Wittgenstein and Therapeutic Education

Chapter

Abstract

Wittgenstein’s method of doing philosophy with a therapeutic purpose has a direct bearing on current debates about the propriety of therapeutic education. Many detractors of therapeutic education worry that the practice contributes to a secular understanding of the self and of personal responsibility that is morally bankrupt and damaging to both individuals and society. They worry that therapeutic education teaches students to think of themselves as damaged and to think of their actions as rooted in their wounds rather than in autonomous choices. In that spirit, such critics of therapeutic education call for a return to a “traditional” academic curriculum, and to a view of individuals as morally capable and culpable. While such complaints might be valid for some particular therapeutic educational programs, Wittgenstein’s manner of examining and healing himself through the process of philosophical reflection demonstrates the soundness of therapeutic education, at least in principle. Wittgenstein’s example shows that the sort of open-ended examinations of self, morality, and one’s conception of the world associated with therapeutic education is essential to the development of moral depth and spiritual well-being rather than being antithetical to them. Critics of therapeutic education may be hostile to Wittgenstein’s example of moral and spiritual seeking because they are wedded to the ideas of moral and religious truth rooted in what Charles Taylor identifies as having evolved during the Reformation, whereas Wittgenstein’s own method is more in keeping with a progressive religious outlook that emerged in the cultural revolution of the 1960s.

Keywords

Wittgenstein Therapy Therapeutic education Religion Secularism 

References

  1. Aldenmyr, S. I. (2012). Moral aspects of therapeutic education: A case study of life competence education in Swedish education. Journal of Moral Education, 41(1), 23–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amsler, S. S. (2011). From therapeutic to political education: The centrality of affective sensibility in critical pedagogy. Critical Studies in Education, 52(1), 47–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA). (2010). The shape of the Australian Curriculum. Version 2.0. Sydney: ACARA.Google Scholar
  4. Crary, A. (2000a). Introduction. In A. Cray & R. Read (Eds.), The new Wittgenstein (pp. 1–18). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Crary, A. (2000b). Wittgenstein’s philosophy in relation to political thought. In A. Cray & R. Read (Eds.), The new Wittgenstein (pp. 118–145). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Drury, M. O. C. (1981). Conversations with Wittgenstein. In R. Rhees (Ed.), Ludwig Wittgenstein: Personal recollections (pp. 112–189). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  7. Ecclestone, K., & Hayes, D. (2009). The dangerous rise of therapeutic education. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Fischer, E. (2011). Diseases of the understanding and the need for philosophical therapy. Philosophical Investigations, 34(1), 22–54.Google Scholar
  9. Hagberg, G. (2003). On philosophy as therapy: Wittgenstein, Cavell, and autobiographical writing. Philosophy and Literature, 27(1), 196–210.Google Scholar
  10. Harré, R. (2008). Grammatical therapy and the third Wittgenstein. Metaphilosophy, 39(4–5), 484–491.Google Scholar
  11. House of Commons Education Committee. (2015). Life lessons: PSHE and SRE in schools. http://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/commons-select/education-committee/inquiries/parliament-2010/pshe-and-sre-inschools/. Accessed March 6, 2015.
  12. Hutchinson, P. (2007). What’s the point of elucidation? Metaphilosophy, 38(5), 691–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Janik, A., & Toulmin, S. (1973). Wittgenstein’s Vienna. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  14. Kant, I. (1785/1959). Foundations of the metaphysic of morals. New York: Bobbs-Merrill Company, Inc.Google Scholar
  15. Lasch, C. (1979/1991). The culture of narcissism: American life in an age of diminishing expectations. New York: W.W. Norton. Google Scholar
  16. Mintz, A. (2009). Has therapy intruded into education? Journal of Philosophy of Education, 43(4), 633–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Monk, R. (1990). Ludwig Wittgenstein: The duty of genius. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  18. Nachlass, W. (2000). Bergen electronic edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Palmer, S. (2010). Toxic childhood: How the modern world is damaging our children and what we can do about it. London: Orion.Google Scholar
  20. Rak, A. (1868). Die Convertiten seit der Reformation. Freiburg: R.M. Hoffman.Google Scholar
  21. Rieff, P. (1966/1987). The triumph of the therapeutic: Uses of faith after Freud. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  22. Schlafly, P. (2007). Child abuse in the classroom. In P. Schweizer & W. C. Hall (Eds.), Landmark speeches of the American conservative movement (pp. 94–104). College Station, TX: Texas A&M University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Seligman, M. E. P., Ernst, R. M., Gillham, J., Reivich, K., & Kinkins, M. (2009). Positive education: Positive psychology and classroom interventions. Oxford Review of Education, 35(3), 293–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Smeyers, P., Smith, R., & Standish, P. (2007/2010). The therapy of education: Philosophy, happiness, and personal growth. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  25. Taylor, C. (2007). A secular age. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University.Google Scholar
  26. Wittgenstein, L. (1957/1999). Philosophical investigations (G. E. M. Anscombe, Trans.). Oxford: Blackwell (PI).Google Scholar
  27. Wittgenstein, L. (1958/1998). The blue and the brown books. Oxford: Basil Blackwell (BB).Google Scholar
  28. Wittgenstein, L. (1969/1998). On certainty (revised 2nd ed., G. H. von Wright & H. Nyman, Eds., P. Winch, Trans., A. Pichler, Revised). Oxford: Blackwell (OC).Google Scholar
  29. Wittgenstein, L. (1977/1998). Culture and value (G. H. von Wright, Ed., P. Winch, Trans.). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press (CV).Google Scholar
  30. Wittgenstein, L. (1991/1998). Zettel (2nd ed., G. E. M. Anscombe & G. H. von Wright, Eds., G. E. M. Anscombe, Trans.). Oxford: Blackwell (Z).Google Scholar
  31. Wittgenstein, L. (2000). Wittgenstein’s Nachlass. Bergen Electronic Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press (WN).Google Scholar
  32. Wright, K. (2014). Student wellbeing and the therapeutic turn in education. Australian Educational and Developmental Psychologist, 31(2), 141–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Philosophy and ReligionWestern Carolina UniversityCullowheeUSA

Personalised recommendations