Professional Learning and Wittgenstein: A Learning Paradox Emerges

Chapter

Abstract

On the basis of a survey of the classical learning paradox (as first described by Plato and given its modern formulation by Fodor ), I argue that a kind of professional learning paradox holds, in particular for professionals and professional peer groups attempting to learn new content. Given Wittgenstein’s notions of training and “logical grammar” (following Shanker (1986) in this latter formulation) and the situation of professionals who are essentially on their own in learning new things, it is difficult to see how professionals could bootstrap their own understanding. I suggest that the set of practices or language games constitutive of inquiry may serve to help to some degree in this matter. However, this is not a (dis)solution to the learning paradox—especially given that the professional learning paradox is not a philosophical problem. Finally I point out that this proposal connects to political issues concerning the relationship between institutions and professionals, with regard to the kind of environment entailed by the needs of professional learning .

Keywords

Professional learning Wittgenstein Schön Inquiry 

References

  1. Armitage, D., Marschke, M., & Plummer, R. (2008). Adaptive co-management and the paradox of learning. Global Environmental Change, 18, 86–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Argyris, C. (1976). Theories of action that inhibit individual learning. American Psychologist, 31(9), 638–654.Google Scholar
  3. Argyris, C. (1982). The executive mind and double-loop learning. Organizational Dynamics, 11(2), 5–22.Google Scholar
  4. Argyris, C. (1986). Skilled incompetence. Harvard Business Review, 64(5), 74–79.Google Scholar
  5. Argyris, C. (1989). Strategy implementation: An experience in learning. Organizational Dynamics, 18(2), 5–15.Google Scholar
  6. Barrows, H. (1996). Problem-based learning in medicine and beyond: A brief overview. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 68, 3–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bereiter, C. (1985). Toward a solution of the learning paradox. Review of Educational Research, 55(2), 201–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bereiter, C. (1991). Commentary. Human Development, 34, 294–298.Google Scholar
  9. Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1993). Surpassing ourselves: An inquiry into the nature and implications of expertise. Chicago, IL: Open Court.Google Scholar
  10. Blanchard, M., Southerland, S., & Granger, E. (2009). No silver bullet for inquiry: Making sense of teacher change following an inquiry-based research experience for teachers. Science Education, 93(2), 322–360.Google Scholar
  11. Burbules, N. (2008). Tacit teaching. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 40(5), 666–677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cavell, S. (2012). Philosophy as the education of grownups. In N. Saito & P. Standish (Eds.), Stanley Cavell and the education of grownups (pp. 19–32). New York: Fordham University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fodor, J. (1980). Fixation of belief and concept acquisition. In M. Piattelli-Palmarini (Ed.), Language and learning: The debate between Jean Piaget and Noam Chomsky (pp. 143–162). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Hmelo-Silver, C., & Barrows, H. (2008). Facilitating collaborative knowledge building. Cognition and Instruction, 26, 48–94.Google Scholar
  15. ​Hoffman, M. (2003). Peirce’s “diagrammatic reasoning” as a solution of the learning paradox. In G. Debrock (Ed.), Process pragmatism: Essays on a quiet philosophical revolution (pp. 121–143). Amsterdam, NY: Rodopi. Google Scholar
  16. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Luntley, M. (1999). Contemporary philosophy of thought: Truth, world, content. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  18. Luntley, M. (2007). Learning, empowerment and judgement. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 39, 418–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Luntley, M. (2008). Conceptual development and the paradox of learning. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 42(1), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Medina, J. (2002). The unity of Wittgenstein’s philosophy: Necessity, intelligibility, and normativity. Albany, NY: State University of New York.Google Scholar
  21. Minstrell, J. (1999). Expertise in teaching. In R. Sternberg & J. Horvath (Eds.), Tacit knowledge in professional practice: Researcher and practitioner perspectives (pp. 215–230). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  22. Moravcsik, J. (1978). Learning as recollection. In G. Vlastos (Ed.), Plato I: A collection of critical essays (Vol. 1). Metaphysics and epistemology (pp. 53–69). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
  23. Novak, J., & Gowin, D. (1984/2002). Learning how to learn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Oliveira, A. (2010). Improving teacher questioning in science inquiry discussions through professional development. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(4), 422–453.Google Scholar
  25. Plato. (1961). Meno. In The collected dialogues of Plato. E. Hamilton & H. Cairns Eds., W. K. C. Guthrie, Trans.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Plato. (1973). Theaetetus (J. McDowell, Trans.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Polanyi, M. (1967). The tacit dimension. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books–Doubleday.Google Scholar
  28. Prawat, R. (1999). Dewey, Peirce, and the learning paradox. American Educational Research Journal, 36(1), 47–76.Google Scholar
  29. Rogoff, B. (1995). Observing sociocultural activity on three planes: Participatory appropriation, guided participation, and apprenticeship. In J. Wertsch, P. del Rio, & A. Alvarez (Eds.), Sociocultural studies of mind (pp. 139–164). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rogoff, B., Matusov, E., & White, C. (1996). Models of teaching and learning: Participation in a community of learners. In D. Olson & N. Torrance (Eds.), Handbook of education and human development: New models of learning, teaching, and school (pp. 388–414). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  31. Schön, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  32. Schön, D. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  33. Schoenfeld, A., Minstrell, J., & van Zee, E. (1999). The detailed analysis of an established teacher’s non-traditional lesson. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 18(3), 281–325.Google Scholar
  34. Shanker, S. (1986). Introduction: Approaching the investigations. In S. Shanker (Ed.), Ludwig Wittgenstein: Critical assessments (Vol. 2, pp. 1–23). London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
  35. Smith, R. (1982). Learning how to learn: Applied theory for adults. New York: Cambridge.Google Scholar
  36. van Zee, E. (2000). Analysis of a student-generated inquiry discussion. International Journal of Science Education, 22(2), 115–142. Google Scholar
  37. van Zee, E., Marletta, I., Kurose, A., Simpson, D., & Wild, J. (2001). Student and teacher questioning during conversations about science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(2), 159–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. van Zee, E., & Minstrell, J. (1997a). Using questioning to guide student thinking. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 6(2), 227–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. van Zee, E., & Minstrell, J. (1997b). Reflective discourse: Developing shared understandings in a physics classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 19(2), 209–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. von. Glasersfeld, E. (2001). Scheme theory as a key to the learning paradox. In A. Philipp & J. Voneche (Eds.), Working with Piaget: Essays in honour of Barbel Inhelder (pp. 139–146). London: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  41. Williams, M. (1994). The significance of learning in Wittgenstein’s later philosophy. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 24(2), 173–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wittgenstein, L. (1956). Remarks on the foundations of mathematics (G. E. M. Anscombe, Trans.). Oxford: Basil Blackwell (RFM).Google Scholar
  43. Wittgenstein, L. (1958). Preliminary studies for the “Philosophical Investigations”: Generally known as the blue and brown books. Oxford: Basil Blackwell (BB).Google Scholar
  44. Wittgenstein, L. (1967). Zettel (G. E. M. Anscombe, Trans.). Oxford: Basil Blackwell (Z).Google Scholar
  45. Wittgenstein, L. (1968). Philosophical investigations (3rd ed., G. E. M. Anscombe, Trans.). Oxford: Basil Blackwell (PI§, or PI, pg.).Google Scholar
  46. Wittgenstein, L. (1969). On certainty (D. Paul & G. E. M. Anscombe, Trans.). Oxford: Basil Blackwell (OC).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of EducationYork UniversityTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations