Skip to main content

Coupling Phytoremediation Appositeness with Bioenergy Plants: A Sociolegal Perspective

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Phytoremediation Potential of Bioenergy Plants

Abstract

The humanity has already started to experience the wrath of anthropogenic pollution of environment, primarily due to mindless development based upon non-renewable energy resources. Realising the need to have an environmentally friendly development along with the adoption of natural methods for corrective action to revitalise the environment, scientists are constantly engaged in developing new technologies. Biofuel production and phytoremediation techniques are practical manifestation of such an effort. However, these technologies do bear certain signs of aberration when not applied judiciously. This chapter briefly discusses some of the significant sociolegal concerns connected with the implementation of biofuel programmes and phytoremediation techniques in practical world.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ackrill R, Kay A (2014) The growth of biofuels in 21st century: policy drivers and market challenge. Palgrave MacMillan, Hampshire

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Anghie A (1999) Finding the peripheries: sovereignty and colonialism in nineteenth century international law. Harv Int J 40(1):1–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Applegate JS, Aman AC (2001) Introduction—syncopated sustainable development (sustainable development, agriculture, and the challenge of genetically modified organism symposium). Indiana J Glob Leg Stud 9(1):1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacaёr N (2011) A short history of mathematical population dynamics. Springer, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Balat M et al (2007) Influence of fossil fuel energy applications on environmental pollution. Energy Source, Part B: Econ Plan Policy 2(3):213–226

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Biofuels Act (2006) Republic of the Philippines http://www.doe.gov.ph/issuances/republic-act/614-ra-9367. Accessed May 2016

  • Bretschger L, Vinogradova A (2016) Human development at risk: economic growth with pollution-induced health shocks. https://www.ethz.ch/content/dam/ethz/special-interest/mtec/cer-eth/resource-econ-dam/documents/people/lbretschger/Health_25.01.2016_new.pdf. Accessed April 2016

  • Chen Y (2016) Trade, food security, and human rights: the rules for international trade in agricultural products and the evolving world food crisis. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Chowdhry K (1988) Growth or survival? India Int Cent Q 15(4):191–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark WC, Dickson NM (2003) Sustainability science: the emerging research programme. http://www.pnas.org/content/100/14/8059.full.pdf. Accessed Apr 2016

  • Colbran N (2011) Indigenous peoples in Indonesia: at risk of disappearing as distinct peoples in the rush for biofuel. Int J Minor Gr Right 18:63–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • COP 8 Decision VIII/27 (2006) Alien species that threaten ecosystems, habitats, or species (Article 8(h)): further considerations of gaps and inconsistencies in international regulatory framework. https://www.cbd.int/decision/cop/default.shtml?id=11041. Accessed May 2016

  • Dahiya A (2014) Bioenergy—biomass to biofuels: an overview. In: Dahiya A (ed) Bioenergy: biomass to biofuels. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 1–36

    Google Scholar 

  • David AP, Wright G (1997) Increasing returns and the genesis of American resource abundance. Ind Corp Chang 6(2):203–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demirbas A (2007) Producing and using bioethanol as an automotive fuel. Energy Sources, Part B: Econ Plan Policy 2(4):391–401

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Demirbas A (2008a) Biofuels: securing the planet’s future energy needs. Springer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Demirbas A (2008b) The importance of bioethanol and biodiesel from biomass. Energy Sources, Part B: Econ Plan Policy 3(2):177–185

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Directive 2009/28/EC (2009) Directive 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the council on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources and amending and subsequently repealing directives 2001/77//EC and 2003/30/EC. Off J Eur Union L(140):16–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Directive 2009/30/EC (2009) Fuel quality Directive. Off J Eur Union L(140):88–113

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolan TC, Glynn BA (1997) New treatment technologies and some significant regulatory changes. Environ Claim J 10(1):113–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards EJ et al (2010) The origins of C4 grasslands: integrating evolutionary and ecosystem science. Science 328:587–591

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein A (2014) The moral case for fossil fuels. Penguin, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Faramelli NJ (1971–1972) Perilous links between economic growth, justice and ecology: a challenge for economic planners. Environ Aff 1(1):218–227

    Google Scholar 

  • Forseth IN, Finnis AF (2004) Kudzu (Pueraria montana): history, physiology, and ecology combine to make major ecosystem threat. Crit Rev Plant Sci 23(5):401–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman J (2015) A critical look at “the moral case for fossil fuels”. Energy Law Rev 36(2):327–354

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadgil M, Guha R (1995) Ecology and equity. Penguin, Gurgaon

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher Ed (2008) The Gallagher review of the indirect effects of biofuels production. https://www.unido.org/fileadmin/user_media/UNIDO_Header_Site/Subsites/Green_Industry_Asia_Conference__Maanila_/GC13/Gallagher_Report.pdf. Accessed May 2016

  • Gherasim ME, Tānase G (2012) Fundamentals of sustainable development. Contemp Read Law Soc Justice 4(1):446–456

    Google Scholar 

  • Goh CS, Lee KT (2010) A visionary and conceptual marcoalgae-based third-generation bioethanol (TGB) biorefinery in Sabah, Malaysia as an underlay for renewable and sustainable development. Renew Sust Energ Rev 14:842–848

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hamby DM (1996) Site remediation techniques supporting environmental restoration activities – a review. Sci Total Environ 191(3):203–224

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hart J (2008) The poor of the planet and the planet of the poor: ecological ethics and economic liberation. Univ St Thomas Law J 5(1):144–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartman BJ (2013) Biomass-based diesel: fueling the renewable fuel standard. LSU J Energy Law Resour 1(2):123–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrera AM, Dudley TL (2003) Reduction of riparian arthropod abundance and diversity as a consequence of Gian Reed (Arundo donax) invasion. Biol Invasions 5(3):167–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HööK M, Tang X (2013) Depletion of fossil fuel and anthropogenic climate change —a review. Energy Policy 52:797–809

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hubbert MK (1956) Nuclear energy and fossil fuels: API conference, San Antonio, TX, (March 7–9 1956). Subsequently published as Publication no. 95, Shell Development Co. (June 1956)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennings MJ (2007) Bioenergy: fueling the future. Drake J Agric Law 12(1):205–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Kathi S (2016) Bioenergy from phytoremediated phytomass of aquatic plants via gasification. In: Prasad MNV (ed) Bioremediation and bioeconomy. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 111–128

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Khan FI et al (2004) An overview of site remediation technologies. J Environ Manag 71:95–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein N (2014) This changes everything: capitalism vs. the climate. Penguin Random House, Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  • Lederer EM (2007) UN expert calls biofuels a crime against humanity. Live Science. Accessed Apr 2016

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee RA, Lavoie JM (2013) From first-to-third generation biofuels: challenges of producing a commodity from a biomass of increasing complexity. Anim Front 3(2):6–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lima MGB (2009) Biofuel governance and international legal principles: is it equitable and sustainable. Melbourne J Int Law 10(2):470–492

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu L et al (2007) Mitigating environmental pollution and impacts from fossil fuels: the role of alternative fuels. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery Util Environ Eff 29(12):1069–1080

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malins C et al. (2014) A guide for the perplexed to the indirect effects of biofuels production. http://www.theicct.org/sites/default/files/publications/ICCT_A-Guide-for-the-Perplexed_Sept2014.pdf.. Accessed May 2016

  • Malthus TR (1798) An essay on the principles of pollution. J. Johnson, in St. Paul’s Church-yard, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Marques APGC et al (2009) Remediation of heavy metal contaminated soils: phytoremediation as a potentially promising clean-up technology. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 39:622–654

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McAllister L (2008) America is dying and the hospital’s power is shut off: the health care industry’s debilitating reliance on nonrenewable energy. Quinnipaic Health Law J 12(1):69–114

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarl BA, Boadu FO (2009) Bioenergy and U.S. renewable fuels standard: law, economic, policy/climate change and implementation concerns. Drake J Agric Law 14(1):43–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Meadows DH et al (1972) The limits to growth. Universe Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Meagher RB (2000) Phytoremediation of toxic elemental and organic pollutants. Curr Opin Plant Biol 3(2):153–162

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell D (2008) A note on rising food prices. Work bank policy research working paper no. 4682 http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1233058. Accessed April 2016

  • Molony T, Smith J (2010) Biofuels, food security, and Africa. Afr Aff 109(436):489–498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montefrio MJF, Sonnenfeld DA (2013) Global-local tensions in contract farming of biofuel crops involving indigenous communities in the Philippines. Soc Nat Resour 26:239–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oh K et al (2013) Development of profitable phytoremediation of contaminated soils with biofuel crops. J Environ Prot 4:58–64

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ottinger RL, Miller SE (2010) Bioenergy in developing countries. Renew Energy Law Policy Rev 2010(1):23–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Overmars KP et al (2011) Indirect land use change emission related to EU biofuel consumption: an analysis based on historical data. Environ Sci Pol 14(3):248–257

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rieger GE, Scott TE (1998) Emerging technical developments-phytoremediation. Environmental Claims Journal 10(2):171–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riser-Roberts E (1992) Bioremediation of petroleum contaminated sites. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Runge CF, Senauer B (2007) How biofuels could starve the poor. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/2007-05-01/how-biofuels-could-starve-poor. Accessed Apr 2016

  • Sachs I (1974) Environment and styles of development. Econ Polit Wkly 9(21):828–837

    Google Scholar 

  • Searchinger TRH (2008) Use of U.S. croplands for biofuel increases greenhouse gases through emissions from land-use change. Science 39(5867):1238–1240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shiva V, Bandyopadhya J (1983) Eucalyptus—a disastrous tree for India. Ecologist 13(5):184–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinha JBP (2014) Psycho-social analysis of the Indian mindset. Springer, New Delhi

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Smith GP II (1983) Acid rain: transnational perspective. NY School J Int Comp Law 4(3):459–502

    Google Scholar 

  • Speck AF (1970) Environment law: the price of pollution. UMKC Law Rev 39(2):200–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiegler L (2014) Avoiding the Catch-22: reforming the renewable fuel standard to protect freshwater resources and promote energy independence. Univ Richmond Law Rev 48(3):1063–1109

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuart M (2012) Saving our ecosystems: the threat of invasive exotic species and the need to act now. Environ Claim J 24(3):220–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tahvonen O (2000) Economic sustainability and scarcity of natural resources: a brief historical review. http://www.rff.org/files/sharepoint/WorkImages/Download/RFF-IB-00-tahvonen.pdf. Accessed April 2016

  • Tenebaum DJ (2008) Food vs. Fuel: diversion of crops could cause more hunger. Environ Health Perspect 116(6):A254–A257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tripathi V et al (2016) Towards coupling of phytoremediation with bioenergy production. Renew Sust Energ Rev 57:1386–1389

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Uhland AM (2008) Improving regulations for biomass-based electrical generating facilities. Nat Resour Environ 23(1):15–18

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCED (United Nations Conference on Environment and Development) (1992) Rio declaration on environment and development. WCED, Rio de Janerio

    Google Scholar 

  • Valin H et al (2015) The land use change impact of biofuels consumed in the EU: quantification of area and greenhouse gas impacts. https://ec.europa.eu/energy/sites/ener/files/documents/Final%20Report_GLOBIOM_publication.pdf. Accessed Apr 2016

  • Vanheusden B et al (2012) Legal and economic aspects of crops selection for phytoremediation purposes and the production of biofuel. http://projects.swedgeo.se/r2/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/REJUVENATE-2-Final-report-Legal-and-economic-aspects.pdf. Accessed Apr 2016

  • Verhulst PF (1838) A note on the law of population growth. In: Smith D, Keyfitz N (eds) Mathematical demography. Springer, New York, pp 333–339

    Google Scholar 

  • WECD (World Commission on Environment and Development) (1987) The Brundtland report: our common future. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong MH (2003) Ecological restoration of mine degradation soils, with emphasis on metal contaminated soils. Chemosphere 50(6):775–780

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rashwet Shrinkhal .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Shrinkhal, R. (2017). Coupling Phytoremediation Appositeness with Bioenergy Plants: A Sociolegal Perspective. In: Bauddh, K., Singh, B., Korstad, J. (eds) Phytoremediation Potential of Bioenergy Plants. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3084-0_19

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics