Wittgenstein and Judging the Soundness of Curriculum Reforms: Investigating the Math Wars

Chapter

Abstract

Wittgenstein’s rule-following argument draws considerable attention: its policy significance for education , very little. Confronted with rule deviation, what justifies claims to ‘sound’/‘unsound’ implementation of curricular reforms, or reasonable adaptation? Playing on John Mighton’s Possible Worlds scenario, I probe these questions on different planes of inquiry through similar vignettes, focused on his ethically aimed math training program (JUMP). Surveying the topic space, I first touch on fervent debate between Rorty and his critics, Putnam and McDowell , over ‘solidarity’ grounding judgment. Must ‘soundness’ claims be ‘answerable to the world,’ and if so, how do we justify our educational practices ? Is sharing a ‘sense’/‘sensibility’ (a fact/value) of ‘pedagogic soundness’ sufficient to uphold its veracity? I then explore the controversy between contending paradigms of discovery learning and Mighton’s guided training in math fundamentals, illustrating opposition between liberal-analytic definitions of teaching with training . In terms of student diversity, which possible worlds beckon account? Finally, drawing on Medina , we see the problem of encountering alien practices through the lens of ‘logical insanity.’ Faced with seemingly ‘unsound’ reforms, teacher resistance acts as healthy, conservative brakes; alternately, recalcitrance can normatively blind teachers to innovation, effectively stalling improvement in learning . Not an either/or in terms of grounding, balance is advocated between the need for (a) faithful immersion in demonstrative practices in order to understand (immanently) their sense within the flow of classroom life; and, (b) the professional need for reasons or warrants—liberal-analytic , rational justification motivating the exertion of energy needed to sustain change initiatives.

Keywords

Wittgenstein Mighton Mathematics training Discovery learning Liberal-analytic philosophy Rorty Putnam Mcdowell 

References

  1. Bornstein, D. (2011). A better way to teach math. The New York Times. April 18, 2011 8:30 pm, 296. http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/04/18/a-better-way-to-teach
  2. Burbules, N. (2000). Lyotard on Wittgenstein. In P. Dhillon & P. Standish (Eds.), Lyotard. Just education (pp. 36–53). London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Carlson, K. B. (2014). Math wars: The division over how to improve test scores. The Globe and Mail. Toronto. Friday, Jan. 10, 11:28 PM EST.Google Scholar
  4. Carr, D. (2003). Making sense of education: An introduction to the philosophy and theory of education and teaching. London: Routledge Falmer.Google Scholar
  5. Cavell, S. (1979). The claim of reason: Wittgenstein, skepticism, morality, and tragedy. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  6. Cavell, S. (1990). Conditions handsome and unhandsome. The constitution of Emersonian perfectionism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  7. Cioffi, F. (1998). Information, contemplation and social life. In Wittgenstein on Freud and Frazer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Dewey, J. (1944). Democracy and education. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  9. Dweck, C. S. (2012). Mindset: How you can fulfil your potential. UK: Constable & Robinson Limited.Google Scholar
  10. Dweck, C. S. (n.d.). Learning and the adolescent mind. http://learningandtheadolescentmind.org/people_01.html
  11. Forster, M. (2004). Wittgenstein on the arbitrariness of grammar. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Hirst, P. (1971). What is teaching? Journal of Curriculum Studies, 3(1), 5–18.Google Scholar
  13. Hunter, J. F. M. (1985). The harried mathematics instructor. In Understanding Wittgenstein: Studies of Philosophical Investigations. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Kant, I. (1904). The educational theory of Immanuel Kant (E. F. Buchner, Ed. and Trans., with introduction). Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott.Google Scholar
  15. Kerr, F. (1998). Truth in religion. In D. Carr (Ed.), Education, knowledge and truth. Beyond the postmodern impasse (pp. 68–79). London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Kuhn, T. (1996).  The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  17. Kripke, S. (1982). The Wittgensteinian paradox. In Wittgenstein on rules and private language. An elementary exposition. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  18. McCarthy, L. P., & McCarthy, D. C. (1995). Wittgenstein on the unreasonableness of education: Connecting teaching and meaning. In J. Marshall & P. Smeyers (Eds.), Philosophy and education: Accepting Wittgenstein’s challenge (pp. 63–76). Dordrecht, Boston and London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. McClellan, J. (1976). Philosophy of education. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  20. McDowell, J. (1998). Wittgenstein on following a rule. In: Mind, value, and reality. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  21. McDowell, J. (2000). Towards rehabilitating objectivity. In R. Brandom (Ed.), Rorty and his critics (pp. 109–123). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  22. McIlroy, A. (2010). Program could help kids get jump-start in math. Globe and Mail. Toronto. Friday, January 15, 2010. http://www.theglobeandmail.com/technology/science/program-could-help-kids-get-jump-start-in-math/article4187640/?page=all
  23. Medina, J. (2002). The unity of Wittgenstein’s philosophy. Necessity, intelligibility, and normativity. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  24. Medina, J. (2006). Speaking from elsewhere. A new contextualist perspective on meaning, identity, and discursive agency. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  25. Medina, J., & Wood, D. (Eds.). (2005). Truth. Engagements across philosophical traditions. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  26. Mighton, J. (1982). Imagination as method: Section xii, Part II of Wittgenstein’s Philosophical Investigations. McMaster University.Google Scholar
  27. Mighton, J. (2000). Possible worlds. Mystery|Sci-Fi|Crime—93 min (play & screenplay). Director: Robert Lepage. Starring Tilda Swinton, Tom McCamus, Sean McCann.Google Scholar
  28. Mighton, J. (2003). The myth of ability: Nurturing mathematical talent in every child. Toronto: House of Anansi Press.Google Scholar
  29. Mighton, J. (2007). The end of ignorance: Multiplying our human potential, a new way to think about your child’s education. Toronto: Vintage Canada, Random House.Google Scholar
  30. Mighton, J. (2010). The ubiquitous bell curve. Fields Institute for Research in Mathematical Science. October 18th. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hmpVOUrLqq8
  31. Mighton, J. (2012). If you could succeed in math, wouldn’t you tell yourself you could do anything? April 27th. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ezx0Yiz841Y
  32. Mighton, J. (2013). New techniques make math fun for all. Scientific American Mind, 24(4). http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/new-techniques-make-math-fun-for-all/
  33. Mighton, J. (2014). The math of learning|John Mighton|TEDxCERN. October 29th. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qbxnk5SKaTA
  34. Mulhall, S. (1990). On being in the world. Wittgenstein and Heidegger on seeing aspects. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  35. Mulhall, S. (2001). Seeing aspects. In H.-J. Glock (Ed.), Wittgenstein. A critical reader. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  36. Owen, D. (2003). Genealogy as perspicuous representation. In C. Heyes (Ed.), The grammar of politics. Wittgenstein and political philosophy. Ithica and London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Putnam, H. (2002). The collapse of the fact/value dichotomy and other essays. Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Ridley, A. (1998). Afterword. In R. G. Collingwood (Ed.), A philosophy of art. London: Phoenix Paperbacks, Orion Publishing.Google Scholar
  39. Rorty, R. (1989). Contingency, irony, and solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rorty, R. (1991). Cosmopolitanism without emancipation: A response to Jean-Francois Lyotard. In Objectivity, relativism and truth. Philosophical papers (Vol. 1). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Rorty, R. (1999). Philosophy and social hope. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  42. Rorty, R. (2006). In E. Mendieta (Ed.), Take care of freedom and truth will take care of itself. Interviews with Richard Rorty. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Rousseau, J.-J. (1979). Emile, or on education (A. Bloom, Trans.). New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  44. Savickey, B. (1999). Wittgenstein’s art of investigation. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  45. Savickey, B. (2017). Wittgenstein’s philosophy. In Viva voce. M. A. Peters & J. Stickney (Eds.), A companion to Wittgenstein on education: Pedagogical investigations (Chap. 4).  Singapore:Springer.Google Scholar
  46. Scheman, N. (1996). Forms of life: Mapping the rough ground. In H. Sluga & D. Stern, (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to Wittgenstein. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Siegel, H., & Phillips, D. C. (2013). Philosophy of education. Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/education-philosophy/
  48. Smeyers, P. (2008). Images and pictures: Seeing and imagining. In M. A. Peters, N. Burbules, & P. Smeyers (Eds.), Saying and doing: Wittgenstein as a pedagogical philosopher (Chap. 4). Boulder: Paradigm Press.Google Scholar
  49. Smeyers, P. (2017).  “This is simply what I do.” On the relevance of Wittgenstein’s alleged conservatism and the debate about Cavell’s legacy for children and grown-ups. In M. A. Peters & J. Stickney (Eds.), A companion to Wittgenstein on education: Pedagogical investigations (Chap. 16). Singapore: Springer.Google Scholar
  50. Spieker, B. (1991). Indoctrination: The suppression of critical dispositions. In B. Spieker & R. Straughan (Eds.), Freedom and indoctrination: International perspectives. London: Cassell.Google Scholar
  51. Stickney, J. (2005). Teaching and learning in Wittgenstein’s philosophic method. In K. Howe (Ed.), N. Burbules (Chief Ed.), Philosophy of education 2005, Philosophy of Education Society yearbook (pp. 299–307). University of Illinois at Champaign-Urbana.Google Scholar
  52. Stickney, J. (2006). Deconstructing discourses about ‘New paradigms of teaching’: A Foucaultian and Wittgensteinian perspective. Special edition on teaching. In M. A. Peters (Ed.), Educational Philosophy and Theory, 38(3), 327–371.Google Scholar
  53. Stickney, J. (2008a). Wittgenstein’s ‘Relativity’: Agreement in forms of life and training in language-games. In N. Burbules & P. Smeyers (Guest Eds.), M. A. Peters (Ed.), Special Edition on Wittgenstein, Educational Philosophy and Theory, 40(5), 621–637.Google Scholar
  54. Stickney, J. (2008b). Training and mastery of techniques in Wittgenstein’s later philosophy: A response to Michael Luntley. In N. Burbules & P. Smeyers (Guest Eds.), M. A. Peters (Ed.). Special Edition on Wittgenstein, Educational Philosophy and Theory (September), 40(5), 678–694.Google Scholar
  55. Stickney, J. (2009a). Wittgenstein’s contextualist approach to judging “sound” teaching: Escaping enthrallment in criteria-based assessments. In N. Burbules (Ed.), Educational Theory, 59(2), 197–216.Google Scholar
  56. Stickney, J. (2009b). Casting teachers into education reform and regimes of inspection: Resistance to normalization through self-governance (Chap. 14). In M. A. Peters, A. C. Besley, M. Olssen, S. Mauer, & S. Weber (Eds.), Governmentality studies in education. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  57. Stickney, J. (2011). Philosophy. Thinkers, theories & questions. Senior author and consultant. McGraw-Hill Ryerson.Google Scholar
  58. Stickney, J. (2012). Judging teachers: Foucault, governance and agency during education reforms. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 44 (6 August). Presented at the annual meeting of the Philosophy of Education Society of Great Britain (Oxford, New College, 2010).Google Scholar
  59. Stickney, J. (2014a). Wittgenstein for adolescents? Post-foundational epistemology in high school philosophy. In R. Smith (Ed.), Ethics and Education, 9(2), 201–219.Google Scholar
  60. Stickney, J. (2014b). Aesthetic judgment in dance. Paper presented for the Nordic Wittgenstein Society, 3rd Annual Meeting on Philosophy of Education (University of Southern Denmark; June, 2012). In G. Lazaroiu (Ed.), Liber amicorum: A philosophical conversation among friends. A Festschrift for Michael A. Peters. New York: Addelton Academic Publishers. (Reprinted in Psychosociological Issues in Human Resource Management, 3(2), 2015, 106–123).Google Scholar
  61. Stickney, J. (2015). System alignment and consensus discourse in reforms: School effectiveness frameworks and instructional rounds. Philosophical responses from Oakeshott, Mouffe and Rancière. Presented at the annual meeting of the Philosophy of Education Society of Great Britain (Oxford, New College, 2012). International Journal of Leadership in Education (Routledge), 18(4), 487–513.Google Scholar
  62. Stickney, J. (2017). Wittgenstein as educator. In M. A. Peters & J. Stickney (Eds.), A companion to Wittgenstein on education: Pedagogical investigations (Chap. 3). Singapore: Springer.Google Scholar
  63. Taylor, C. (1995). To follow a rule. In Philosophical arguments (pp. 165–180). Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  64. Taylor, C. (2004).  Modern social imaginaries.  Durham and London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  65. Toulmin, S. (1969). The uses of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  66. Tully, J. (2003). Wittgenstein and political philosophy. Understanding practices of critical reflection. In C. Heyes (Ed.), The grammar of politics. Wittgenstein and political philosophy (pp. 17–42). Ithica and London: Cornell University Press [originally, Political Theory (May 1989) 17(2), 172–204].Google Scholar
  67. Wittgenstein, L. (1956). Remarks on the foundation of mathematics (G. E. M. Anscombe, Trans.). Oxford: Basil Blackwell (RFM).Google Scholar
  68. Wittgenstein, L. (1958). Preliminary studies for the “Philosophical Investigations”: Generally known as the blue and brown books. Oxford: Basil Blackwell (BB).Google Scholar
  69. Wittgenstein, L. (1966). In C. Barrett (Ed.), Lectures & conversations on aesthetics, psychology and religious beliefs. Berkeley and London: University of California Press (LC).Google Scholar
  70. Wittgenstein, L. (1967). Zettel (G. E. M. Anscombe, Trans.). Oxford: Basil Blackwell (Z).Google Scholar
  71. Wittgenstein, L. (1968). Philosophical investigations (3rd ed., G. E. M. Anscombe, Trans.). Oxford: Basil Blackwell (PI§, or PI, pg.).Google Scholar
  72. Wittgenstein, L. (1969). On certainty (D. Paul & G. E. M. Anscombe, Trans.). Oxford: Basil Blackwell (OC).Google Scholar
  73. Wittgenstein, L. (1976). In C. Diamond (Ed.), Wittgenstein’s lectures on the foundations of mathematics. New York: Harvester Press (LFM).Google Scholar
  74. Wittgenstein, L. (1979). A. Ambrose (Ed.), Wittgenstein’s lectures, Cambridge, 1932-35. Oxford: Blackwell (WL).Google Scholar
  75. Wittgenstein, L. (1980). Culture and value. (G. H. von Wright Ed., in collaboration with H. Nyman and P. Winch, Trans.). Oxford: Basil Blackwell (CV).Google Scholar
  76. Wittgenstein, L. (1982). Last writings on the philosophy of psychology, (Vol. 1), Preliminary studies for part II of “Philosophical Investigations.” (G. H. von Wright & H. Nyman Eds., C. G. Lukhardt & M. A. E. Aue, Trans.). Oxford: Blackwell (LW I).Google Scholar
  77. Wittgenstein, L. (1993). In J. C. Klagge & A. Nordmann (Eds.), Philosophical occasions (1912-1951). Indianapolis and Cambridge: Hackett (PO).Google Scholar
  78. Wright, C. (2001). Rails to infinity: Essays on themes from Wittgenstein’s Philosophical Investigations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of TorontoTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations