Abstract
Scholars generally characterize activist organizations as pursuing either “reformist” or “radical” agendas and using either collaborative or confrontational strategies to engage with firms. This paradigm oversimplifies the behavior of these organizations and ignores the possibility that they may pursue hybrid approaches that combine a range of strategies. This chapter explores how the non profit WWF used such an approach to engage the luxury industry in its 2007 Deeper Luxury report. The chapter analyzes the report’s descriptive and injunctive normative statements that positively engage the industry and its controversial rating system that directly confronts the top ten luxury firms. The chapter also examines the sustainability-related documents of the ten rated companies, and finds that their responses to WWF’s normative demands varied significantly, with L’Oreal, LVMH, and PPR demonstrating the greatest responsiveness. It concludes that this hybrid approach had mixed results in promoting sustainable management within the luxury industry, and may require collaboration among organizations with different skills and reputations.
Keywords
- Luxury
- Sustainability
- Industry norms
- Nongovernmental organizations (NGOs)
- Environmental assessment
- Corporate social responsibility (CSR)
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buying options
References
Austin JE, Seitanidi MM (2012) Collaborative value creation: a review of partnering between nonprofits and businesses. Part 2: Partnership processes and outcomes. Nonprofit Volunt Sector Q 41:929–968. doi:10.1177/0899764012454685
Banks M (2010) World wildlife fund. Good cop/bad cop: environmental NGOs and their strategies toward business. Resources for the Future Press, Washington, D.C., pp 171–183
Belli B (2008) Green living deluxe: how the environmental movement went way, way upscale. E 19
Bendell J (2011) Evolving Partnerships: a guide to working with business for greater social change. Greenleaf Publishing
Bendell J, Kleanthous A (2007) Deeper luxury: quality and style when the world matters. World Wildlife Fund (UK)
Ber MJL, Branzei O (2010) (Re)forming strategic cross-sector partnerships relational processes of social innovation. Bus Soc 49:140–172. doi:10.1177/0007650309345457
Boenigk S, Schuchardt V (2014) Nonprofit collaboration with luxury brands: positive and negative effects for cause-related marketing. Nonprofit Volunt Sector Q. doi:10.1177/0899764014551280
Bosso CJ (1995) The color of money: environmental groups and the pathologies of fund raising. In: Interest group politics, 4th edn. CQ Press, Washington, D.C., pp 101–130
Brown LD (2008) Creating credibility: legitimacy and accountability for transnational civil society. Kumarian Press
Bullock G (2015a) Independent labels? The power behind environmental information about products and companies. Polit Res Q 68:46–62. doi:10.1177/1065912914564685
Bullock G (2011) Green grades: the popularity and perceived effectiveness of information-based environmental governance strategies. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley
Bullock G (2015b) Signaling the credibility of private actors as public agents: transparency, independence, and expertise in environmental evaluations of products and companies. Bus Polit 17:177–219
Caniato F, Caridi M, Castelli C, Golini R (2011) Supply chain management in the luxury industry: a first classification of companies and their strategies. Int J Prod Econ 133:622–633
Chapple W, Moon J (2005) Corporate social responsibility (CSR) in Asia a seven-country study of CSR web site reporting. Bus Soc 44:415–441. doi:10.1177/0007650305281658
Cheuvreux (2012) Luxury goods—sustainability sector profile. Cheuvreux Credit Agricole Group
Cornforth C, Hayes JP, Vangen S (2014) Nonprofit-public collaborations: understanding governance dynamics. Nonprofit Volunt Sector Q. doi:10.1177/0899764014532836
Covalence SA (2013a) About. In: ethicalquote.com. http://www.ethicalquote.com/index.php/about-us/. Accessed 26 Feb 2013
Covalence SA (2013b) Clients. In: ethicalquote.com. http://www.ethicalquote.com/index.php/clients/. Accessed 26 Feb 2013
Covalence SA (2012) Methodology. In: ethicalquote.com. http://www.ethicalquote.com/docs/CovalenceEthicalQuoteMethodology.pdf. Accessed 26 Feb 2013
EIRIS (2013a) About us. In: eiris.org. http://www.eiris.org/about_us.html. Accessed 26 Feb 2013
EIRIS Our Clients (2013b) In: eiris.org. http://www.eiris.org/managers/our_clients.html. Accessed 26 Feb 2013
EIRIS (2008a) EIRIS independence policy. In: eiris.org. http://www.eiris.org/about-us/documents/independencepolicy-summary.pdf. Accessed 26 Feb 2013
EIRIS (2008b) EIRIS code of conduct. In: eiris.org. http://www.eiris.org/about-us/documents/codeofconductpolicy.pdf. Accessed 26 Feb 2013
Elkington J, Beloe S (2010) The twenty-first century NGO. Good cop bad cop: environmental NGOs and their strategies toward business. Resources for the Future Press, Washington, D.C., pp 17–47
Fifka MS, Drabble M (2012) Focus and standardization of sustainability reporting—a comparative study of the United Kingdom and Finland. Bus Strategy Environ 21:455–474. doi:10.1002/bse.1730
Frooman J (1999) Stakeholder influence strategies. Acad Manag Rev 24:191–205. doi:10.2307/259074
Google (2013) Google trends. In: google.com/trends. http://www.google.com/trends/explore. Accessed 4 Mar 2013
Gormley WT, Weimer DL (1999) Organizational report cards. Harvard University Press
Heine K (2010) Luxury & sustainability: implications of a consumer-oriented concept of luxury brands (abstract). Istanbul
Hendry JR (2006) Taking aim at business what factors lead environmental non-governmental organizations to target particular firms? Bus Soc 45:47–86. doi:10.1177/0007650305281849
Hoffman A, Bertels S (2010) Who is part of the environmental movement? Good cop/bad cop: Environmental NGOs and their strategies toward business. Resources for the Future Press, Washington, D.C., pp 48–72
Hond FD, Bakker FGAD (2007) Ideologically motivated activism: how activist groups influence corporate social change activities. Acad Manag Rev 32:901–924. doi:10.2307/20159341
Interis M (2011) On norms: a typology with discussion. Am J Econ Sociol 70:424–438
Jasso G, Opp K-D (1997) Probing the character of norms: a factorial survey analysis of the norms of political action. Am Sociol Rev 62:947–964. doi:10.2307/2657349
Kahn J (2009) Luxury-goods makers embrace sustainability. The New York Times
Kapferer J-N (2010) All that glitters is not green: the challenge of sustainable luxury. Eur Bus Rev
Klein N (1999) No logo: taking aim at the brand bullies. Picador, New York
Kourula A, Laasonen S (2010) Nongovernmental organizations in business and society, management, and international business research review and implications from 1998 to 2007. Bus Soc 49:35–67. doi:10.1177/0007650309345282
Krill J (2010) Rainforest Action Network. Good cop/bad cop: environmental NGOs and their strategies toward business. Resources for the Future Press, Washington, D.C., pp 208–220
Liston-Heyes C, Liu G (2010) Cause-related marketing in the retail and finance sectors an exploratory study of the determinants of cause selection and nonprofit alliances. Nonprofit Volunt Sector Q 39:77–101. doi:10.1177/0899764008326680
Lyon TP (2010) Good cop/bad cop: environmental NGOs and their strategies toward business. Resources for the Future, Washington, D.C.
MacIndoe H, Barman E (2013) How organizational stakeholders shape performance measurement in nonprofits exploring a multidimensional measure. Nonprofit Volunt Sector Q 42:716–738. doi:10.1177/0899764012444351
Miller J (2007) CRJP asks WWF-UK to withdraw “deeper luxury” report. In: diamonds.net. http://www.diamonds.net/News/NewsItem.aspx?ArticleID=19927&ArticleTitle=CRJP+Asks+WWF-UK+to+Withdraw+%27Deeper+Luxury%27+Report. Accessed 10 Feb 2013
Moore MH (2000) Managing for value: organizational strategy in for-profit, nonprofit, and governmental organizations. Nonprofit Volunt Sector Q 29:183–208. doi:10.1177/089976400773746391
Parker AR (2003) Prospects for NGO collaboration with multinational enterprises. Globalization and NGOs: transforming business, government, and society. Greenwood Publishing Group, Santa Barbara, pp 81–105
Perego P, Kolk A (2012) Multinationals’ accountability on sustainability: the evolution of third-party assurance of sustainability reports. J Bus Ethics 110:173–190. doi:http://dx.doi.org.ezproxy.lib.davidson.edu/10.1007/s10551-012-1420-5
Pinkse J, Kolk A (2012) Addressing the climate change—sustainable development Nexus: the role of multistakeholder partnerships. Bus Soc 51:176–210. doi:10.1177/0007650311427426
Qureshi A (2012) On the green carpet. Financ Times
Rodriguez Bolivar MP (2009) Evaluating corporate environmental reporting on the internet: the utility and resource industries in Spain. Bus Soc 48:179–205. doi:10.1177/0007650307305370
Ruta G (2010) Environmental defense fund. Good cop/bad cop: environmental NGOs and their strategies toward business. Resources for the Future Press, Washington, D.C., pp 184–194
Schiller RS, Almog-Bar M (2013) Revisiting collaborations between nonprofits and businesses: an NPO-centric view and typology. Nonprofit Volunt Sector Q 42:942–962. doi:10.1177/0899764012471753
Sowa JE (2004) No longer unmeasurable? a multidimensional integrated model of nonprofit organizational effectiveness. Nonprofit Volunt Sector Q 33:711–728. doi:10.1177/0899764004269146
Sunstein CR (1996) Social norms and social roles. Columbia Law Rev 96:903–968. doi:10.2307/1123430
Tungate M (2009) Luxury world: the past, present and future of luxury brands. Kogan Page Limited, London and Philadelphia
Uren S (2012) Can luxury be sustainable? Green Futures, 37–37
van Huijstee M, Glasbergen P (2010) NGOs moving business: an analysis of contrasting strategies. Bus Soc 49:591–618. doi:10.1177/0007650310365516
Vogel D (2008) Private global business regulation. Annu Rev Polit Sci 11:261–282. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.053106.141706
Weber J, Marley KA (2012) In search of stakeholder salience: exploring corporate social and sustainability reports. Bus Soc 51:626–649. doi:10.1177/0007650309353061
Wilson KL, Lizzio AJ, Zauner S, Gallois C (2001) Social rules for managing attempted interpersonal domination in the workplace: influence of status and gender. Sex Roles 44:129–154. doi:10.1023/A:1010998802612
Acknowledgements
I would like to acknowledge the assistance of Emma Park in conducting the research for this chapter. As an undergraduate at Davidson College, Emma helped collect and analyze the corporate social responsibility reports and related documents discussed in the chapter. She was also very helpful in thinking about WWF’s strategy and the industry’s response to its Deeper Luxury report.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bullock, G. (2017). Promoting Sustainable Management: World Wildlife Fund’s Hybrid Strategy to Change the Luxury Industry. In: Gardetti, M. (eds) Sustainable Management of Luxury. Environmental Footprints and Eco-design of Products and Processes. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2917-2_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2917-2_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-2916-5
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-2917-2
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)