Skip to main content

Practice Architectures of University Education

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Practice Theory Perspectives on Pedagogy and Education

Abstract

This chapter aims to challenge the narrative of the university in decline in the late twentieth and early twenty-first centuries, by showing how earlier forms of university life and practice persist within emerging forms. It uses the resources of practice theory—more precisely, the theory of practice architectures —to illuminate the analysis. The chapter proceeds in five main steps. First, the theory of practice architectures is outlined. Second, three vignettes of Australian university life in different eras (1964, 1987, 2015) are presented. These give a sense of the changes underway in Australian university life and practice; each is briefly contextualised by reference to a specific university at the time, and in relation to wider Australian culture , economy, and society and politics. Third, the notion of ‘practice landscapes’ is used to interpret and characterise the ‘look and feel’ of Australian university life and practice across the three periods being explored. We describe the university of 1964 as the juridical university, the university of 1987 as the negotiated university, and the university of 2015 as the entrepreneurial university . Fourth, we return to the notion of practice architectures to show how multiple forms of university life and practice have coexisted over time, with earlier forms persisting within later ones. Finally, we draw the argument to its conclusion, namely, that change in the life and practice of (some) Australian universities 1964–2015 is not a linear progress (or regress) in which earlier forms of the university are destroyed and replaced, but, rather, a complex process in which earlier forms are sedimented and displaced within contemporary university life and practice as a contested terrain. We think this alternative perspective offers scope and hope for transformative action for recovery and renewal in the Australian university.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Schatzki (2012, p. 14) described practices as “open-ended, spatially temporally dispersed nexus[es] of doings and sayings”.

  2. 2.

    The theory also takes up Schatzki’s (2002) point that practices can occur in multiple sites at a time, and that practices can be the sites of other practices, for example teaching practice can be the site of assessment practices.

  3. 3.

    This was also the case for academic staff.

  4. 4.

    The Commonwealth Sex Discrimination Act was passed two decades later (1984).

  5. 5.

    The University officially changed its name to James Cook University in 1998.

  6. 6.

    The Faculty of Education no longer exists as such. Education is located within the College of Arts, Society and Education.

  7. 7.

    The reforms were named after the Federal minister responsible for the reform, John Dawkins (see Australian Government 1988). Note that James Cook University was known in the late 1980s and 1990s as a ‘pre-Dawkins’ university. The university’s amalgamation with the Townsville College of Advanced Education in 1982 pre-dated the Dawkins reforms.

  8. 8.

    A precursor to AUSTUDY and Youth Allowance.

  9. 9.

    HECS was modified in 1996 and then replaced in 2005 by HECS-HELP, a similar user-pays, loan-based scheme.

  10. 10.

    Stands for ‘my Learning Management System’.

  11. 11.

    At such moments, ‘Professor K’ speaks the kind of discourse Bernstein (1996, p. 46) calls regulative discourse.

  12. 12.

    We draw here on the old distinction between ‘the rule of law’ and the ‘rule of men’ [sic], in which the latter is prone to arbitrariness and whim of rulers, whether tyrants, monarchs or elected officials.

  13. 13.

    ‘Masters’ in the sense that they were holders of the degree of Master. Le Goff (2011, p. 84) writes that ‘The [medieval] universities were … universitates magistrorum et scolarium, or corporations of masters and students, though they varied to a greater or lesser extent from each other, from Bologna where the students were in control, to Paris which was ruled by the masters.’

References

  • Altbach, P. G., Reisberg, L., & Rumbley, L. E. (2009). Trends in global higher education: Tracking an academic revolution (A report prepared for the UNESCO 2009 World Conference on Higher Education). Retrieved from http://atepie.cep.edu.rs/public/Altbach,_Reisberg,_Rumbley_Tracking_an_Academic_Revolution,_UNESCO_2009.pdf

  • Australian Government. (2015). Export income to Australia from international education activity in 2014. Retrieved from https://internationaleducation.gov.au/research/Research-Snapshots/Documents/Export%20Income%20CY2014.pdf

  • Ball, S. J. (2012). Performativity, commodification and commitment: An I-spy guide to the neoliberal university. British Journal of Educational Studies, 60(1), 1728. doi:10.1080/00071005.2011.650940

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, R. (2011). Being a university. Oxford: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, B. (1996). Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity: Theory, research, critique. London: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackmore, J., Brennan, M., & Zipin, L. (2010). Re-positioning university governance and academic work: An overview. In J. Blackmore, M. Brennan, & L. Zipin (Eds.), Re-positioning university governance and academic work (pp. 1–16). Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, P. (1971). The world of late antiquity AD 150–750: From Marcus Aurelius to Muhammed. London: Thames and Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calhoun, C. (2006). The university and the public good. Thesis Eleven, 84(1), 7–43. doi:10.1177/0725513606060516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, B. (2001). Australian higher education financing: Issues for reform. The Australian Economic Review, 34(2), 195–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connell, R. (2012). MyUniversity: Notes on neoliberalism and knowledge for the consideration of the Academic Board. Retrieved from http://www.raewynconnell.net/search/label/neoliberalism

  • Connell, R. (2013). The neoliberal cascade and education: An essay on the market agenda and its consequences. Critical Studies in Education, 54(2), 99–112. doi:10.1080/17508487.2013.776990

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, B., & Petersen, E. B. (2005). Neo-liberal discourse and the academy: The forestalling of (collective) resistance. Learning and Teaching in the Social Sciences, 2(2), 77–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbon, E. (1776–1789/1993). The history of the decline and fall of the Roman Empire, 6 vols. Originally published 1776–1789; 1993 Everyman Edition: New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giroux, H. A. (2010). Bare pedagogy and the scourge of neoliberalism: Rethinking higher education as a democratic public sphere. Educational Forum, 74(3), 184–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, P. (2000). The politics of economic change in the 1980s and 1990s. In D. Gruen & S Shrestha (Eds.), Conference proceedings: The Australian economy in the 1990s 24–25 July, 2000, Kirribilli. Economic Group, Reserve Bank of Australia. Retrieved from http://www.rba.gov.au/publications/confs/2000/pdf/kelly-address.pdf

  • Kemmis, S. (2010). Research for praxis: Knowing doing. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 18(1), 9–27. Available online via: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14681360903556756

  • Kemmis, S. (2014). Education, educational research and the good for humankind. In H. L. T. Heikkinen, J. Moate & M. K. Lerkkanen (Eds.), Enabling education: Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Finnish Educational Research Association FERA 2013 (Research in Educational Sciences 66) (pp. 15–67). Jyväskylä: Finnish Educational Research Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemmis, S., & Grootenboer, P. (2008). Situating praxis in practice: Practice architectures and the cultural, social and material conditions for practice. In S. Kemmis & T. Smith (Eds.), Enabling praxis: Challenges for education (pp. 37–62). Rotterdam: Sense.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemmis, S., Heikkinen, H., Fransson, G., Aspfors, J., & Edwards-Groves, C. (2014a). Mentoring of new teachers as a contested practice: Supervision, support and collaborative self-development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 43(2014), 154–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemmis, S., Wilkinson, J., Edwards-Groves, C., Hardy, I., Grootenboer, P., & Bristol, L. (2014b). Changing practices, changing education. Singapore: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Goff, J. (2011). Medieval civilization: 400–1500, trans. J. Barrow. London: The Folio Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A. (1981). After virtue: A study in moral theory. London: Duckworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A. (1990). Three rival versions of moral enquiry: Encyclopaedia, genealogy and tradition. London: Duckworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahon, K. (2014). Critical pedagogical praxis in higher education. Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.), Charles Sturt University, Brisbane, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahon, K., Kemmis, S., Francisco, S., & Lloyd, A. (2016). Practice theory and the theory of practice architectures. In K. Mahon, S. Francisco, & S. Kemmis (Eds.), Exploring education and professional practiceThrough the lens of practice architectures. Singapore: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marginson, S. (2004). The dynamics of competition in higher education: The Australian case in global context. Retrieved from http://apo.org.au/research/dynamics-competition-higher-education-australiancase-global-context

  • Marginson, S., & Considine, M. (2000). The enterprise university: Power, governance and reinvention in Australia. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, C., Pitton, V., Soochul, K., & Monje, D. (2009). Re-ordering the organization of knowledge in schooling and the university in a time of globalisation and neoliberalism. In J. Satterwaite, H. Piper, & P. Sikes (Eds.), Power in the academy (pp. 35–60). Trent on Stoke, UK: Trentham Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielson, L. (2010). Chronology of superannuation and retirement income in Australia. Parliament of Australia. Retrieved from http://www.aph.gov.au/binaries/library/pubs/bn/eco/chron_superannuation.pdf

  • Nixon, J. (2011). Higher education and the public good: Imagining the university. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. C. (1997). Cultivating humanity: A classical defense of reform in liberal education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olssen, M., & Peters, M. (2005). Neoliberalism, higher education and the knowledge economy: From the free market to knowledge capitalism. Journal of Education Policy, 20(3), 313–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pascal, B. (1966). Pensees, trans. A. J. Krailsheimer. London: Penguin Books (Originally published 1660).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pew Research Center. (2014). Millenials in adulthood: Detached from institutions, networked with friends. Retrieved from http://www.pewsocialtrends.org/files/2014/03/2014-03-07_generations-report-version-for-web.pdf

  • Pusey, M. (1991). Economic rationalism in Canberra: A nation-building state changes its mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schatzki, T. (2002). The site of the social: A philosophical account of the constitution of social life and change. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schatzki, T. (2010). The timespace of human activity: On performance, society, and history as indeterminate teleological events. Lanham, MD: Lexington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schatzki, T. (2012). A primer on practices: Theory and research. In J. Higgs (Ed.), Practice-based education: Perspectives and strategies (pp. 13–26). Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Shore, C., & Wright, S. (2004). Whose accountability? Governmentality and the auditing of universities. Parallax, 10(2), 100–116. doi:10.1080/1353464042000208558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Star, C., & Hammer, S. (2008). Teaching generic skills: Eroding the higher purpose of universities, or an opportunity for renewal? Oxford Review of Education, 34(2), 237–251. doi:10.1080/03054980701672232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stokes, J. (n.d.). Background to the 1986 and 1987 Cabinet records. Retrieved from http://www.naa.gov.au/collection/explore/cabinet/by-year/1986-87/essay.aspx

  • Tight, M. (2013). Institutional churn: Institutional change in United Kingdom higher education. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 35(1), 1120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomlinson, B., & Lipsitz, G. (2013). Insubordinate spaces for intemperate times: Countering the pedagogies of neoliberalism. Review of Education, Pedagogy, and Cultural Studies, 35(1), 3–2. doi:10.1080/10714413.2013.753758

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, M. (2002). Pedagogy and the politics and purposes of higher education. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 1(1), 43–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zipin, L., & Brennan, M. (2003). The suppression of ethical dispositions through managerial governmentality: A habitus crisis in Australian higher education. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 6(4), 351–370. doi:10.1080/1360312032000150742

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephen Kemmis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kemmis, S., Mahon, K. (2017). Practice Architectures of University Education. In: Grootenboer, P., Edwards-Groves, C., Choy, S. (eds) Practice Theory Perspectives on Pedagogy and Education. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3130-4_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3130-4_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-3128-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-3130-4

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics