Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Non-invasive Assessment of Myocardial Ischemia

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Coronary Imaging and Physiology

  • 1901 Accesses

Abstract

Please check the hierarchy of the section headings and correct if necessary.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Blankstein R, Di Carli MF. Integration of coronary anatomy and myocardial perfusion imaging. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2010;7:226–36

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Toth G, Hamilos M, Pyxaras S, et al. Evolving concepts of angiogram: fractional flow reserve discordances in 4000 coronary stenoses. Eur Heart J. 2014;35:2831–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Yang DH, Kim YH, Roh JH, et al. Stress myocardial perfusion CT in patients suspected of having coronary artery disease: visual and quantitative analysis-validation by using fractional flow reserve. Radiology. 2015;276:715

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Greenwood JP, Maredia N, Younger JF, et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance and single-photon emission computed tomography for diagnosis of coronary heart disease (CE-MARC): a prospective trial. Lancet. 2012;379:453–60

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Takx RA, Blomberg BA, El Aidi H, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of stress myocardial perfusion imaging compared to invasive coronary angiography with fractional flow reserve meta-analysis. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;8:e002666

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Williams MC, Newby DE. CT myocardial perfusion imaging: current status and future directions. Clin Radiol. 2016;71:739–49

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sorgaard MH, Kofoed KF, Linde JJ, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of static CT perfusion for the detection of myocardial ischemia. A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2016;10:450

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Rocha-Filho JA, Blankstein R, Shturman LD, et al. Incremental value of adenosine-induced stress myocardial perfusion imaging with dual-source CT at cardiac CT angiography. Radiology. 2010;254:410–9

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Feuchtner G, Goetti R, Plass A, et al. Adenosine stress high-pitch 128-slice dual-source myocardial computed tomography perfusion for imaging of reversible myocardial ischemia: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011;4:540–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Nasis A, Ko BS, Leung MC, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of combined coronary angiography and adenosine stress myocardial perfusion imaging using 320-detector computed tomography: pilot study. Eur Radiol. 2013;23:1812–21

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Carrascosa PM, Deviggiano A, Capunay C, et al. Incremental value of myocardial perfusion over coronary angiography by spectral computed tomography in patients with intermediate to high likelihood of coronary artery disease. Eur J Radiol. 2015;84:637–42

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Magalhaes TA, Kishi S, George RT, et al. Combined coronary angiography and myocardial perfusion by computed tomography in the identification of flow-limiting stenosis - the CORE320 study: an integrated analysis of CT coronary angiography and myocardial perfusion. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2015;9:438–45

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Huber AM, Leber V, Gramer BM, et al. Myocardium: dynamic versus single-shot CT perfusion imaging. Radiology. 2013;269:378–86

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Rossi A, Uitterdijk A, Dijkshoorn M, et al. Quantification of myocardial blood flow by adenosine-stress CT perfusion imaging in pigs during various degrees of stenosis correlates well with coronary artery blood flow and fractional flow reserve. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013;14:331–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bamberg F, Becker A, Schwarz F, et al. Detection of hemodynamically significant coronary artery stenosis: incremental diagnostic value of dynamic CT-based myocardial perfusion imaging. Radiology. 2011;260:689–98

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bamberg F, Marcus RP, Becker A, et al. Dynamic myocardial CT perfusion imaging for evaluation of myocardial ischemia as determined by MR imaging. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014;7:267–77

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ko BS, Cameron JD, Leung M, et al. Combined CT coronary angiography and stress myocardial perfusion imaging for hemodynamically significant stenoses in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: a comparison with fractional flow reserve. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012;5:1097–111

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Wang Y, Qin L, Shi X, et al. Adenosine-stress dynamic myocardial perfusion imaging with second-generation dual-source CT: comparison with conventional catheter coronary angiography and SPECT nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012;198:521–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kim SM, Chang SA, Shin W, Choe YH. Dual-energy CT perfusion during pharmacologic stress for the assessment of myocardial perfusion defects using a second-generation dual-source CT: a comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2014;38:44–52

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Wichmann JL, Meinel FG, Schoepf UJ, et al. Semiautomated global quantification of left ventricular myocardial perfusion at stress dynamic CT: diagnostic accuracy for detection of territorial myocardial perfusion deficits compared to visual assessment. Acad Radiol. 2016;23:429–37

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Gould KL, Johnson NP, Bateman TM, et al. Anatomic versus physiologic assessment of coronary artery disease. Role of coronary flow reserve, fractional flow reserve, and positron emission tomography imaging in revascularization decision-making. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62:1639–53

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Min JK, Taylor CA, Achenbach S, et al. Noninvasive fractional flow reserve derived from coronary CT angiography: clinical data and scientific principles. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;8:1209–22

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Choy JS, Kassab GS. Scaling of myocardial mass to flow and morphometry of coronary arteries. J Appl Physiol. 2008;104:1281–6

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Kassab GS. Scaling laws of vascular trees: of form and function. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Phys. 2006;290:H894–903

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Lindstedt SL, Schaeffer PJ. Use of allometry in predicting anatomical and physiological parameters of mammals. Lab Anim. 2002;36:1–19

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. West GB, Brown JH, Enquist BJ. A general model for the origin of allometric scaling laws in biology. Science. 1997;276:122–6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Murray CD. The physiological principle of minimum work: I. The vascular system and the cost of blood volume. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1926;12:207–14

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Kamiya A, Togawa T. Adaptive regulation of wall shear stress to flow change in the canine carotid artery. Am J Phys. 1980;239:H14–21

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Wischgoll T, Choy JS, Kassab GS. Extraction of morphometry and branching angles of porcine coronary arterial tree from CT images. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2009;297:H1949–55

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Wilson RF, Wyche K, Christensen BV, Zimmer S, Laxson DD. Effects of adenosine on human coronary arterial circulation. Circulation. 1990;82:1595–606

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Koo BK, Erglis A, Doh JH, et al. Diagnosis of ischemia-causing coronary stenoses by noninvasive fractional flow reserve computed from coronary computed tomographic angiograms. Results from the prospective multicenter DISCOVER-FLOW (diagnosis of ischemia-causing Stenoses obtained via noninvasive fractional flow reserve) study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58:1989–97

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Min JK, Leipsic J, Pencina MJ, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of fractional flow reserve from anatomic CT angiography. JAMA. 2012;308:1237–45

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Norgaard BL, Leipsic J, Gaur S, et al. Diagnostic performance of noninvasive fractional flow reserve derived from coronary computed tomography angiography in suspected coronary artery disease: the NXT trial (analysis of coronary blood flow using CT angiography: next steps). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63:1145–55

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Wu W, Pan DR, Foin N, et al. Noninvasive fractional flow reserve derived from coronary computed tomography angiography for identification of ischemic lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2016;6:29409

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Douglas PS, De Bruyne B, Pontone G, et al. 1-year outcomes of FFRCT-guided care in patients with suspected coronary disease: the PLATFORM study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;68:435–45

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Choi JH, Min JK, Labounty TM, et al. Intracoronary transluminal attenuation gradient in coronary CT angiography for determining coronary artery stenosis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011;4:1149–57

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Choi JH, Kim EK, Kim SM, et al. Noninvasive evaluation of coronary collateral arterial flow by coronary computed tomographic angiography. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014;7:482–90

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Stuijfzand WJ, Danad I, Raijmakers PG, et al. Additional value of transluminal attenuation gradient in CT angiography to predict hemodynamic significance of coronary artery stenosis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014;7:374–86

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Wong DT, Ko BS, Cameron JD, et al. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of combined assessment using adenosine stress computed tomography perfusion + computed tomography angiography with transluminal attenuation gradient + computed tomography angiography against invasive fractional flow reserve. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63:1904–12

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Steigner ML, Mitsouras D, Whitmore AG, et al. Iodinated contrast opacification gradients in normal coronary arteries imaged with prospectively ECG-gated single heart beat 320-detector row computed tomography. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010;3:179–86

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Yoon YE, Choi JH, Kim JH, et al. Noninvasive diagnosis of ischemia-causing coronary stenosis using CT angiography: diagnostic value of transluminal attenuation gradient and fractional flow reserve computed from coronary CT angiography compared to invasively measured fractional flow reserve. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012;5:1088–96

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Choi JH, Koo BK, Yoon YE, et al. Diagnostic performance of intracoronary gradient-based methods by coronary computed tomography angiography for the evaluation of physiologically significant coronary artery stenoses: a validation study with fractional flow reserve. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012;13:1001–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Chow BJ, Kass M, Gagne O, et al. Can differences in corrected coronary opacification measured with computed tomography predict resting coronary artery flow? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;57:1280–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Gewirtz H, Dilsizian V. Integration of quantitative positron emission tomography absolute myocardial blood flow measurements in the clinical management of coronary artery disease. Circulation. 2016;133:2180–96

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Bovenschulte H, Krug B, Schneider T, et al. CT coronary angiography: coronary CT-flow quantification supplements morphological stenosis analysis. Eur J Radiol. 2013;82:608–16

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Ko BS, Wong DT, Norgaard BL, et al. Diagnostic performance of transluminal attenuation gradient and noninvasive fractional flow reserve derived from 320-detector row CT angiography to diagnose hemodynamically significant coronary stenosis: an NXT substudy. Radiology. 2016;279:75–83

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Lardo AC, Rahsepar AA, Seo JH, et al. Estimating coronary blood flow using CT transluminal attenuation flow encoding: formulation, preclinical validation, and clinical feasibility. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2015;9:559–66. e1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Anderson HV, Stokes MJ, Leon M, Abu-Halawa SA, Stuart Y, Kirkeeide RL. Coronary artery flow velocity is related to lumen area and regional left ventricular mass. Circulation. 2000;102:48–54

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Leone AM, De Caterina AR, Basile E, et al. Influence of the amount of myocardium subtended by a stenosis on fractional flow reserve. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2013;6:29–36

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Dewey FE, Rosenthal D, Murphy DJ Jr, Froelicher VF, Ashley EA. Does size matter? Clinical applications of scaling cardiac size and function for body size. Circulation. 2008;117:2279–87

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Seiler C, Kirkeeide RL, Gould KL. Measurement from arteriograms of regional myocardial bed size distal to any point in the coronary vascular tree for assessing anatomic area at risk. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993;21:783–97

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Huo Y, Kassab GS. Intraspecific scaling laws of vascular trees. J R Soc Interface. 2012;9:190–200

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Kim HY, Lim HS, Doh JH, et al. Physiological severity of coronary artery stenosis depends on the amount of myocardial mass subtended by the coronary artery. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;9:1548–60

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Kang SJ, Kweon J, Yang DH, et al. Mathematically derived criteria for detecting functionally significant stenoses using coronary computed tomographic angiography-based myocardial segmentation and intravascular ultrasound-measured minimal lumen area. Am J Cardiol. 2016;118:170–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Sandoval Y, Smith SW, Thordsen SE, Apple FS. Supply/demand type 2 myocardial infarction: should we be paying more attention? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63:2079–87

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Gibbons RJ, Miller TD. Should extensive myocardial ischaemia prompt revascularization to improve outcomes in chronic coronary artery disease? Eur Heart J. 2015;36:2281–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. De Bruyne B, Fearon WF, Pijls NH, et al. Fractional flow reserve-guided PCI for stable coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:1208–17

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Johnson NP, Toth GG, Lai D, et al. Prognostic value of fractional flow reserve: linking physiologic severity to clinical outcomes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64:1641–54

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Van Belle E, Rioufol G, Pouillot C, et al. Outcome impact of coronary revascularization strategy reclassification with fractional flow reserve at time of diagnostic angiography: insights from a large French multicenter fractional flow reserve registry. Circulation. 2014;129:173–85

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Christakopoulos GE, Christopoulos G, Carlino M, et al. Meta-analysis of clinical outcomes of patients who underwent percutaneous coronary interventions for chronic total occlusions. Am J Cardiol. 2015;115:1367–75

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Hachamovitch R, Hayes SW, Friedman JD, Cohen I, Berman DS. Comparison of the short-term survival benefit associated with revascularization compared with medical therapy in patients with no prior coronary artery disease undergoing stress myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography. Circulation. 2003;107:2900–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Chen SL, Ye F, Zhang JJ, et al. Randomized comparison of FFR-guided and angiography-guided provisional stenting of true coronary bifurcation lesions: the DKCRUSH-VI trial (double kissing crush versus provisional stenting technique for treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions VI). JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;8:536–46

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Ladwiniec A, Cunnington MS, Rossington J, et al. Collateral donor artery physiology and the influence of a chronic total occlusion on fractional flow reserve. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;8:e002219

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Choi JH, Chang SA, Choi JO, et al. Frequency of myocardial infarction and its relationship to angiographic collateral flow in territories supplied by chronically occluded coronary arteries. Circulation. 2013;127:703–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Ortiz-Perez JT, Rodriguez J, Meyers SN, Lee DC, Davidson C, Wu E. Correspondence between the 17-segment model and coronary arterial anatomy using contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2008;1:282–93

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Itu L, Rapaka S, Passerini T, et al. A machine-learning approach for computation of fractional flow reserve from coronary computed tomography. J Appl Physiol. 2016;121:42–52

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Fokkema ML, James SK, Albertsson P, et al. Population trends in percutaneous coronary intervention: 20-year results from the SCAAR (Swedish coronary angiography and angioplasty registry). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61:1222–30

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Departments of Emergency Medicine and Internal Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea

    Jin-Ho Choi

  2. Department of Medicine, Sejong General Hospital, Bucheon, South Korea

    Ki-Hyun Jeon

  3. Department of Medicine, Jeju National University Hospital, Jeju National University College of Medicine, Jeju, South Korea

    Hyung-Yoon Kim

Authors
  1. Jin-Ho Choi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ki-Hyun Jeon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hyung-Yoon Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jin-Ho Choi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Cardiology, Severance Cardiovascular Hospital , Seoul, Korea (Republic of)

    Myeong-Ki Hong

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Choi, JH., Jeon, KH., Kim, HY. (2018). Non-invasive Assessment of Myocardial Ischemia. In: Hong, MK. (eds) Coronary Imaging and Physiology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2787-1_31

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2787-1_31

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-2786-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-2787-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation