Advertisement

Choosing Change: Using a Community of Practice Model to Support Curriculum Reform and Improve Teaching Quality in the First Year

  • Mary HeathEmail author
  • Tania Leiman
Chapter
  • 837 Downloads

Abstract

Significant, competing pressures for change have become constants in tertiary teaching. Many academics choose to change teaching and course design to better reflect pedagogical research and support learning. Some changes, however, are imposed by institutional policies responding to the wider higher education context. Whether change is chosen or imposed, managing it is made more difficult by increasing workloads and decreasing opportunities for collaborative decision-making and professional skills development. This chapter describes our experience of facilitating a community of practice with teachers of first year law students as a change management strategy. We established the community of practice with twin hopes. Firstly, we sought to support a research-based first year pedagogy, centred in an integrated approach to curriculum and student support. Secondly, we needed a pragmatic intervention to support implementation of a new curriculum and major changes in university policy with a new cohort of first year staff. A community of practice offered a promising model for achieving pedagogical goals through addressing teachers’ needs, rather than simply escalating demands on staff. We chose a community of practice approach believing it would allow teachers to strengthen collaborations, build skills and share best practices, all of which we believed were essential to creating an integrated first year experience that could result only from a team of first year teachers. This chapter discusses the initiation, development and achievements of our community of practice before turning to considerations of life cycle, leadership, resources and long term sustainability.

Keywords

Community of practice First year experience Legal education University teaching Change management 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge the inspiration of Cassandra Star and Jacquelin McDonald; David Bamford who as the Dean who enthusiastically supported the creation of the CoP; the Faculty of Education, Humanities and Law, who supported the CoP through a Teaching and Learning Innovation grant; the Flinders CoP programme which has since provided support to several CoPs at Flinders (including ours); the anonymous referees; and especially, the first year staff who have participated in the CoP and made it a force for creativity and mutual support. Finally, we want to thank the students whose perspectives have driven the work of the CoP and those who have welcomed innovations that have arisen from our collaborative work in the CoP. We also thank Claire Nettle for her fine editing. Needless to say, any flaws this paper contains are all our own work.

References

  1. Amin, A., & Roberts, J. (2008). Knowing in action: Beyond communities of practice. Research Policy, 37, 353–369. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2007.11.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bathmaker, A., & Avis, J. (2005). Becoming a lecturer in further education in England: The construction of professional identity and the role of communities of practice. Journal of Education for Teaching: International Research and Pedagogy, 31(1), 47–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Borzillo, S., Aznar, S., & Shmitt, A. (2011). A journey through communities of practice: How and why members move from the periphery to the core. European Management Journal, 29, 25–42. doi: 10.1016/j.emj.2010.08.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boud, D., & Falchikov, N. (2006). Aligning assessment with long-term learning. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(4), 399–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bradley, D., Noonan, P., Nugent, H. & Scales, B. (2008). Review of Australian Higher Education: Final Report. Canberra: Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations. http://gellen.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/Higher_Educatio_Review.pdf
  6. Clark, J., Stoodley, I. & Nelson, K. (2013). Using a maturity model to move student engagement practices beyond the generational approach. In 16th International First Year in Higher Education Conference 2013 Wellington New Zealand. http://fyhe.com.au/past_papers/papers13/4A.pdf. Accessed 23 February 2015.
  7. Coates, H., Dobson, I., Goedegebuure, L., & Meek, L. (2009). Australia’s casual approach to its academic teaching workforce. People and Place, 17(4), 47–54.Google Scholar
  8. Coates, H., Dobson, I., Goedegebuure, L., & Meek, L. (2010). Across the great divide: What do Australian academics think of university leadership? Advice from the CAP survey. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 32(4), 379–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Field, R., & Kift, S. (2010). Addressing the high levels of psychological distress in law students through intentional assessment and feedback design in the first year curriculum. International Journal of the First Year in Higher Education, 1(1), 65–76. doi: 10.5204/intjfyhe.v1i1.20 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Garavan, T., & Carbery, R. (2007). Managing intentionally created communities of practice for knowledge sourcing across organisational boundaries. The Learning Organisation, 14(1), 34–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gongla, P., & Rizzuto, C. R. (2001). Evolving communities of practice: IBM global services experience. IBM Systems Journal, 40(4), 842–862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. James, N. (2013). ‘How dare you tell me how to teach!’: Resistance to educationalism within Australian law schools. UNSW Law Journal, 36(3), 779–808.Google Scholar
  13. Kelk, N., Luscombe, G., Medlow, S. & Hickie, I. (2009). Courting the blues: Attitudes towards depression in Australian law students and lawyers. In BMRI Monograph 2009-1. Sydney: Brain & Mind Research Institute.Google Scholar
  14. Kift, S. (2008a). 21st century climate for change: Curriculum design for quality learning engagement in law. Legal Education Review, 18, 1–30.Google Scholar
  15. Kift, S. (2008b). The next, great first year challenge: Sustaining, co-ordinating and embedding coherent institution-wide approaches to enact the FYE as “everybody’s business.” First Year in Higher Education.Google Scholar
  16. Kift, S. (2009). Articulating a transition pedagogy to scaffold and to enhance the first year student learning experience in Australian higher education. Canberra: Australian Learning and Teaching Council.Google Scholar
  17. Kift, S. (2012). Guiding good practice for virtuous compliance. In Campus Review.Google Scholar
  18. Kift, S., Nelson, K., & Clarke, J. (2010). Transition pedagogy: A third generation approach to FYE—A case study of policy and practice for the higher education sector. The International Journal of the First Year in Higher Education, 1(1), 1–20. doi: 10.5204/intjfyhe.v1i1.13 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lizzio, A. (2006). Designing an orientation and transition strategy for commencing students: A conceptual summary of research and practice. Retrieved from http://www.griffith.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0008/51875/Alfs-5-Senors-Paper-FYE-Project,-2006.pdf
  20. McDonald, J., Collins, P., Hingst, R. D., Kimmins, L., Lynch, B., & Star, C. (2008). Community learning: Member’s stories about their academic community of practice. In 31st HERDSA Annual Conference: Engaging Communities (HERDSA 2008), Rotorua, New Zealand, 1–4 July 2008.Google Scholar
  21. McDonald, J. & Star, C. (2006). Designing the future of learning through a community of practice of teachers of first year courses at an Australian University. The First International LAMS Conference: Designing the Future of Learning.Google Scholar
  22. Nagy, J., & Burch, T. (2009). Communities of practice in academe: Understanding academic work practices to enable knowledge building capacities in corporate universities. Oxford Review of Education, 35(2), 227–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Palmer, P. J. (2007). The courage to teach. San Francisco: Wiley.Google Scholar
  24. Penn-Edwards, S., & Donnison, S. (2014). A fourth generation approach to transition in the first year in higher education: First year in higher education community of practice (FYHECoP). The International Journal of the First Year in Higher Education, 5(1), 31–41. doi: 10.5204/intjfyhe.v5i1.190 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ray, D. (2006). The life cycles of communities of practice. In E. Coakes & S. Clarke (Eds.), Encyclopedia of communities of practice in information and knowledge management (pp. 323–326). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ryan, S., Guthrie, J., & Neumann, R. (2008). Australian higher education transformed: from central coordination to control. In C. Mazza, P. Quattrone, & A. Riccaboni (Eds.), European universities in transition: Issues, models and cases (pp. 171–187). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
  27. Star, C., Heath, M. A., Anderson, K. E., Hayes, A. C., Reynolds, L. C., & Stephenson, H. R. (2013). Good CoP or Bad CoP? What makes a community of practice successful; Learning from experience at Flinders University. ergo: The Journal of the Education Research Group of Adelaide, 3(1), 23–28.Google Scholar
  28. Tani, M., & Vines, P. (2009). Law students’ attitudes to education: Pointers to depression in the legal academy and the profession? Legal Education Review, 19(1), 3–40.Google Scholar
  29. Thornton, M. (2012). Privatising the public university: The case of law. Oxford: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. Viskovic, A., & Robson, J. (2001). Community and identity: Experiences and dilemmas of vocational teachers in post-school contexts. Journal of In-Service Education, 27(2), 221–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wenger, E. C. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wenger, E., McDermott, R., & Snyder, W. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge. Boston: Harvard Business Press.Google Scholar
  33. Wenger, E. C., & Snyder, W. M. (2000). Communities of practice: The organizational frontier. Harvard Business Review, 78, 139–145.Google Scholar
  34. Wilson, K. (2009). The impact of institutional, programmatic and personal interventions on an effective and sustainable first year student experience. In 12th First Year in Higher Education Conference 2009, Townsville.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Flinders University School of LawAdelaideAustralia

Personalised recommendations