Abstract
This introductory chapter positions the discussion on SDGs within the broader context of development and communication perspectives. After defining ‘sustainable development’, this chapter first distinguishes between three general development paradigms (modernization, dependency, and multiplicity), and two communication paradigms (diffusion versus participatory communication). Secondly, it identifies the specific communication for social change approaches and strategies which lead towards sustainability. It then evaluates the achievements of the MDGs, and the transition from MDGs to SDGs. While introducing the other contributions, this chapter presents a strong argument for the inclusion of culture and communication in the debate on SDGs.
Keywords
The SDGs represent the change we need to restore people’s trust in the global economy. The SDGs represent an enormous opportunity to make our economy work for dignity for all, prosperity for all and a better planet for all. … The SDGs aim to end poverty in all its forms everywhere, ensuring people live in dignity and prosperity while protecting the planet.
(Ban Ki Moon, 17 July 2016).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Agyeman, J. (2013). Introducing just sustainabilities. Policy, planning and practice. London: ZED Books.
Avery, G., & Bergsteiner, H. (Eds.). (2016). Sufficiency thinking. Thailand’s gift to an unsustainable world. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
Alston, P. (2005). Ships passing in the night: The current state of the human rights and development debate seen through the lens of the millennium development goals. Human Rights Quarterly, 27(3), 755–756.
Ban Ki Moon (2016) http://www.unmultimedia.org/radio/english/2016/07/restore-peoples-trust-in-global-economy-by-implementing-sdgs-urges-ban/#.V5xluY78EY0
Besette, G. (2004). Involving the community: A guide to participatory development communication. Penang: Southbound/IDRC.
Blewitt, J. (Ed.). (2008). Community, empowerment and sustainable development. Devon: Green Books.
Brown, K. (2016). Resilience, development and global change. London: Routledge.
Byrne, Elaine, Nicholson, Brian, & Salem, Fadi. (2011). Information communication technologies and the millennium development goals. Information Technology for Development, 17(1), 1–3.
CCSDG (2015) Final Report: Communication/culture and the sustainable development goals (CCSDG): Challenges for a new generation. Thailand: Chiang Mai University, 17–21 December 2015.
Chambers, R. (2008). Revolutions in development inquiry. London: Earthscan.
Easterly, W. (2006) The White Man’s burden. Why the West’s efforts to aid the rest have done so much ill and so little good. New York: Penguin Books.
Espinosa, A., & Walker, J. (2011). A complexity approach to sustainability. Theory and application. London: Imperial College Press.
Flint, W. (2007), Sustainability Manifesto. Exploring sustainability: Getting inside the concept. http://www.eeeee.net/sd_manifesto.htm Accessed on July 21, 2015.
Ford, L. (2015). Sustainable development goals: All you need to know. The Guardian. Retrieved from: http://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2015/jan/19/sustainable-development-goals-united-nations
Freire, P. (1983). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum.
Goodall, C. (2012). Sustainability. All that matters. London: Hodder & Stoughton (Winner of the Clarion Award for non-fiction).
Grossman, N. (Ed.). (2015). Thailand’s sustainable development sourcebook. Bangkok: Editions Didier Millet (EDM).
Hak, T. S. J., & Moldan, B. (2016). Sustainable development goals: A need for relevant indicators. Ecological Indicators, 60, 565–573.
Hilty, L., & Aebischer, B. (Eds.). (2015). ICT innovations for sustainability. Heidelberg: Springer.
Hopper, P. (2007). Understanding cultural globalization. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
Hopkins, R. (2008). The transition handbook: From oil dependency to local resilience. UK: Green Books.
Kanninen, Tapio. (2013). Crisis of global sustainability. London: Routledge.
Lennie, J., & Tacchi, J. (2013). Evaluating communication for development. A framework for social change. London: Routledge Earthscan.
Lesca, N. (Ed.). (2011). Environmental scanning and sustainable development. Hoboken NJ: Wiley.
Lie, R. (2003). Spaces of intercultural communication: An interdisciplinary introduction to communication, culture, and globalizing/localizing identities. Cresskill: Hampton.
Maclean, K. (2015). Cultural hybridity and the environment. Strategies to celebrate local and Indigenous knowledge. Heidelberg: Springer.
Malikhao, P. (2016). Effective health communication for sustainable development. New York: Nova Publishers.
Mansell, R., & Raboy, M. (eds.) (2014). The handbook of global media and communication policy. Chicester: Wiley Blackwell.
Manyozo, L. (2012). Media, communication and development. Three approaches. New Delhi: Sage.
Manzini, Ezio, & Jegou, F. (2003). Sustainable everyday. Scenarios of urban life. Edizioni Ambiente: Milan.
Max-Neef, M. (1991). Human scale development. Conception, application and further reflections. New York: The Apex Press.
McAnany, E. G. (2012). Saving the world: A brief history of communication for development and social change. Champaign: University of Illinois Press.
McMichael, P. (2008). Development and social change: A global perspective. Los Angeles: Pine Forge Press.
Nederveen Pieterse, J. (2010). Development theory (2nd ed.). Los Angeles: Sage.
Papa, M. J., Singhal, A., & Papa, W. (2006). Organizing for social change. A dialectic journey of theory and Praxis. New Delhi: Sage Publications.
Payutto, P. (1998). Sustainable development. Bangkok: Buddhadham Foundation.
Rockefeller Foundation (2013). 100 Resilient cities. http://www.100resilientcities.org/#/-_/. Accessed March 29, 2016.
Sachs, J. D. (2012). From millennium development goals to sustainable development goals. Lancet, 379(9832), 2206–2211.
Schmidpeter, R., Lu, H., Stehr, C., & Huang, H. (Eds.). (2015). Sustainable development and CSR in China. A multi-perspective approach. Heidelberg: Springer.
Scholte, J. (2005). Globalization: A critical introduction. New York: Palgrave.
SDSN (2015). Indicators and a monitoring framework for the sustainable development goals. Launching a data revolution for the SDGs. In: A report by the Leadership Council of the Sustainable Development Solutions Network. Revised working draft (June 22, 2015).
Sen, A. (2004). Cultural liberty and human development. In S. Fukuda-Parr (Ed.), Human development report: Cultural liberty in today’s diverse World. New York: United Nations Development Programme.
Servaes, J. (1999). Communication for development: One World, multiple cultures. Creskill, NJ: Hampton.
Servaes, J. (ed.) (2007). Communication for development. Making a difference—A WCCD background study. In World Congress on Communication for Development: Lessons, Challenges and the Way Forward (pp. 209–292). Washington, DC: World Bank.
Servaes, J. (2007). Harnessing the UN system into a common approach on communication for development. The International Communication Gazette, 69, 6, 483–507 (http://gaz.sagepub.com)
Servaes, J. (Ed.). (2008). Communication for development and social change. London: Sage.
Servaes, J. (2011). Social change. Oxford bibliographies online (OBO) (58 pp). New York: Oxford University Press http://www.oxfordbibliographiesonline.com/display/id/obo-9780199756841-0063
Servaes, J. (Ed.). (2013). Sustainability, participation and culture in communication. Theory and Praxis. Bristol-Chicago: Intellect-University of Chicago Press.
Servaes, J. (Ed.). (2014). Technological determinism and social change. Communication in a Tech-Mad World. Lanham: Lexington Books.
Servaes, J., & Lie, R. (2014). New Challenges for communication for sustainable development and social change. A review essay. Journal of Multicultural Discourses. (doi:10.1080/17447143.2014.982655)
Servaes, J., & Malikhao, P. (2007). Communication and sustainable development. FAO, Communication and sustainable development: Selected papers (pp. 1–38). Rome: FAO.
Servaes, J., & Malikhao, P. (2014). Communication for development and social change: Three development paradigms, two communication models, many applications and approaches 发展及社会变革传播学:三种发展理论,两种传播学模式,众多实践和方法 (Dr. Song Shi, trans.). In J. Hong (Ed.), New trends in communication studies (Vol. 1, pp. 20–45). Beijing: Tsinghua University Press (in Chinese) http://www.tup.com.cn http://www.wqbook.com
Jan, Servaes, & Oyedemi, Toks (Eds.). (2016). Social inequalities, media and communication. Theory and roots. Lanham: Lexington.
Servaes, J., Jacobson, T., & White, S. (Eds.). (1996). Participatory communication for social change. Sage: New Delhi. 287 pp.
Sivaraksa, S. (2009). Rediscovering spiritual value. Alternative to consumerism from a Siamese Buddhist perspective. Bangkok: Sathirakoses-Nagapradipa Foundation.
Sparks, C. (2007). Globalization, development and the mass media. London: Sage.
Sparks, J., & Rutkowski, D. (2016). Exploring project sustainability: Using a multi perspectival, multidimensional approach to frame design. Development in Practice, 26(3), 308–320.
The Economist. (2007, 7 July). The eight commandments, The Economist, London, 26–29.
UN (2013). A new global partnership: Eradicate poverty and transform economies through sustainable development. The Report of the High-Level Panel of Eminent Persons on the Post-2015 Development Agenda. New York: United Nations.
UN (2014). Millennium development goals report 2014. New York: United Nations.
UNDP (2006) Communication for Empowerment: developing media strategies in support of vulnerable groups. (Oslo, Norway) www.worldbank.org/wbi/news/docs/Severinoonfreepress.htm
UNDP (2010). Human Development Report 2010. The real wealth of nations: Pathways to human development. New York: United Nations Development Programme.
UNDP (2012) Mobile Technologies and empowerment: Enhancing human development through participation and innovation. Available at: http://undpegov.org
UNDP (2014) Human development report: Sustaining human progress: Reducing vulnerabilities and building resilience.
UNDP (2015) Human development report: Rethinking work for human development.
United Nations Secretary-General’s High-level Panel on Global Sustainability. (2012). Resilient people, resilient planet: A future worth choosing. NY: UN. ISBN (e978-92-1-055304-9).
UNSC (2015). Technical report by the Bureau of the United Nations Statistical Commission on the process of the development of an indicator framework for the goals and targets of the post-2015 development agenda (Working draft). Retrieved from: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/6754Technical%20report%20of%20the%20UNSC%20Bureau%20%28final%29.pdf
Van Norren, DDorine, E. (2012). The wheel of development: The millennium development goals as a communication and development tool. Third World Quarterly, 33(5), 825–836.
Vandemoortele, Jan. (2011a). If not the millennium development goals, then what? Third World Quarterly, 32(1), 9–25.
Vandemoortele, Jan. (2011b). The MDG story: Intention denied. Development and Change, 42(1), 1–21.
Waisbord, S. (2006). “Where is communication in the Millennium Development Goals?”. Media Development, LIII (3), 3–6
Whaley, D., Weaver, L., & Born, P. (2010). Approaches to measuring: Community change indicators. Waterloo ON: Tamarack. www.tamarackcommunity.ca
Wilkins, K., Tufte, T., & Obregon, R. (Eds.). (2014). The handbook of development communication and social change. New York: Wiley-Blackwell.
World Commission on Environment and Development (1987). Our common future. Published as Annex to General Assembly document A/42/427, Development and International Co-operation: Environment. New York NY: UN.
World Economic Forum (2012). Global risks 2012 (7th edition). In An initiative of the risk response network. Geneva: WEF.
Zolli, A., & Healy, M. (2012). Resilience: Why things bounce back. New York, NY: Free Press.
Acknowledgments
In addition to the organizations and institutions that assisted in the organization of the conference, we wish to explicitly thank Gwang-Jo Kim, director, and Misako Ito, adviser in Communication and Information, at UNESCO’s Office in Bangkok; Kanchana Kulpisithicharoen, who coordinated the work of the local organizing committee; and the members of the scientific committee: Fackson Banda (UNESCO, Paris, France), Prof. em. Royal Colle (Cornell University, USA), Dr. Maria Francesch-Huidobro (City University of Hong Kong), Ms Lucia Grenna (C4C, World Bank , Washington DC, USA), Prof. Rico Lie (Wageningen University, Netherlands), Dr. Patchanee Malikhao (Fecund Communication, Hong Kong), Prof. Kiran Prasad (Sri Padmavati Mahila University, Tirupati, India), Prof. Rachel Khan (University of the Philippines, Diliman, Philippines), Prof. Marianne Sison (RMIT Melbourne, Australia), Dr. Song Shi (McGill University, Montreal, Canada), Prof. Jo Tacchi (RMIT Melbourne, Australia), Prof. Chayan Vaddhanaphuti (Chiang Mai University, Thailand), Prof. Karin Wilkins (University of Texas at Austin, USA), and Prof. Loes Witteveen (Wageningen University, Netherlands). We also wish to acknowledge and thank Ms. Jayanthie Krishnan, publishing editor, Mr. Vishal Daryanomel, editorial assistant, and Mr. Naga Kumar, project coordinator, at Springer Nature in Singapore, for their support and assistance.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendices
Annex 1: The Millennium Development Goals (2000–2015)
At the Millennium Summit in September 2000 the largest gathering of world leaders in history adopted the UN Millennium Declaration, committing their nations to a new global partnership to reduce extreme poverty and setting out a series of time-bound targets, with a deadline of 2015, that have become known as the Millennium Development Goals.
The Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) are the world’s time-bound and quantified targets for addressing extreme poverty in its many dimensions—income poverty, hunger, disease, lack of adequate shelter, and exclusion—while promoting gender equality, education, and environmental sustainability. They are also basic human rights—the rights of each person on the planet to health, education, shelter, and security.
-
Goal 1: Eradicate Extreme Hunger and Poverty
-
Goal 2: Achieve Universal Primary Education
-
Goal 3: Promote Gender Equality and Empower Women
-
Goal 4: Reduce Child Mortality
-
Goal 5: Improve Maternal Health
-
Goal 6: Combat HIV/AIDS, Malaria and other diseases
-
Goal 7: Ensure Environmental Sustainability
-
Goal 8: Develop a Global Partnership for Development
The world has made significant progress in achieving many of the Goals. Between 1990 and 2002 average overall incomes increased by approximately 21 %. The number of people in extreme poverty declined by an estimated 130 million. Child mortality rates fell from 103 deaths per 1000 live births a year to 88. Life expectancy rose from 63 years to nearly 65 years. An additional 8 % of the developing world’s people received access to water. And an additional 15 % acquired access to improved sanitation services.
But progress has been far from uniform across the world—or across the Goals. There are huge disparities across and within countries. Within countries, poverty is greatest for rural areas, though urban poverty is also extensive, growing, and underreported by traditional indicators.
Sub-Saharan Africa is the epicenter of crisis, with continuing food insecurity, a rise of extreme poverty, stunningly high child and maternal mortality, and large numbers of people living in slums, and a widespread shortfall for most of the MDGs. Asia is the region with the fastest progress, but even there hundreds of millions of people remain in extreme poverty, and even fast-growing countries fail to achieve some of the non-income Goals. Other regions have mixed records, notably Latin America, the transition economies, and the Middle East and North Africa, often with slow or no progress on some of the Goals and persistent inequalities undermining progress on others.
The final MDG Report found that the 15-year effort has produced the most successful anti-poverty movement in history:
-
Since 1990, the number of people living in extreme poverty has declined by more than half.
-
The proportion of undernourished people in the developing regions has fallen by almost half.
-
The primary school enrolment rate in the developing regions has reached 91 percent, and many more girls are now in school compared to 15 years ago.
-
Remarkable gains have also been made in the fight against HIV/AIDS, malaria and tuberculosis.
-
The under-five mortality rate has declined by more than half, and maternal mortality is down 45 % worldwide.
-
The target of halving the proportion of people who lack access to improved sources of water was also met.
The concerted efforts of national governments, the international community, civil society and the private sector have helped expand hope and opportunity for people around the world.
Yet the job is unfinished for millions of people—we need to go the last mile on ending hunger, achieving full gender equality, improving health services and getting every child into school. Now we must shift the world onto a sustainable path.
Sources:
Annex 2: The Sustainable Development Goals (2015–2030)
At the United Nations Sustainable Development Summit on 25 September 2015, world leaders adopted the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, which includes a set of 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) to end poverty, fight inequality and injustice, and tackle climate change by 2030.
The Sustainable Development Goals build on the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), eight anti-poverty targets that the world committed to achieving by 2015. Enormous progress has been made on the MDGs, showing the value of a unifying agenda underpinned by goals and targets. Despite this success, the indignity of poverty has not been ended for all.
The new SDGs, and the broader sustainability agenda, go much further than the MDGs, addressing the root causes of poverty and the universal need for development that works for all people.
Liz Ford of The Guardian summarizes the SDGs as follows: “Sustainable development goals: all you need to know”
Are Governments Happy about the Proposed 17 Goals?
The majority seem to be, but a handful of member states, including the UK and Japan, aren’t so keen. Some countries feel that an agenda consisting of 17 goals is too unwieldy to implement or sell to the public, and would prefer a narrower brief. Or so they say. Some believe the underlying reason is to get rid of some of the more uncomfortable goals, such as those relating to the environment. Britain’s prime minister, David Cameron, has publicly said he wants 12 goals at the most, preferably 10. It’s not clear, though, which goals the UK government would like taken out if they had the choice.
Amina Mohammed, the UN secretary general’s special adviser on post-2015 development planning, said it had been a hard fight to get the number of goals down to 17, so there would be strong resistance to reducing them further.
Some NGOs also believe there are too many goals, but there is a general consensus that it is better to have 17 goals that include targets on women’s empowerment, good governance, and peace and security, for example, than fewer goals that don’t address these issues.
How Will the Goals be Measured?
The indicators are still being thrashed out by an expert group. Each indicator is being assessed for its feasibility, suitability and relevance, and roughly two for each target are expected. The indicators are due to be finalised in March 2016.
How Will the Goals be Funded?
That’s the trillion-dollar question. Rough calculations from the intergovernmental committee of experts on sustainable development financing have put the cost of providing a social safety net to eradicate extreme poverty at about $66 bn a year, while annual investments in improving infrastructure (water, agriculture, transport, power) could be up to a total of $7 tn globally.
In its 2015 report, the committee said public finance and aid would be central to support the implementation of the SDGs. But it insisted that money generated from the private sector, through tax reforms, and through a crackdown on illicit financial flows and corruption, was also vital.
A major conference on financing for the SDGs, held in the Ethiopian capital Addis Ababa in July 2015, failed to ease concerns that there will not be enough cash to meet the aspirational nature of the goals. The UN said the Addis Ababa action agenda (AAAA for short) contained “bold measures to overhaul global finance practices and generate investment” for tackling the challenges of sustainable development. It included a recommitment to the UN target on aid spending—0.7 % of GNI—set more than 40 years ago and pledges to collect more taxes and fight tax evasion. But civil society groups were less impressed, saying the summit had failed to produce new money to fund the goals, or offer ways to transform the international finance system. Calls for a new international tax body fell on deaf ears.
Sources:
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Servaes, J. (2017). Introduction: From MDGs to SDGs. In: Servaes, J. (eds) Sustainable Development Goals in the Asian Context. Communication, Culture and Change in Asia, vol 2. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2815-1_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2815-1_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-2814-4
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-2815-1
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)