Overview of Detection and Estimation of High-Speed Railway Catenary

Chapter
Part of the Advances in High-speed Rail Technology book series (ADVHIGHSPEED)

Abstract

The current collection quality of pantograph-catenary system directly determines the stability and safe operation of power supply in high-speed railway, and is also one of the key factors that determine the maximum running speed of the train.

References

  1. 1.
    Han Z, Liu Z, Zhang G, Yang H (2013) Overview of non-contact image detection technology for the pantograph-catenary monitoring. J China Railway 35(6):40–47Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    O’ Donnell C, Palacin R, Rosinski J (2006) Pantograph damage and wear monitoring system. In: The Institution of engineering and technology international conference on railway condition monitoring, pp 178–181Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Shing AWC, Pascoschi G (2006) Contact wire wear measurement and data management. In The institution of engineering and technology international conference on railway condition monitoring, pp 182–187Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Boffi P, Cattaneo G, Amoriello L et al (2009) Optical fiber sensors to measure collector performance in the pantograph-catenary interaction. IEEE Sens J 9(6):635–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Liu J (1998) Non-contact inspection of parameter of overhead contact system. Electr Railway 02:43–45Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Liu F, Wang L, Gao X et al (2006) Study of measuring the contact force between pantograph and catenary. Electr Locomotives Mass Transit Veh 06:19–21Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ren S (2000) New pantograph wear detection and auto descending device. Railway Oper Technol 6(04):139–141Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wu J (1996) The system for detecting pull-out value of contact wire in electrified railway. J China Railway Soc 18(02):78–81Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Liu H, Wang L, Gao X (2004) Current situation and prospects of the detection technology for the contact-loss of pantograph on electric locomotive. Locomotive Rolling Stock Technol 6:1–4Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Liu Z, Liu S, Wu D et al (2004) The catenary geometric parameters measuring. Shandong Sci 17(01):67–69Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hofler H, Dambacher M, Dimopoulos N et al (2004) Monitoring and inspecting overhead wires and supporting structures. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., Parma, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Liu Y, Liu Z, Wen X et al (2002) A laser detecting device for measuring position of contact wire in OCS. Electr Railway 4:29–30Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Peng C, Wang L, Gao X et al (2004) Dynamic detection for the height of contact wire. Opto Electron Eng S1:91–93Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kuen LK, Lee TKY, Ho SL et al (2006) A novel intelligent train condition monitoring system coupling laser beam into image processing algorithm. Trans Hong Kong Inst Eng 13(1):27–33Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kimura S (1993) Development of an automated consumables control system. Japan Railway Eng 32(3):21–24Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Puschmann R, Wehrhahn D (2011) Ultrasonic measurement of contact wire position. eb—Elektrische Bahnen 109(7):323–324Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yin B, Wang B (2008) Application of ultrasonic ranging principle in monitoring abrasion of pantograph slider. Electr Drive Locomotives 05:57–59Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sun F, Wang B (2011) Ultrasonic detection method of abrasion of double slippers pantograph. Dev Innovation Mach Electr Prod 24(03):129–131Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zhang T (2008) Study and improvement on the OCS inspection system based on image processing. Railway Locomotive Car 28(6):68–71Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Niwakawa M, Onda T, Kinoshita N (2007) Stereo vision based measurement of intersections of overhead contact wires and pantograph of Kyushushinkansen. IEEJ Trans Ind Appl 127(2):118–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kusumi S, Nezu K, Nagasawa H (2000) Overhead contact line inspection system by rail-and-road car. Q Rep RTRI 41(4):169–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Nakama F, Ichikawa M, Nagasawa H (1984) Measurement of contact loss by detection spark. Q Rep RTRI 25(3):95–98Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hayasaka T, Shimizu M, Nezu K (2009) Development of contact-loss measuring system using ultraviolet ray detection. Q Rep RTRI 50(3):131–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Landi A, Menconi L, Sani L (2006) Hough transform and thermo-vision for monitoring pantograph-catenary system. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part F J Rail Rapid Transit 220(4):435–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hulin B, Schussler S (2007) Concepts for day-night stereo obstacle detection in the pantograph gauge. In: 2007 5th IEEE international conference on industrial informatics, pp 449–454Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Jiang J (2009) The design and realization of catenary wind deviation. Central South University, ChangshaGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Yang K, Wang L, Gao X et al (2009) Application of CCD measurement technique for wear on pantograph sliding plates. In: 4th international symposium on advanced optical manufacturing and testing technologies, pp 728334–728334-7Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Zhang Y, Wu W, Xu K (2007) Detection system of dynamic envelope line of pantograph based on machine vision. Electr Railway 6:29–30Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Chen K (2009) Development and implementation of wireless video monitoring system for locomotive pantograph. Southwest Jiaotong University, ChengduGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Fan H, Bian C, Zhu T et al (2010) Automatic detection of positioning line in contactless overhead contact system. J Comput Appl 30(S2):102–103Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Feng Q, Chen W, Wang Y et al (2010) Research on the algorithm to measure the pantographic slipper abrasion. J China Railway Soc 32(01):109–113Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Zhang G, Liu Z, Han Y et al (2013) A fast fuzzy matching method of fault detection for rod insulators of high-speed railways. J China Railway Soc 35(05):27–33MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Han Z, Liu Z, Chen K et al (2011) Pantograph slide cracks detection technology based on curvelet coefficients directional projection (CCDP). J China Railway Soc 33(11):63–69Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Chen K, Liu Z, Han Z (2012) Pantograph slipper cracks identification based on translational parallel window in curvelet transform domain. J China Railway Soc 34(10):44–46Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Han Z, Liu Z, Yang H et al (2013) Insulator fault detection based on curvelet coefficients morphology and zonal energy methods. J China Railway Soc 35(03):37–40Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Yang H, Liu Z, Han Z et al (2013) Foreign body detection between insulator pieces in electrified railway based on affine moment invariant. J China Railway Soc 35(04):30–36Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Han Y, Liu Z, Han Z et al (2014) Fracture detection of ear pieces in catenary support devices of high-speed railway based on SIFT feature matching. J China Railway Soc 36(02):31–36Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Yang H, Liu Z, Han Y et al (2013) Defective condition detection of insulators in electrified railway based on feature matching of speeded-up robust features. Power Syst Technol 37(8):2297–2302Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Zhang W, Mei G, Chen L (2000) Analysis of the influence of catenary’s sag and irregularity upon the quality of current-feeding. J China Railway Soc 22(6):50–54Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Aboshi M, Manabe K (2000) Analyses of contact force fluctuation between catenary and pantograph. Q Rep RTRI 41(4):182–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Collina A, Fossati F, Papi M et al (2007) Impact of overhead line irregularity on current collection and diagnostics based on the measurement of pantograph dynamics. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part F: J Rail Rapid Transit 221(4):547–559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Bucca G, Collina A (2009) A procedure for the wear prediction of collector strip and contact wire in pantograph–catenary system. Wear 266(1):46–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Van Vo O, Massat JP, Laurent C et al (2014) Introduction of variability into pantograph–catenary dynamic simulations. Veh Syst Dyn 52(10):1254–1269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Howa F (1995) Research on the high speed of the flow system of the new main line. Electr Traction Express 10:20–25Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Aboshi M (2004) Precise measurement and estimation method for overhead contact line unevenness. IEE J T Ind Appl 124:871–877CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Zhang W, Mei G, Wu X et al (2002) Hybrid simulation of dynamics for the pantograph-catenary system. Veh Syst Dyn 38(6):393–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Huan R, Jiao J, Su G et al (2012) Dynamics of pantograph-catenary coupled system with contact wire vertical irregularities. J China Railway Soc 34(7):15–21Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Xie J, Liu Z, Han Z et al (2009) Pantograph and overhead contact line coupling dynamic model simulation and analysis of imbalance of overhead contact line. Electr Railway 6:23–26Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Liu Z, Han Z (2011) Review of researches on catenary spectrum in electrified railway. Electr Railway 1:1–3Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Liu Z, Han Z (2013) Study on electrical railway catenary line spectrum based on AR model. J China Railway Soc 35(12):24–29Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Jiang Y, Zhang W, Song D (2015) Study on the contact wire unevenness of high-speed railway. J China Railway Soc 37(2):34–38Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Bruni S, Ambrosio J, Carnicero A et al (2015) The results of the pantograph–catenary interaction benchmark. Veh Syst Dyn 53(3):412–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Kim JW, Chae HC, Park BS et al (2007) State sensitivity analysis of the pantograph system for a high-speed rail vehicle considering span length and static uplift force. J Sound Vib 303(3):405–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Wang H, Liu Z, Han Z et al (2014) Feature extraction of pantograph-catenary contact force power spectrum of electrified railway. J China Railway Soc 36(11):23–28MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Kusumi S, Fukutani T, Nezu K (2006) Diagnosis of overhead contact line based on contact force. Q Rep RTRI 47(1):39–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Rønnquist A, Nåvik P (2015) Dynamic assessment of existing soft catenary systems using modal analysis to explore higher train velocities: a case study of a Norwegian contact line system. Veh Syst Dyn 53(6):756–774CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Kudo S, Honda S, Ikeda M (2002) Contact force signal analysis of current collecting with bispectrum and wavelet. In: Proceedings of the 41st SICE annual conference, IEEE, vol 4, pp 2478–2482Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Kim JS (2007) An experimental study of the dynamic characteristics of the catenary-pantograph interface in high speed trains. J Mech Sci Technol 21(12):2108–2116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Han Z (2013) The dynamic characteristics assessment of high-speed catenary-pantograph based on modern spectrum analysis and intelligent fault image identification. Southwest Jiaotong University Graduate Thesis, ChengduGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Han Z, Liu Z, Zhang X et al (2013) Pantograph-catenary contact force data analysis based on data correlation decomposed by EEMD. J China Railway Soc 35(9):25–30Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Wang H, Liu Zhigang, Song Yang (2015) Analysis on wavelength components in pantograph-catenary contact force of electric railway based on multiple EEMD. J China Railway Soc 37(5):34–41MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Rønnquist A, Nåvik P (2015) Dynamic assessment of existing soft catenary systems using modal analysis to explore higher train velocities: a case study of a Norwegian contact line system. Veh Syst Dyn 53(6):756–774CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Usuda T (2007) Estimation of wear and strain of contact wire using contact force of pantograph. Q Rep RTRI 48(3):170–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Mariscotti A, Marrese A, Pasquino N et al (2013) Time and frequency characterization of radiated disturbance in telecommunication bands due to pantograph. Measurement 46(10):4342–4352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Liu Z, Song Y, Han Y et al (2016) Advances of research on high-speed railway catenary. J Southwest Jiaotong Univ 51(3):495–518Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Electrical EngineeringSouthwest Jiaotong UniversityChengduChina

Personalised recommendations