Advertisement

Fostering Deep Learning and Critical Thinking Amongst Net Generation Learners

  • Matthew Watkins
Chapter
Part of the Contemporary Issues in Technology Education book series (CITE)

Abstract

This chapter explores how to encourage Net Generation learners to develop deep learning through the use of carefully designed interactive audio-visual workshops. Careful design of teaching resources can increase relevance, encourage discussion and debate and provide opportunities for critical reflection amongst students, a noted weakness of Net Generation learners.

Keywords

Critical Thinking Deep Learning Critical Reflection Independent Learning Reflective Journal 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

References

  1. Ahlkvist, J. A. (2001). Sound and vision: Using progressive rock to teach social theory. Teaching Sociology, 29(4), 471–482.Google Scholar
  2. Albers, B. D., & Bach, R. (2003). Rockin’ soc: Using popular music to introduce sociological concepts. Teaching Sociology, 31(2), 237–245.Google Scholar
  3. Barnes, K., Marateo, R., & Ferris, S. (2007). Teaching and learning with the net generation. Innovate, 3(4).Google Scholar
  4. Cohen, S. B. (2014). Songs for justice. Retrieved August 18, 2011, from http://www.jamforjustice.org/the-experience/songs-for-justice/
  5. DATA. (2014). Design and technology programmes of study: Key stages 1 to 3 national curriculum in England key. Wellesbourne, Warwickshire. Retrieved May 30, 2015, from https://www.data.org.uk/for-education/curriculum/dt-national-curriculum-for-england-2014/
  6. Elkington, J. (1998). Cannibals with forks: the triple bottom line of 21st century business. Gabriola Island: New Society Publishers.Google Scholar
  7. Entwistle, N. J. (2000). Promoting deep learning through teaching and assessment: Conceptual frameworks and educational contexts. In TLRP conference. Leicester. Retrieved from https://www.data.org.uk/for-education/curriculum/dt-national-curriculum-for-england-2014/
  8. Fransson, A. (1977). On qualitative differences in learning: IV – Effects of intrinsic motivation and extrinsic test anxiety on process and outcome. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 47, 244–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Glegg, G. L. (1969). The design of design. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Gokhale, A. A. (1995). Collaborative learning enhances critical thinking. Journal of Technology Education, 7(1), 22–30.Google Scholar
  11. Gorski, P. C. (2014). Social justice song index. Retrieved May 30, 2015, from http://www.edchange.org/multicultural/arts/songs.html
  12. Griffith J. S., & Bamford, R. (2007). Embedding the principles of responsible design into student practice from 1st year. In: Proceedings of connected 2007 international conference on design education. University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.Google Scholar
  13. Holliday, W., & Li, Q. (2004). Understanding the millennials: Updating our knowledge about students. Reference Services Review, 32(4), 356–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hounsell, D. (1997). Understanding and teaching for understanding. In N. Marton, F. Hounsell, & D. Entwistle (Eds.), The experience of learning: Implications for teaching and studying in higher education (pp. 238–257). Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.Google Scholar
  15. Howe, N., & Strauss, W. (2003). Millenials go to college: Strategies for a new generation on campus: Recruiting and admissions, campus life, and the classroom (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: American Association of Collegiate Registrars and Admissions Officers.Google Scholar
  16. Hraba, J., Powers, E., Woodman, W., & Miller, M. (1980). Social change through photographs and music: A qualitative method for teaching. Qualitative Sociology, 3(2), 123–135.Google Scholar
  17. Huckle, J., & Sterling, S. (1997). Education for sustainability. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  18. ITEA. (2007). Standards for technological literacy: Content for the study of technology. Reston: International Technology Education Association. Retrieved May 30, 2015, from http://www.iteea.org/TAA/Publications/TAA_Publications.html
  19. Lawson, B. (2006). How designers think: The design process demystified (4th ed.). Oxford: Architectural Press.Google Scholar
  20. Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1997). Approaches to learning. In F. Marton, D. Hounsell, & N. J. Entwistle (Eds.), The experience of learning: Implications for teaching and studying in higher education (pp. 39–58). Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.Google Scholar
  21. McMahon, T. (2006). Teaching for more effective learning: Seven maxims for practice. Radiography, 12(1), 34–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. McNerney, C., & Davis, N. D. (1996). Education for sustainability: An agenda for action. Pennsylvania: Diane Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  23. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  24. Ministry of Education. (2007). The New Zealand curriculum. Wellington: Ministry of Education.Google Scholar
  25. Murray, P. (2011). The sustainable self: A personal approach to sustainability education. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  26. Oblinger, D., & Oblinger, J. (2005a). Educating the net generation. Retrieved August 18, 2011, from http://www.educause.edu/educatingthenetgen
  27. Oblinger, D., & Oblinger, J. (2005b). Educating the net generation – Is it age or IT: First steps toward understanding the net generation. Retrieved August 18, 2011, from http://www.educause.edu/educatingthenetgen
  28. Palfrey, J., & Gasser, U. (2008). Born digital: Understanding the first generation of digital natives. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  29. Panos Pictures. (2012). No Title. Retrieved September 20, 2012, from http://www.panos.co.uk/
  30. Peterson, B. (2002). Songs with a global conscience. Retrieved May 30, 2015, from http://www.rethinkingschools.org/publication/rg/RGResource01.shtml
  31. Ramsden, P. (1997). The context of learning in academic departments. In N. Marton, F. Hounsell, & D. Entwistle (Eds.), The experience of learning: Implications for teaching and studying in higher education (pp. 198–216). Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.Google Scholar
  32. Seidel, V. P., & Fixson, S. K. (2013). Adopting “design thinking” in novice multidisciplinary teams: The application and linits of design methods and reflexive practices. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 30(S1), 19–33.Google Scholar
  33. So Just. (2012). Social justice songs. Retrieved May 30, 2015, from http://www.sojust.net/songs.html
  34. Tan, E., & Pearce, N. (2011). Open education videos in the classroom:exploring the opportunities and barriers to the use of youTube in teaching introductory sociology. Research in Learning Technology, 19(1), 125–133.Google Scholar
  35. Tapscott, D. (2009). Grown up digital: How the net generation is changing your world (1st ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  36. Vaughan, N. (2006). The use of wikis and weblogs to support deep Approaches to learning (Vol. 1). Calgary: Teaching and Learning Centre, University of Calgary. Retrieved from http://journals.ufv.ca/rr/RR13/article-PDFs/6-vaughan.pdf
  37. Warburton, K. (2003). Deep learning and education for sustainability. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 4(1), 44–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Watkins, M. A. (2014a). Exploitation – Rethinking design series. Retrieved May 30, 2015, from http://youtu.be/D7LRY7bEbyw
  39. Watkins, M. A. (2014b). Localisation, emotionally durable design and reuse – Rethinking design series. Retrieved May 30, 2015, from http://youtu.be/9RKSl6-Ewcc
  40. Watkins, M. A. (2014c). Step into my world – Rethinking design series. Retrieved May 30, 2015, from http://youtu.be/FtAZv1l7_80
  41. Whitfield, P. R. (1975). Creativity in industry. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  42. Windham, C. (2005). Educating the net generation – The student’s perspective. Retrieved August 18, 2011, from http://www.educause.edu/educatingthenetgen

Bibliography

  1. Edwards, M. (2009). Hard rain. Retrieved August 24, 2011, from http://www.hardrainproject.com/
  2. Watkins, M. (2014a). Towards an understanding of the social aspects of sustainability in product design: Teaching HE students in the UK and Ireland through reflection and peer learning. The Journal of Design and Technology Education, 19(1), 40–47.Google Scholar
  3. Watkins, M. A. (2014b). An investigation into effective methods for teaching social sustainability within product design in British and Irish Universities. Thesis (PhD Doctorate), Loughborough University, UK.Google Scholar
  4. Watkins, M. A. (2014c). Teaching the YouTube generation: Exploring the benefits of an interactive teaching approach in sustainable product design. In E. B. Sarrias, & L. M. S. Ruiz (Eds.), Global Valencia (pp. 501–506). Valencia: Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería del Diseño Universidad Politécnica de ValenciaGoogle Scholar
  5. Watkins, M. A. (2015). An audio visual approach to the teaching of the social aspects of sustainable product design. Formakademisk, 8(1).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Architecture, Design and the Built EnvironmentNottingham Trent UniversityNottinghamUK

Personalised recommendations