Advertisement

And if L. Wittgenstein Helped Us to Think Differently About Teacher Education?

  • Sébastien Chaliès
  • Stefano Bertone
Chapter

Abstract

This article outlines a broad research program (Lakatos 1987) in cultural anthropology that has been conducted over the past fifteen years in the field of teacher education. The core hypotheses of the program and their theoretical foundations, which are based on analytical philosophy (Wittgenstein in Philosophical investigations (PI). Blackwell, Oxford, 1968), are first reviewed: the immanence of the subject through and in the experience of language, the assumption of individuation and subsequent subjectivization, and subjectivization as the process of following rules and/or carrying out the actions governed by the rules. The theoretical advances in the study of subjectivization are then presented, along with the empirical research findings that show how the subjectivized individual in teacher education is constructed from and through learning rules. The article concludes with an explanation of why it is important to expand this research stream on subjectivization, which is defined as a process occurring in and through actions governed by rules.

Keywords

Cultural anthropology Subjectivization Rules Subject Teacher education 

References

  1. Berducci, D. (2004). Vygotsky through Wittgenstein: A new perspective on Vygotsky’s developmental continuum. Theory Psychology, 14(3), 329–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bertone, S., & Chaliès, S. (2015). Construire un programme de recherche technologique sur la formation des enseignants: choix épistémologiques et théoriques. [Constructing a technological research program on teacher education]. @ctivités, 12(2), 53–72. http://www.activites.org/v12n2/v12n2.pdf
  3. Bertone, S., Chaliès, S., & Clot, Y. (2009a). Contribution of an action theory for conceptualizing and evaluating reflexive practices in the initial training of teachers. Le Travail Humain, 72(2), 104–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bertone, S., Chaliès, S., & Flavier, E. (2009b). Co-analysis work in the triadic supervision of preservice teachers based on neo-Vygotskian activity theory: Case study from a French University Institute of Teacher Training. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 15(6), 653–667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Butler, J. (1997). The psychic life of power. Standford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Cash, M. (2009). Normativity is the mother of intention: Wittgenstein, normative practices and neurological representations. New Ideas in Psychology, 27, 133–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chaliès, S., Amathieu, J., & Bertone, S. (2013). Training teachers to improve their job satisfaction: Theoretical proposals and empirical illustrations. Le Travail Humain, 76(3), 309–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chaliès, S., Bruno, F., Méard, J., & Bertone, S. (2010). Training preservice teachers rapidly: The need to articulate the training given by university supervisors and cooperating teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(4), 764–774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chauviré, C. (2009). The immanence of the ego (L’immanence de I’égo). Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
  10. Chaliès, S., Cartaud, S., Escalié, G., & Durand, M. (2009). Literature review—The utility of the mentoring for preservice teachers: The proof by 20 years of experiment. Recherche et Formation, 61, 85–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chaliès, S., Escalié, G., Bertone, S., & Clarke, A. (2012). Learning ‘rules’ of practice within the context of the practicum triad: A case study of learning to teach. Canadian Journal of Education, 35(2), 3–23.Google Scholar
  12. Clot, Y. (2008). Travail et pouvoir d’agir [Work and the power to act]. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
  13. Davis, A. (2009). Examples as method? My attempts to understand assessment and fairness in the spirit of the later Wittgenstein. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 43(3), 371–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Descombes, V. (2004). Le complément de sujet. Enquête sur le fait d’agir soi-même [Complement to the subject. Inquiry into acting oneself]. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  15. Feiman-Nemser, S. (2001). Helping novices learn to teach. Lessons from an exemplary support teacher. Journal of Teacher Education, 52(1), 17–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lähteenmäki, M. (2003). On rules and rule following: Obeying rules blindly. Language & Communication, 23(1), 45–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lakatos, I. (1994). Histoire et méthodologie des sciences [History and methodology in the sciences]. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
  18. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Laugier, S. (2010). Wittgenstein: Ie mythe de i’inexpressivité [Wittgenstein: The myth of inexpressiveness]. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
  20. Le Du, M. (2004). La nature sociale de l’esprit [The social nature of the mind]. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
  21. Legrand, D. (2005). Pre-reflective self-as-subject from experiential and empirical perspectives. Consciousness and Cognition, 16, 583–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Livet, P. (1993). Théorie de l’action et conventions [Theory of action and conventions]. In P. Ladrière, P. Pharo, & L. Quéré (Eds.), La théorie de l’action. Le sujet pratique en débat [The theory of action. The practical subject under debate] (pp. 291–319). Paris: CNRS Éditions.Google Scholar
  23. Macherey, P. (2009). De Canguilhem à Foucault: la force des normes [From Canguilhem to Foucault: The power of norms]. Paris: La Fabrique.Google Scholar
  24. Miller-Rigelman, N., & Ruben, B. (2012). Creating foundations for collaboration in schools: Utilizing professional learning communities to support teacher candidate learning and visions of teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(7), 979–989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Nelson, K. (2008). Wittgenstein and contemporary theories of word learning. New Ideas in Psychology, 4(3), 1–13.Google Scholar
  26. Ogien, A. (2007). Les formes sociales de la pensée. La sociologie après Wittgenstein [The social forms of thought. Sociology after Wittgenstein]. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar
  27. Proudfoot, D. (2009). Meaning and mind: Wittgenstein’s relevance for the “Does language shape thought?” Debate. New Ideas in Psychology, 27(2), 163–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Roehrig, A., Bohn, C., Turner, J., & Pressley, M. (2008). Mentoring beginning primary teachers for exemplary teaching practices. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(3), 684–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rogoff, B., Matusov, E., & White, C. (1996). Models of teaching and learning: Participation in a community of learners. In D. R. Olson & N. Torrance (Eds.), The handbook of education and human development: New models of learning, teaching and schooling (pp. 388–414). Oxford: Basil Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
  30. Rozelle, J. J., & Wilson, S. M. (2012). Opening the black box of field experiences: How cooperating teachers’ beliefs and practices shape student teachers’ beliefs and practices. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(8), 1196–1205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Searle, J. R. (1998). Construction of social reality. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  32. Taylor, C. (1997). La liberté des modernes [The freedom of the moderns]. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
  33. Vygotski, L.S. (2003). Conscience, inconscient, émotions [Consciousness, the unconscious, emotions]. Paris: La Dispute.Google Scholar
  34. Williams, M. (2002). Is everything interpretation? In C. Chauviré & A. Ogien (Eds.), Regularity (pp. 207–233). Paris: EHESS.Google Scholar
  35. Winch, P. (2009). L’idée d’une science sociale et sa relation à la philosophie [The idea of a social science and its relation to philosophy]. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  36. Wittgenstein, L. (1968). Philosophical investigations (3rd ed., G. E. M. Anscombe, Trans.). Oxford: Basil Blackwell (PI§, or PI, pg.).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University Institute of Teacher Training of ToulouseToulouseFrance
  2. 2.University Institute of Teacher Training of the ReunionLA ReunionFrance

Personalised recommendations