Imagining Philosophy of Religion Differently: Interdisciplinary Wittgensteinian Approaches
Despite a growing interest in philosophy of religion in secondary level education , especially in the United Kingdom, courses at undergraduate level frequently fail to build upon the preliminary understanding that students have gained. A fixation on the evaluation of religious “truth-claims” tends to detract from an appreciation of the variegated nature of religious forms of life and practice , while a limited palette of examples constrains the cross-cultural reach of the subject . After outlining weaknesses in the approach often taken to teaching philosophy of religion , this chapter considers both how increased interdisciplinary engagement can deepen and expand the cultural range of philosophy of religion and how Wittgenstein -inspired modes of investigation can facilitate such interdisciplinarity. The influence of Wittgenstein’s ideas in the study of religion outside philosophy is concisely surveyed, and examples are given from my own teaching of how to integrate Wittgensteinian and interdisciplinary dimensions into an undergraduate course.
KeywordsPhilosophy of religion Ludwig Wittgenstein Interdisciplinary approaches Cross-cultural Anthropology
An earlier version of this chapter was presented at the 50th anniversary conference of the Philosophy of Education Society of Great Britain, 29 July 2015. I am grateful to Paul Standish and Naomi Hodgson for the invitation to participate in that conference and to members of the audience for their lively questions and discussion. Special thanks go to David Cockburn and Ieuan Lloyd, both of whom engaged me in correspondence subsequent to the conference.
- BPA/SWIP UK. (2014). Good practice scheme. http://bpa.ac.uk/uploads/Good%20Practice%20Scheme/All%20GP%20docs.pdf. Accessed August 19, 2015.
- Burley, M. (2015). How to teach philosophy of religion. Teaching Philosophy, 38(4), 427–449.Google Scholar
- Diversity Reading List. (2015). http://www.diversityreadinglist.org. Accessed August 19, 2015.
- Doniger, W. (2010). The Hindus: An alternative history. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Halbfass, W. (1988). India and Europe: An essay in understanding. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
- Jackson, R. (1988). The twilight language (R. S. Bucknell & M. Stuart-Fox). Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies, 11(2), 123–130.Google Scholar
- James, W. (2003). The ceremonial animal: A new portrait of anthropology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Kemp, D. (2004). New age: A guide. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
- King’s College London. (2014–2015). 6AANB025 philosophy of religion module syllabus 2014–15. http://www.kcl.ac.uk/artshums/depts/philosophy/modules/syllabus2014-15/6AANB025-syllabus-2014-15.pdf. Accessed April 22, 2015.
- MacDonald, N. B. (2005). Language-game. In K. J. Vanhoozer (Ed.), Dictionary for theological interpretation of the Bible (pp. 435–437). Grand Rapids, MI: Baker.Google Scholar
- MAP: Minorities and Philosophy. (2015). http://www.mapforthegap.com. Accessed April 22, 2015.
- Mawson, T. J. (2005). Belief in God: An introduction to the philosophy of religion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Mayled, J., Oliphant, J., & Taylor, M. (2015). OCR philosophy of religion for AS and A2 (3rd ed.). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Needham, R. (1972). Belief, language, and experience. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Needham, R. (1975). Polythetic classification: Convergence and consequences. Man, 10(3), 349–369.Google Scholar
- OCR. (2013). AS/A level GCE religious studies specification, Version 4. http://www.ocr.org.uk/Images/81960-specification.pdf. Accessed August 19, 2015.
- Schilbrack, K. (2014). Philosophy and the study of religions: A manifesto. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Smart, N. (1959). Numen, nirvana, and the definition of religion. Church Quarterly Review, 160(2), 216–225.Google Scholar
- SWIP UK: Society for Women in Philosophy UK. (2015). http://www.swipuk.org. Accessed April 22, 2015.
- von Stietencron, H. (1997). Hinduism: On the proper use of a deceptive term. In G.-D. Sontheimer & H. Kulke (Eds.), Hinduism reconsidered (2nd ed., pp. 32–53). Delhi: Manohar.Google Scholar
- Winch, P. (1964). Understanding a primitive society. American Philosophical Quarterly, 1(4), 307–324.Google Scholar
- Wittgenstein, L. (1969). The blue and brown books (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell (BB).Google Scholar
- Wittgenstein, L. (1974). Tractatus logico-philosophicus (revised ed.). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul (TLP).Google Scholar
- Wittgenstein, L. (1979). In A. Ambrose (Ed.), Wittgenstein’s lectures: Cambridge, 1932–1935. Oxford: Blackwell (WL).Google Scholar
- Wittgenstein, L. (1993). Remarks on Frazer’s Golden Bough. In J. C. Klagge & A. Nordmann (Eds.), Philosophical occasions, 1912–1951 (pp. 115–155). Indianapolis, IN: Hackett (PO).Google Scholar
- Wittgenstein, L. (1998). Culture and value (revised ed.). Oxford: Blackwell (CV).Google Scholar