Abstract
Sustainability of businesses has become a moot point for industrialised as well as fast industrialising economies. In the movement towards sustainability of businesses or organisations thus far, two polar positions are clearly seen:
-
(a)
Macroview/overall broad perspective of how the world is likely to shape up, the position an industry should take, etc. have dominated the argument space.
-
(b)
Action strategies for organisations by elite fora such as the World Business Council for Sustainable Development.
It is argued here that while these polar positions are useful for creating ends of the spectrum, organisations need greater clarity on what needs to be done. For an organisation to be committed to sustainability, there have to be strong internal systems in place, and the members of the organisation itself become the key stakeholders who should first accept the idea of creating a sustainable organisation. The internal requirements of an organisation and the understanding of “sustainability” as an approach towards organising would be imperative for leaders as they create and run the organisation. The idea is that internal compliance and thoughtful action by the organisation in relation to its context is more important than mere completion of activity. It would require organisations and their bosses to think in an entirely different manner—that shall not just be limited to reporting compliance. In other words, arguments will be made in favour of making “sustainability” a core value in our organisations that is deeply embedded in the culture of the organizations. The focus for organisations, thus, has to be internal as well. It is only when the organisations themselves become aware of the needs of those they influence; there is greater hope of responsible voluntary action—that could result in true sustainability throughout the life of the organisation.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Banerjee, S. B. (2011). Embedding sustainability across the organization: A critical perspective. Academy of Management Learning and Education., 10(4), 719–731.
Bansal, P. (2002). The corporate challenges of sustainable development. Academy of Management Executive, 16(2), 122–131.
Bansal, P. (2005). Evolving sustainability: A longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development. Strategic Management Journal, 26, 197–218.
Bansal, P., & DesJardine, M. (2014). Business sustainability: It is about time. Strategic Organization, 12(1), 70–78.
Confino, J. (2013, October 2). Interview: Unilever’s Paul Polman on diversity, purpose and profits. The Guardian. Retrieved January 17, 2017 from https://www.theguardian.com/sustainable-business/unilverceo-paul-polman-purpose-profits.
Epstein, M. J. (2008). Making sustainability work: Best practices in managing and measuring corporate, social and environmental impacts. Sheffield, UK: Greenleaf.
Epstein, M. J., & Roy, M. J. (2001). Sustainability in action: Identifying and measuring the key performance driver. Long Range Planning, 34, 585–604.
Garza, F. A. (2013). A framework for strategic sustainability in organizations: A three pronged approach. Journal of Comparative International Management., 16(1), 23–36.
Haugh, H. M., & Talwar, A. (2010). How do corporations embed sustainability across the organization? Academy of Management Learning and Education., 9(3), 384–396.
Hahn, T., Preuss, L., Pinkse, J., & Figge, F. (2014). Cognitive frames in corporate sustainability: Managerial sensemaking with paradoxical and business case frames. Academy of Management Review, 39, 463–487.
Ryssdal, K. (2013, June 11). Unilever CEO: For sustainable business, go against ‘mindless consumption’. Marketplace.org. Retrieved January 17, 2017 from https://www.marketplace.org/2013/06/11/sustainability/consumed/unilever-ceo-sustainable-business-go-against-mindless-consumption.
Schein, E. H. (2008). Leadership and organizational culture. New York: Jossey-Bass.
Schneider, A., & Meins, E. (2012). Two dimensions of corporate sustainability assessment: Towards a comprehensive framework. Business Strategy and the Environment, 21, 211–222.
Strand, R. (2014). Strategic leadership of corporate sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics, 123, 687–706.
Szekely, F., & Knirsch, M. (2005). Responsible leadership and corporate social responsibility: Metrics for sustainable performance. European Management Journal, 23, 628–647.
Van Marrewijk, M., & Were, M. (2003). Multiple levels of corporate sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics, 44, 107–119.
Wolf, J. (2014). The relationship between sustainable supply chain management, stakeholder pressure, and corporate sustainability performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 123, 317–328.
World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Report of the world commission on environment and development: Our common future. Retrieved from http://www.un-documents.net/ourcommon-future.pdf.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Goel, A. (2017). Embedding Sustainability in Organisational Action and Thought. In: Sarkar, R., Shaw, A. (eds) Essays on Sustainability and Management. India Studies in Business and Economics. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3123-6_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3123-6_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-3122-9
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-3123-6
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)