Advertisement

Democratic Innovations, Globalisation and Identity Formation

  • Kalpana JhaEmail author
Chapter
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Anthropology book series (BRIEFSANTHRO)

Abstract

The new democracies of South Asia, like Nepal, overwhelmed by the idea of advanced democracies of the West, fail to design a democratic model best suited to its sociopolitical structure. Additionally, defining democracy in a relatively divided society has been a challenging task for any emerging democracy especially in terms of accommodating these diversities. In the process of defining democracy which holds the diversity together, the state automatically becomes hegemonic However, at the same time, this model provides a space for these diversities to retaliate with the state. This chapter elaborates on the process of democratisation vis-à-vis globalisation of Nepal and its relation to the ethnic turmoil in Madhes.

Keywords

Nation states Globalisation Democracy Foreign aid Non-Government Organisation Land reform 

References

  1. Baylis, J., Owens, P., & Smith, S. (2008). The globalization of world politics: An introduction to international relations. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Baqai, H. (2005). Democratic deficit in South Asia. Pakistan Horizon, 43–52.Google Scholar
  3. Bauman, Z. (1998). Globalization: The human consequences. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  4. Birch, A. H. (1993). The concepts and theories of modern democracy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Brubaker, R., & Laitin, D. D. (1998). Ethnic and nationalist violence. Annual Review of Sociology, 423–452.Google Scholar
  6. Castells, M. (2010). The power of identity. West Sussex: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
  7. Chaterjee, P. (1986). Natioanlist world and the colonial thought: A derivative discourse. Tokyo: Zed Books Ltd.Google Scholar
  8. Cox, T. (1990). Land rights and ethnic conflict in Nepal. Economic Political Weekly, 1318–1320.Google Scholar
  9. Easterly, W. (2010). Can foreign aid buy growth? Retrieved June 13, 2014, from http://williameasterly.files.wordpress.com/2010/08/40_easterly_canforeignaidbuygrowth_prp.pdf.
  10. Gaige, F. H. (2009). Regionalism and national unity in Nepal. Kathmandu: Social Science Baha.Google Scholar
  11. Gupta, A. (2000). Bulding democracies in South Asia. Economic and Political Weekly, 1071–1074.Google Scholar
  12. Hirsch, J. (1995). Nation-state, international regulation and the question of democracy. Review of International Political Economy, 267–284. Google Scholar
  13. Huntington, S. P. (1996). Clash of civilizations and the remaking of the world order. London: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  14. Kothari, R. (1988). State against democracy: In search of humane governance. Delhi: Ajanta Publications.Google Scholar
  15. Kothari, R. (2007). Rethinking democracy. New Delhi: Orient Longman Pvt. Ltd.Google Scholar
  16. Ladejinsky, W. (1964). Agrarian reform in Asia. Council on Foreign Relaltions, 445–460.Google Scholar
  17. Mage, J. (2007). The Nepali Revolution and International Relations. Economic and Political Weekly, 1834–1839.Google Scholar
  18. Manchanda, E. R. (2010). States in conflict with their minorities. New Delhi: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  19. Marie, S. N. (2008). Globalization discontent: The effects of globalization on ethnic protests. Peace Economics: Peace Science and Public Policy.Google Scholar
  20. Niezen, R. (2003). The origin of indigenism: Human-rights and the politics of identity. London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  21. Olzak, S. (2010). Does globalization breed ethnic discontent. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 3–32.Google Scholar
  22. Phandis, U., & Ganguly, R. (2001). Ethnicity and nation building in South Asia. New Delhi: Sage Publications Pvt. Ltd.Google Scholar
  23. Shani, G. (2012). Identity-politics in the global age. In A. Elliot (Ed.), Hand book of identity studies (pp. 380–396). Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Tambiah, S. J. (1989). Ethnic conflict in the world today (pp. 335–349). American Anthropological Association.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Tata Institute of Social SciencesMumbaiIndia

Personalised recommendations