc Horizons 30(3):393–408.  https://doi.org/10.2308/acch-51493 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Stefaniak C, Houston R, Cornell R (2012) The effects of employer and client identification on internal and external auditors’ evaluations of internal control deficiencies. Auditing-a J Pract Theory 31(1):39–56.  https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-10179 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Umans T, Broberg P, Schmidt M, Nilsson S, Olsson E (2016) Feeling well by being together: study of Swedish auditors. Work-a J Prev Assess Rehabil 54(1):79–86.  https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-162270 Google Scholar
  33. Wittlin M (2016) Hindsight Evidence. Columbia Law Rev 116(5):1323–1394Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Iffet Kesimli
    • 1
    Email author
  • Serol Karalar
    • 2
  • Özgür Tasdemir
    • 2
  1. 1.Kırklareli UniversityKırklareliTurkey
  2. 2.Trakya UniversityEdirneTurkey

Personalised recommendations