Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Inspiring Transformation Through TESTA’s Programme Approach

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Scaling up Assessment for Learning in Higher Education

Part of the book series: The Enabling Power of Assessment ((EPAS,volume 5))

Abstract

This chapter explores evidence from 75 undergraduate degree programmes at 14 UK universities about students’ experience of assessment and feedback. The data was collected through the Transforming the Experience of Students Through Assessment (TESTA) project. TESTA illuminates students’ whole programme experience of assessment and feedback within the context of modular curriculum design. The methodology consists of an audit to ascertain dimensions of the assessment environment and focus groups with students. Analysis explores the relationship between assessment design and students’ lived experience. Findings show the prevalence of high summative and low formative assessment diets and disconnected feedback which students find difficult to use. High summative diets reinforce students’ instrumental approach to learning. A lack of formative assessment impacts on engagement in learning, diminishing opportunities for risk-taking, creativity and wider reading. Findings from TESTA have prompted educationally principled strategies: rebalancing the number of summative and formative tasks with greater connections between them, devising formative assessment tasks valued by both students and staff and designing feedback to feedforward. Wider implications include establishing institutional mechanisms to ensure principled, evidence-based and programme-focused assessment and feedback design within existing curriculum processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ashford-Rowe, K., Herrington, J., & Brown, C. (2013). Establishing the critical elements that determine authentic assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(2), 205–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloxham, S., & Boyd, P. (2007). Planning a programme assessment strategy. In Developing effective assessment in higher education (pp. 157–175). Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boud, D. (2000). Sustainable assessment: Rethinking assessment for the learning society. Studies in Continuing Education, 22(2), 151–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boud, D., & Molloy, E. (Eds.). (2012). Feedback in higher and professional education: Understanding it and doing it well. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boud, D., & Molloy, E. (2013). Rethinking models of feedback for learning: The challenge of design. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(6), 698–712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bridges, D. (2000). Back to the future: The higher education curriculum in the 21st century. Cambridge Journal of Education, 30(1), 37–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carless, D. (2007). Learning-oriented assessment: Conceptual bases and practical implications. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 44(1), 57–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carless, D. (2015). Excellence in university assessment: Learning from award-winning practice. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, P. L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donald, J. G. (2009). The Commons: Disciplinary and interdisciplinary encounters. In C. Kreber (Ed.), The university and its disciplines: Teaching and learning within and beyond disciplinary boundaries (pp. 35–49). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, G., & Dunbar-Goddet, H. (2007). The effects of programme assessment environments on student learning. Higher Education Academy Report. Retrieved from https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/sites/default/files/gibbs_0506.pdf

  • Gibbs, G., & Dunbar-Goddet, H. (2009). Characterising programme-level assessment environments that support learning. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 34(4), 481–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harland, T., McLean, A., Wass, R., Miller, E., & Sim, K. N. (2014). An assessment arms race and its fallout: High-stakes grading and the case for slow scholarship. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 40(4), 528–541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE). (2015). 2015 – Higher education funding council for England. Retrieved from http://www.hefce.ac.uk/lt/nss/results/2015/

  • Hounsell, D., & Anderson, C. (2009). Ways of thinking and practising in biology and history: Disciplinary aspects of teaching and learning environments. In C. Kreber (Ed.), The university and its disciplines: Teaching and learning within and beyond disciplinary boundaries. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jessop, T. (2010a). Ten steps to auditing a programme. Retrieved from http://www.testa.ac.uk/index.php/resources/research-tool-kits/category/11-researchtoolkits

  • Jessop, T. (2010b). Focus group questions. Retrieved from http://www.testa.ac.uk/index.php/resources/research-tool-kits/category/11-researchtoolkits

  • Jessop, T. (2011). Coding focus group data. Retrieved from http://www.testa.ac.uk/index.php/resources/research-tool-kits/category/11-researchtoolkits

  • Jessop, T. (2013). TESTA case studies. Retrieved from http://www.testa.ac.uk/index.php/resources/case-studies/category/8-case-studies

  • Jessop, T. (2015, December). Flipping the technology-pedagogy equation: Principles to improve assessment and feedback. Seminar presentation at the University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jessop, T., El Hakim, Y., & Gibbs, G. (2011). TESTA: Research inspiring change. Educational Developments, 12(4), 12–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jessop, T., El Hakim, Y., & Gibbs, G. (2013). The whole is greater than the sum of its parts: A large-scale study of students’ learning in response to different programme assessment patterns. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(1), 73–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jessop, T., El Hakim, Y., & Gibbs, G. (2014). TESTA 2014: A way of thinking about assessment and feedback. Educational Developments, 15(2), 21–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jessop, T., & Maleckar, B. (2014). The influence of disciplinary assessment patterns on student learning: A comparative study. Studies in Higher Education, 41(4), 696–711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jessop, T., McNab, N., & Gubby, L. (2012). Mind the gap: An analysis of how quality assurance procedures influence programme assessment patterns. Active Learning in Higher Education, 13(3), 143–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, P. T. (2000). The value of a programme-wide approach to assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 25(3), 237–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, P. T. (2001). Complexity and curriculum: A process approach to curriculum-making. Teaching in Higher Education, 6(3), 369–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, P. T., & Yorke, M. (2003). Assessment learning and employability. Maidenhead, UK: Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lizzio, A., Wilson, K., & Simons, R. (2002). University students’ perceptions of the learning environment and academic outcomes: Implications for theory and practice. Studies in Higher Education, 27(1), 27–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mann, S. J. (2001). Alternative perspectives on the student experience: Alienation and engagement. Studies in Higher Education, 26(1), 7–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marton, F., & Saljo, R. (1976). On qualitative differences in learning: Outcome and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46(1), 4–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, C. M. L., & Parlett, M. R. (1974). Up to the mark: A study of the examination game. London: Society for Research into Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, D. L. (1997). Focus groups as qualitative research. London: Sage Publications.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Programme Assessment Strategies Project (PASS). (2009–2012). University of Bradford. Retrieved from http://pass.brad.ac.uk

  • Richardson, L. W. (1990). Writing strategies: Reaching diverse audiences. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rust, C. (2000). A possible student-centred assessment solution to some of the current problems of modular degree programmes. Active Learning in Higher Education, 1, 126–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18(2), 119–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, L. A. (2005, October). Formative assessment: Caveat emptor. Paper presented at ‘The Future of Assessment: Shaping Teaching and Learning’ Conference, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. S. (2005). Signature pedagogies in the professions. Daedalus, 134(3), 52–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stenhouse, L. (1975). An introduction to curriculum research and development. London: Heinemann Educational Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taras, M. (2008). Summative and formative assessment: Perceptions and realities. Active Learning in Higher Education, 9(2), 172–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Transforming the Experience of Students through Assessment (TESTA). (2015). The University of Winchester. Retrieved from http://www.testa.ac.uk

  • Torrance, H. (2007). Assessment as learning? How the use of explicit learning objectives, assessment criteria and feedback in post-secondary education and training can come to dominate learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 14(3), 281–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torrance, H. (2012). Formative assessment at the crossroads: Conformative, deformative and transformative assessment. Oxford Review of Education, 38(3), 323–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yorke, M. (2003). Formative assessment in higher education: Moves towards theory and the enhancement of pedagogic practice. Higher Education, 45, 477–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Southampton Solent University, Southampton, UK

    Tansy Jessop

Authors
  1. Tansy Jessop
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tansy Jessop .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Education, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong

    David Carless

  2. Faculty of Education, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong

    Susan M. Bridges

  3. Ctr. Enhancement of Teaching & Learning, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong

    Cecilia Ka Yuk Chan

  4. Faculty of Law, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong

    Rick Glofcheski

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jessop, T. (2017). Inspiring Transformation Through TESTA’s Programme Approach. In: Carless, D., Bridges, S., Chan, C., Glofcheski, R. (eds) Scaling up Assessment for Learning in Higher Education. The Enabling Power of Assessment, vol 5. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3045-1_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3045-1_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-3043-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-3045-1

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation