Language and Mathematical Formation

Chapter

Abstract

Inspired by a certain reading of Wittgenstein, especially his notion of rule-following, this paper sketches an outline of an idea of elementary mathematics (arithmetic and basic geometry) as an intrinsic part of intellectual formation, or Bildung. In particular, I argue that we need to distinguish between mathematics as an activity and mathematics as a body of knowledge, where it is the first mentioned that is primary for the character of thinking. My claim is threefold: (i) The development of the capacity to think mathematically, together with the ability to read, write and speak one’s native tongue with clarity and precision, ought to be the primary aims of primary and secondary schooling; (ii) At this basic level, the capacity to think mathematically is inseparable from the capacity to reason in general and should be seen as an essential part of the latter; (iii) These two claims, if correct, have profound consequences for how we ought to think about the form and content of teaching.

Keywords

Arithmetic Benezet Bildung Literacy Wittgenstein 

References

  1. Arendt, H. (1961). The crisis in education. Between past and future. New York: Viking Press.Google Scholar
  2. Arendt, H. (1992). R. Beiner (Ed.). Lectures on Kant’s political philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  3. Benezet, L. P. (1935a). The teaching of arithmetic I: The story of an experiment. Journal of the National Education Association, 24(8), 241–244.Google Scholar
  4. Benezet, L. P. (1935b). The teaching of arithmetic II: The story of an experiment. Journal of the National Education Association, 24(9), 301–305.Google Scholar
  5. Benezet, L. P. (1935c). The teaching of arithmetic III: The story of an experiment. Journal of the National Education Association, 25(1), 7–8.Google Scholar
  6. Grève, S. (2014). Wittgenstein’s philosophy of mathematics: Felix Mühlhölzer in conversation with Sebastian Grève. Nordic Wittgenstein Review, 3(2), 151–179.Google Scholar
  7. Kant, I. (1964). Critique of judgment (Trans. and with analytical index: Meredith J. C.) Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  8. Martin, M. O., & Mullis, I. V. S. (Eds.). (2013). TIMSS and PIRLS 2011: Relationships among reading, mathematics, and science achievement at the fourth grade—Implications for early learning. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.Google Scholar
  9. Schroeder, S. (2015). Mathematics and forms of life (pp. 111–130). Special Issue, Wittgenstein and forms of life: Nordic Wittgenstein review.Google Scholar
  10. Serder, M., & Jakobsson, A. (2015). Language games and meaning as used in student encounters with scientific literacy test items. Science Education. doi:10.1002/sce.21199
  11. Stevenson, H., & Stigler, J. (1992). The learning gap: Why our schools are failing and what we can learn from Japanese and Chinese education. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  12. Stickney, J. (2015). Wittgenstein on rule-entanglement, contradictions and arbitrariness in educational language-games: “Where will the harm come?” Unpublished manuscript presented (See Stickney, 2017, in this volume, Ch 32.) at Philosophy of Education Society of Great Britain, Greynog Conference 2015: Orientations toward Wittgenstein.Google Scholar
  13. Unguru, S. (1975). On the need to rewrite the history of Greek mathematics. Archive for the History of Exact Sciences, 15(1), 67–114. Google Scholar
  14. Wittgenstein, L. (1969). In G. E. M. Anscombe & G. H. von Wright (Eds.). Über Gewissheit: On certainty. New York: Basil Blackwell (OC).Google Scholar
  15. Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations (G. E. M. Anscombe, Trans.). Oxford: Basil Blackwell (PI).Google Scholar
  16. Wittgenstein, L. (1978). Remarks on the foundations of mathematics. (3. ed., rev. and reset., (G. H. von Wright, R. Rhees & G. E. M. Anscombe Eds., G. E. M. Anscombe, Trans.). Oxford: Blackwell (RFM).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUppsala UniversityUppsalaSweden

Personalised recommendations