Evolutionary Game and Simulation on the Internet of Things in Supply Chain

Conference paper
Part of the Uncertainty and Operations Research book series (UOR)

Abstract

The enterprise guide IOT innovation is the important path for the enterprise innovation and development mode change. First of all, based on the use of the Internet of things in the supply chain innovation stage, the synergy degree and degree of freedom in the process of the three dimensions, establish IOT game payoff matrix and the implementation strategy proportion of replicated dynamic equation. Then we simulate IOT customer participation in innovative ways. Research has shown that IOT innovative customers recently, with the enterprise’s desire to maintain collaborative innovation relations becoming more intense; Companies to provide a free and high degree of open innovation platform, the customer may appear rejection; Customers are choosing IOT innovation low degree of freedom of the participation way, but eventually tend to choose high degree of freedom of the participation way; The more platform for customers, the customers involved in earlier Internet innovation platform.

Keywords

The internet of things Game theory Simulation Innovation 

References

  1. 1.
    Ritter T, Gemunden HG (2003) Inter-organizational relationships and networks: an overview. J Bus Res 56:691–697CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Love JH, Roper S (2001) Location and network effects on innovation success: evidence for UK, German and Zrish manufacturing plant. Res Policy 30:643–661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Nooteboom B (1999) Innovation and inter-firm linkages: new implications for policy. Res Policy 28:793–805CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Diez JR (2000) Innovative networks in manufacturing: some empirical evidence from the metropolitan area of Barcelona. Technovation 20:139–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    van den Daele W, Kope W (1998) Experimental implementation as a linking mechanism in the process of innovation. Res Policy 27:853–863CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gulati R (1995) Social structure and alliance formation pattern: a longitudinal analysis. Adm Sci Q 40(4):619–652CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Doz YL, Paul M, Ring PS (2000) Formation processes of R&D consortia: which path to take? Where does it lead? Strateg Manag J 21:239–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zander (2002) The formation of international innovation networks in the multinational corporation: an evolutionary perspective. J Ind Corp Change 11(2):327–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Deroian F (2002) Formation of social networks and diffusion of innovations. Res Policy 31:835–846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Leung J, Cheung W (2014) Aligning RFID applications with supply chain strategies. Inf Manag (2):260–269Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bardaki C, Kourouthanassis P, Pramatari K (2012) Deploying RFID-enabled services in the retail supply chain: lessons learned toward the internet of things. Inf Syst Manag 29(3):233–245Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Verdouw CN, Beulens AJM, van der Vorst JGAJ (2013) Virtualisation of floricultural supply chains: a review from an internet of things perspective original research article. Comput Electron Agric 99:160–175Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Guangzhou Vocational College of Science and TechnologyGuangzhouChina
  2. 2.Department of Computer and Information SciencesSouthwest UniversityChongqingChina

Personalised recommendations