Wittgenstein and Foucault: The Limits and Possibilities of Constructivism

Chapter

Abstract

Marshall (1995) once argued that Wittgenstein’s social constructivist view of mathematics is not ‘idealistic’, ‘relativistic’ or ‘subjectivistic’ but rather is ‘non-idealistic and objective’. Wittgenstein is not idealistic because he attacks the prioritizing of mental states over linguistic accompaniments of those internal states. What he emphasizes is not intuition or mental process but the use of language . This, says Marshall , is an objective criterion, for although mathematics is ‘invented’ rather than ‘discovered’, the manner of its invention is in the form of discursive construction and in this sense it is independent of the individuals who use it as are the criteria of the truth and falsity of its propositions . It is thus non-foundational in the Russellian/Fregian senses. Rather, its objectivity is guaranteed by understanding mathematical objects within a formal language system. Truth in this sense depends on correct derivation in terms of the rule structure of the ‘language game’ relative to a ‘form of life’. Truth is thus ‘internal to a scheme’. In this article, I compare Wittgenstein to Foucault with respect to the issues of idealism , scepticism and language to highlight some of the main issues which seem to me central to any serious consideration of the limits and possibilities of social constructivism. These relate to (1) the central differences between radical constructivism and social constructionism, and (2) the extent to which the problem of relativism is overcome by Wittgenstein and Foucault making comparisons between the two thinkers. In completing these tasks, I will also consider some of the contributions of Foucault to the constructionist debate.

Keywords

Idealism Constructivism Foucault Wittgenstein Discourse Language 

References

  1. Armstrong, D. (1986). The invention of infant mortality. Sociology of Health & Illness, 8, 211–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words (2nd ed. 1975). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bakhtin, M. M. (1998). The dialogic imagination: Four essays. M. Holquist (Ed.); C. Emerson, & M. Holquist (Trans.), Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  4. Barrett, M. (1988). The politics of truth. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  5. Davidson, D. (1985). On the very idea of a conceptual scheme. In J. Rajchman & C. West (Eds.), Post analytic philosophy. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Deleuze, G. (1988). Foucault (S. Hand, Trans., p. 106). Minneapolis: University of Minneapolis Press.Google Scholar
  7. Foucault, M. (1970). The order of things. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
  8. Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge (A. Sheridan, Trans.). New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
  9. Foucault, M. (1973). Madness and civilization: A history of insanity in the age of reason (R. Howard, Trans.). New York: Vintage/Random House.Google Scholar
  10. Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  11. Foucault, M. (1978). An introduction: The history of sexuality (Vol. 1). New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  12. Foucault, M. (1980). Truth and power. In C. Gordon (Ed.), Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings (pp. 1972–1977). Brighton: Harvester Press.Google Scholar
  13. Foucault, M. (1986). The care of the self: History of sexuality, (Vol. 3, R. Hurley, Trans.). New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
  14. Foucault, M. (2011) Speech begins after death. In Conversation with Claude Bonnefoy (P. Artières Eds., Robert Bononno Trans.). Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  15. Foucault, M. (2015) Mad language. In P. Artièries, J.-F. Bert, M. Potte-Bonneville & J. Revel (Eds.), Language, madness and desire: On literature, (Robert Bononno, Trans.) (pp. 25–39). Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  16. Garfinkel, H. (1989). Studies in ethnomethodogy. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  17. Gutting, G. (1989). Michel Foucault’s archaeology of scientific reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gutting, G. (Ed.). (1994). The Cambridge companion to Foucault. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Hacking, I. (1979). Michel Foucault’s immature science. Nous, 13, 39–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hacking, I. (1985). Styles of scientific reasoning. In J. Rajchman & C. West (Eds.), Post analytic philosophy. New York: Columbia University Press (pp. 145–165).Google Scholar
  21. Hacking, I. (1986). Making up people. In T. C. Heller, M. Sosna & D. E. Wellbery, Reconstructing individualism: Autonomy, individuality and the self in Western thought (pp. 222–236). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Hacking, I. (2002). Historical ontology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Marshall, J. D. (1995) Wittgenstein and Foucault: Resolving philosophical puzzles. In J. Marshall & P. Smeyers (Eds.), Philosophy and education: Accepting Wittgenstein’s challenge. Dordrecht, Boston and London: Kluwer Academic Publishers. (Reprinted from Studies in Philosophy and Education, 14(2–3)).Google Scholar
  24. May, T. (1997). Reconsidering difference: Nancy, Derrida, Levinas, and Deleuze. Pennsylvania: The Pennsylvania University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Nettleton, S. (1994). Inventing mouths: Disciplinary power and dentistry. In C. James & R. Porter (Eds.), Reassessing Foucault: Power, medicine and the body. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Poster, M. (1984). Foucault, Marxism, history: Mode of production v’s mode of information. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  27. Putnam, H. (1997). Mind, language, reality. In Philosophical papers. (Vol. 2). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Rabinow, P. (Ed.), (1984). The Foucault reader. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  29. Rose, N. (1990). Governing the soul. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. Rose, N. (1994). Medicine, history and the present. In C. James & R. Porter (Eds), Reassessing Foucault, pp. 48–72, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  31. Rousse, J. (1994). Power/knowledge. In G. Gutting (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to Foucault. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Schatzki, T. R. (2001a). Practice minded orders. In T. R. Schatzki, K. K. Cetina, & E. von Savigny (Eds.), The practice turn in contemporary theory (pp. 42–55). London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  33. Schatzki, T. R. (2001b). Introduction: Practice theory. In T. R. Schatzki, K. K. Cetina, & E. von Savigny (Eds.), The practice turn in contemporary theory. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 1–14.Google Scholar
  34. Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Simhony, A. (1991). Idealist organicism: Beyond holism and individualism. History of Political Thought, 12(3), 515–535.Google Scholar
  36. Smart, B. (1983). Foucault, Marxism, critique. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  37. Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations (3rd ed., G.E.M. Anscombe, Trans.). New York: Macmillan (PI).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Political Theory and Education Policy in the Department of PoliticsUniversity of SurreyGuildfordUK

Personalised recommendations