Advertisement

Universal Grammar: Wittgenstein Versus Chomsky

  • Danièle Moyal-Sharrock
Chapter

Abstract

The motivations for the claim that language is innate are, for many, quite straightforward. The innateness of language is seen as the only way to solve the so-called logical problem of language acquisition : the mismatch between linguistic input and linguistic output. In this paper, I begin by unravelling several strands of the nativist argument, offering replies as I go along. I then give an outline of Wittgenstein’s view of language acquisition , showing how it renders otiose problems posed by nativists like Chomsky —not least by means of Wittgenstein’s own brand of grammar which, unlike Chomsky’s, does not reside in the brain, but in our practices .

Keywords

Wittgenstein Chomsky Universal grammar Nativism Language acquisition Training 

References

  1. Anderson, S. R., & Lightfoot, D. W. (2000). The human language faculty as an organ. Annual Review of Physiology, 62, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bates, E. (1993). Comprehension and production in early language development. Comments on Savage-Rumbaugh et al. in Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 58, 3–4, 222–242.Google Scholar
  3. Bates, E., & MacWhinney, B. (1989). Functionalism and the competition model. In B. MacWhinney & E. Bates (Eds.), The crosslinguistic study of sentence processing (pp. 3–76). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bickerton, D. (1984). The language bio-program hypothesis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 7, 173–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bishop, D. (2014). What Chomksy doesn’t get about child language. Figshare. doi: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1030403 Google Scholar
  6. Bruner, J. (1983). Child’s talk: learning to use language. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  7. Canfield, J. V. (1975; 1986). Anthropological science fiction and logical necessity. In J. V. Canfield (Ed.), The philosophy of Wittgenstein. Logical necessity and rules (Vol. 10, pp. 105–117). NY: Garland.Google Scholar
  8. Canfield, J. V. (1996). The community view. The Philosophical Review, 105(4), 469–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Canfield, J. V. (1997). Wittgenstein’s later philosophy. In J. V. Canfield (Ed.), Philosophy of meaning, knowledge and value in the twentieth century. Routledge history of philosophy (Vol. X, pp. 247–285). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Chomsky, N. (1972). Language and mind (Extended edition). Harcourt, Brace & World.Google Scholar
  11. Chomsky, N. (1980a). Rules and representations. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  12. Chomsky, N. (1980b). On cognitive structures and their development: A reply to Piaget. In M. Piatelli-Palmarin (Ed.), Language and learning: The debate between Jean Piaget and Noam Chomsky, (p. 35–54). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Chomsky, N. (1983). Things no amount of learning can teach. Noam Chomsky interviewed by John Gliedman. Omni, 6:11. http://www.chomsky.info/interviews/198311–.htm
  14. Chomsky, N. (1988). Language and the problems of knowledge. The Managna lectures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  15. Chomsky, N. (1993). Language and thought. London: Moyer Bell.Google Scholar
  16. Chomsky, N. (1995). The minimalist program (p. 1995). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  17. Chomsky, N. (2000). In N. Mukhergi, B. N. Patniak, & R. K. Agnihotri (Eds.) The “Chomskyan Era”, Extracted from The architecture of language. New Dehli, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press (Oxford India Paperbacks). Online.Google Scholar
  18. Christiansen, M. H., & Chater, N. (2008). Language as shaped by the brain. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 31, 489–509.Google Scholar
  19. Cook, V. J., & Newson, M. (2007). Chomsky’s universal grammar: An introduction (3rd ed.). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  20. Cowie, F. (2008). Innateness and language. Stanford encyclopaedia of philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/innateness-language/#toc
  21. Curtiss, S., et al. (1974). The development of language in Genie: A case of language acquisition beyond the “critical period”. Brain and Language, 1(1), 81–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dabrowska, E. (2010). Native vs. expert intuitions: An empirical study of acceptability judgements. The Linguistic Review, 27, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Deacon, T. (1997). The symbolic species: The co-evolution of language and the human brain. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  24. Dunn, M., Greenhill, S. J., Levinson, S. C., & Gray, R. D. (2011). Evolved structure of language shows lineage-specific trends in word-order universals. Nature, 473, 79–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Dye, M. (2010). The advantages of being helpless: Human brains are slow to develop—A secret, perhaps, of our success. Scientific American (February). http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/advantages-of-helpless/
  26. Evans, V. (2014). The language myth: Why language is not an instinct. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Evans, N., & Levinson, S. C. (2009). The myth of language universals: Language diversity and its importance for cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32, 429–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Everett, D. (2012). There is no such thing as universal grammar. Interview by R. McCrum. The Guardian, 25 March. http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2012/mar/25/daniel-everett-human-language-piraha
  29. Fortis, J.-M. (2008). Le langage est-il un instinct? Une critique du nativisme linguistique de Chomsky à Pinker. Texto! 13:4, http://www.revue-texto.net/index.php?id=1870
  30. Glock, H.-J. (1996). A Wittgenstein dictionary. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Glock, H.-J. (2013). Animal minds: A non-representationalist approach. APQ, 50(3), 213–232.Google Scholar
  32. Green, C. D. & Vervaecke, J. (1997). But what have you done for us lately? Some recent perspectives on linguistic nativism. In D. M. Johnson & C. E. Erneling (Eds.), The future of the cognitive revolution (pp. 149–163). OUP Online (not paginated).Google Scholar
  33. Hacker, P. M. S. (2007). The relevance of Wittgenstein’s philosophy of psychology to the psychological sciences. Proceedings of the Leipzig Conference on Wittgenstein and the Psychological Sciences (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  34. Hacker, P. M. S. (2010). Wittgenstein’s anthropological and ethnological approach. In J. Padilla Galvez (Ed.), Philosophical anthropology: Wittgenstein’s perspective (pp. 15–32). Ontos Verlag: Open Library.Google Scholar
  35. Hacker, P. M. S. (2015). Forms of life. Nordic Wittgenstein review. October, 1–20, 2015.Google Scholar
  36. Harrison, B. (1991). Inconvenient fictions: Literature and the limits of theory. Princeton: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Haugeland, J. (2002). Andy Clark on cognitive and representation. In H. Clapin (Ed.), Philosophy of mental representation (pp. 21–36). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  38. Hinzen, W. (2012a). The philosophical significance of universal grammar. Language Sciences, 34(5), 635–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hinzen, W. (2012b). Human nature and grammar. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement, 70, 53–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hudson Kam, C. L., & Newport, E. L. (2009). Getting it right by getting it wrong: When learners change languages. Cognitive Psychology, 59, 30–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hutto, D. D., & Myin, E. (2013). Radicalizing enactivism: Basic minds without content. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  42. MacWhinney, B. (1993). The (il)logical problem of language acquisition. In Proceedings of the Fifteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  43. MacWhinney, B., et al. (1989). Language learning: Cues or rules. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 255–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Medina, J. (2002). The unity of Wittgenstein’s philosophy: Necessity, intelligibility, and normativity. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  45. Moerk, E. L. (1994). Corrections in first language acquisition: Theoretical controversies and factual evidence. International Journal of Psycholinguistics, 10, 33–58.Google Scholar
  46. Montgomery, D. E. (2002). Mental verbs and semantic development. Journal of Cognition and Development, 3(4), 357–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Moyal-Sharrock, D. (2004). On Certainty and the grammaticalisation of experience. In D. Moyal-Sharrock (Ed.), The third Wittgenstein: The post-investigations works (pp. 43–62). Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  48. Moyal-Sharrock, D. (2007). Understanding Wittgenstein’s On Certainty. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  49. Moyal-Sharrock, D. (2013). Realism, but not empiricism: Wittgenstein versus Searle. In T. P. Racine & K. L. Slaney (Eds.), A Wittgensteinian perspective on the use of conceptual analysis in psychology (pp. 153–171). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Narboux, P. (2004). Jeux de langage et jeux de dressage: Sur la critique éthologique d’Augustin dans les Recherches philosophiques. In C. Lecerf (Ed.), Ludwig Wittgenstein. Europe (pp. 130–142). https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B51SrbZxU_McUjNqTTBWX1NJSzQ/view?usp=sharing&pref=2&pli=1
  51. Nelson, K. (2009). Wittgenstein and contemporary theories of word learning. New Ideas in Psychology, 27, 275–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Newport, E. L., Gleitman, H., & Gleitman, L. A. (1977). Mother, I’d rather do it myself: Some effects and non-effects of maternal speech style. In C. A. Snow & C. E. Ferguson (Eds.), Talking to children: Language input and acquisition (pp. 109–149). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Ramscar, M., Dye, M., & McCauley, S. M. (2013). Expectation and error distribution in language learning: The curious absence of “mouses” in adult speech. Language, 89(4), 760–793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Ramscar, M., & Yarlett, D. (2007). Linguistic self-correction in the absence of feedback: A new approach to the logical problem of language acquisition. Cognitive Science, 31, 927–960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Rorty, R. (2004). The brain as hardware, culture as software. Inquiry, 47, 219–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Saxe, R. (2008). The ape that teaches. Interview by PBS Nova. 1.1.2008. Online.Google Scholar
  57. Schoneberger, Ted. (2010). Three myths from the language acquisition literature. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 26, 107–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Singleton, D., & Ryan, L. (2004). Language acquisition: The age factor (2nd ed.). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  59. Tomasello, M. (1999). The cultural origins of human cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  60. Tomasello, M. (2008). Origins of human communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  61. Wittgenstein, L. (1961). Tractatus logico-philosophicus (D. F. Pears & B. F. McGuinness, Trans.). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul (TLP).Google Scholar
  62. Wittgenstein, L. (1969). The blue and brown books (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell (BB).Google Scholar
  63. Wittgenstein, L. (1970). Zettel (G. E. M. Anscombe & G. H. von Wright, Eds., G. E. M. Anscombe, Trans.). Berkeley: University of California Press (Z).Google Scholar
  64. Wittgenstein, L. (1977). On certainty, amended (1st ed., G. E. M. Anscombe & G. H. von Wright, Eds., D. Paul & G. E. M. Anscombe, Trans.). Oxford: Blackwell (OC).Google Scholar
  65. Wittgenstein, L. (1978). Remarks on the foundations of mathematics (3rd revised ed., G. H. von Wright, R. Rhees & G. E. M. Anscombe, Eds., G. E. M. Anscombe, Trans.). Oxford: Blackwell (RFM).Google Scholar
  66. Wittgenstein, L. (1979). Notes on logic. Appendix 1. Notebooks 1914–16 (2nd ed., pp. 93–107. G. E. M. Anscombe & G. H. von Wright Eds., G. E. M. Anscombe, Trans.), Oxford: Blackwell (N).Google Scholar
  67. Wittgenstein, L. (1980a). Remarks on the philosophy of psychology, (Vol. I, G. E. M. Anscombe & G. H. von Wright, Eds., G. E. M. Anscombe, Trans.). Oxford: Blackwell (RPP I).Google Scholar
  68. Wittgenstein, L. (1980b). Remarks on the philosophy of psychology, (Vol. II, G. H. von Wright & H. Nyman, Eds., C. G. Luckhardt & M.A.E. Aue, Trans.). Oxford: Blackwell (RPP II).Google Scholar
  69. Wittgenstein, L. (1988). Wittgenstein’s lectures on philosophical psychology 1946–47, notes by P. T. Geach, K. J. Shah & A. C. Jackson; P.T. Geach (Ed.). Hassocks: Harvester Press (LPP).Google Scholar
  70. Wittgenstein, L. (1993a). Cause and effect: Intuitive awareness. In J. C. Klagge & A. Nordman (Eds.), Philosophical occasions: 1912–1951 (pp. 371–426). Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing (PO I).Google Scholar
  71. Wittgenstein, L. (1993b). Moore’s Wittgenstein lectures in 1930–1933. In J. C. Klagge & A. Nordman (Eds.), Philosophical occasions: 1912–1951 (pp. 46–114). Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing (PO II).Google Scholar
  72. Wittgenstein, L. (1997a). Philosophical investigations (2nd ed., G. E. M. Anscombe, Trans.). Oxford: Blackwell (PI).Google Scholar
  73. Wittgenstein, L. (1997b). In R. Harré (Ed.) The principles of linguistic philosophy by F. Waismann (2nd ed.). London: Macmillan (PLP).Google Scholar
  74. Wittgenstein, L. (2001). In A. Ambrose (Ed.) Wittgenstein’s lectures: Cambridge, 1932–1935. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1979) (WL).Google Scholar
  75. Wittgenstein, L. (2005). In C. G. Luckhardt & M. A. E. Aue (Ed., Trans.) The big typescript: TS 213. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing (BT).Google Scholar
  76. Yarlett, D. & Ramscar, M. (2008). Language learning through similarity-based generalization. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  77. Young, M. W. (Ed.). (1979). The ethnography of Malinowski: The Trobriand Islands 1915–18. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of HertfordshireHatfieldUK

Personalised recommendations