Advertisement

Profiling Mathematics Teacher Professional Development in Malaysia

  • Chin Mon ChiewEmail author
  • Chap Sam Lim
Chapter
Part of the Mathematics Education – An Asian Perspective book series (MATHEDUCASPER)

Abstract

This chapter is aimed to provide an insight of mathematics teacher professional development in Malaysia. In general, there exist two strands on what constitute or perceive as teacher professional development in the Malaysian context. On one strand, the education agencies under the Ministry of Education (MOE) conduct in-service courses and workshops for teachers to cater the requirements and changes in the mathematics curriculum. This is meant to ensure that teachers are competent to teach and deliver what is transpired in the curriculum. On the other strand, research-based projects such as action research and Lesson Study have provided some autonomy and empowerment for teachers to dictate their own professional development. Both strands of teacher professional development would have direct or indirect influence towards teachers’ teaching. The discussion includes some contemporary issues pertaining to the mathematics teacher professional development. It was observed that generally, teachers show little interest and commitment towards their professional development even though they are aware of its importance in their teaching. The factors are attributed to the over emphasis of examination, administrators’ leadership, teachers’ skepticism and lack of structural support in school for teachers’ professional development. In recent years, the MOE mandated several policies that aimed to put emphasis on teacher professional development such as making it a compulsory requirement for career advancement. There are also efforts to make professional development a school-based programme through teacher collaboration. These would deem more effective and practical in long term as indicated in the research and literatures that promote and support teachers to be self-committed, motivated, and yearning for professional development.

Keywords

Professional development In-service programmes Action research Lesson study 

References

  1. Abd Rahman, S. (2008). Penggunaan Abakus Dalam Proses Pengajaran and Pembelajaran di Bilik Darjah. Jurnal Penyelidikan Pendidikan, Jld. 1. Jabatan Pelajaran Wilayah Persekutuan Labuan, pp. 59–71.Google Scholar
  2. Badrul Hisham, A. O. (2001). Peningkatan Kemahiran Teknologi Maklumat di Kalangan Peserta Kursus Dalam Perkhidmatan 14 Minggu Komputer Dalam Pendidikan dan Latihan Guru Sekolah Bestari. Maktab Perguruan Ipoh Perak.Google Scholar
  3. Bahagian Perancangan Dan Penyelidikan Dasar Pendidikan. (2008). Buku Manual Kajian Tindakan Edisi Tiga. Malaysia: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.Google Scholar
  4. Chee, K. M. (2010). Kajian Tindakan: Dari Proses ke Produk. Pulau Pinang: UPPA, Universiti Sains Malaysia.Google Scholar
  5. Chiew, C. M., & Lim, C. S. (2003). Impact of lesson study on mathematics trainee teachers. Paper presented at the International Conference for Mathematics and Science Education, 14–16 October 2003. University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur.Google Scholar
  6. Chiew, C. M. (2009). Implementation of Lesson Study as an innovative professional development model among mathematics teachers. Unpublished Ph. D. thesis, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang.Google Scholar
  7. Federal Inspectorate of Schools. (1994). Kajian Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran Matematik KBSM, (Jun-Julai, 1992). Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia: Bahagian Buku Teks.Google Scholar
  8. Goh, S. C. (2007). Enhancing Mathematics Teachers’ Content Knowledge And Their Confidence In Teaching Mathematics Using English Through Lesson Study Process. Unpublished M.Ed. thesis, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang.Google Scholar
  9. Goh, S. C., Tan, K. A., & Lim, C. S. (2007). Engaging in Lesson Study: Our experience. In C. S. Lim, et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 4th East Asia Regional Conference on Mathematics Education [EARCOME4] (pp. 574–579), 18–22 June 2007. Penang, Malaysia: Universiti Sains Malaysia.Google Scholar
  10. Kasmawati, C. O. (2006). Meninjau penggunaan Geometer’s Sketchpad di kalangan guru matematik sekolah menengah Pulau Pinang. Unpublished M.Ed. thesis, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang.Google Scholar
  11. Kim, P. L. (1997). The environments of action research in Malaysia. In S. Hollingsworth (Ed.), Action research: A casebook for educational reform (pp. 238–243). London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  12. Lim, C. S., Fatimah, S., & Tan, S. K. (2002). Cultural influences in teaching and learning of mathematics: Methodological challenges and constraints. In D. Edge & B. H. Yeap (Eds.), Proceedings of Second East Asia Regional Conference on Mathematics Education and Ninth Southeast Asian Conference on Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, pp. 138–149). Singapore: National Institute of Education.Google Scholar
  13. Lim, C. S., White, A., & Chiew, C. M. (2005). Promoting mathematics teacher collaboration through lesson study: What can we learn from two countries’ experience. In A. Rogerson (Ed.), Proceedings of the 8th International Conference of The Mathematics Education into the 21st Century Project: “Reform, Revolution and Paradigm Shifts in Mathematics Education”, pp. 135–139. Google Scholar
  14. Lourdusamy, A., & Tan, S. K. (1992). Malaysia. In H. B. Leavitt (Ed.), Issues and problems in teacher education: An international handbook (pp. 179–191). New York: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  15. McKinsey. (2007). How the world’s best-performing school systems come out on top. New York: McKinsey & Company. Retrieved December 12, 2015, from http://mckinseyonsociety.com/how-the-worlds-best-performing-schools-come-out-on-top
  16. Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2012). Preliminary Report Malaysia Education Blueprint 2013–2025. Ministry of Education Malaysia. Retrieved December 12, 2015, from http://www.moe.gov.my/userfiles/file/PPP/Preliminary-Blueprint-Eng.pdf
  17. Mohd Majid, K. (1997). In search of good practice: A case study of Malaysian effective mathematics teachers classroom teaching. Journal of Science and Mathematics Education in Southeast Asia, XX(2), 8–20.Google Scholar
  18. Noor Azlan, A. Z. (1987). The Malaysian mathematics program: A case study of the difference between design intention and classroom implementation. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Wisconsin.Google Scholar
  19. Noraini, I., Loh, S. C., Norjoharuddeen, M. N., Ahmad Zabidi, A. R., & Rahimi, M. S. (2007). The professional preparation of Malaysian teachers in the implementation of teaching and learning of mathematics and science in English. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 3(2), 101–110.Google Scholar
  20. Ong, E. G. (2010). Changes in Mathematics Teachers’ Questioning Techniques Through Lesson Study Process. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang.Google Scholar
  21. Poon, C.Y. (2004). Kurikulum Yang Dihasratkan Dan Kurikulum Yang Dilaksanakan: Pengajaran Penyelesaian Masalah Matematik KBSM. Paper presented at Seminar Penyelidikan Pendidikan Kebangsaan Bahagian Pendidikan Guru. Google Scholar
  22. Ramlah, M. (2003). Keberkesanan Pengajaran Pensyarah Matematik dan Sains dalam Bahasa Inggeris di Maktab-maktab Perguruan: Satu tinjauan. Jurnal Pendidikan Guru, Bil. 16. Bahagian Pendidikan Guru, Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia, pp. 47–51.Google Scholar
  23. Subahan, M. M., Abd. Rashid, J., & Jamil, A. (2002). What motivates teachers to conduct research? Journal of Science and Mathematics Education in Southeast Asia, 25(1), 1–24.Google Scholar
  24. Supramaniam, A. (2002). Pelaksanaan Kurikulum Sekolah Bestari dalam Kalangan Guru Lepasan Kursus Dalam Perkhidmatan 14 Minggu (Sekolah Bestari) Di Melaka. Seminar Penyelidikan Pendidikan 2002. Maktab Perguruan Perempuan Melayu, 73–128.Google Scholar
  25. Teacher Education Division. (2003). Tracer study in-service courses under the World Bank Loan (1999–2002). Ministry of Education, Malaysia: Teacher Education Division.Google Scholar
  26. Walter, C., & Briggs, J. (2012). What professional development makes the most difference to teachers? Oxford University Press. Retrieved December 12, 2015, from http://www.education.ox.ac.uk/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/WalterBriggs_2012_TeacherDevelopment_public_v2.pdf
  27. Wong, S. W. (2003). Keberkesanan Pelaksanaan Kursus dalam Perkhidmatan 6 Minggu Matematik Guru Bukan Opsyen Matematik Sekolah Rendah. Cerana Jurnal Pendidikan, Maktab Perguruan Batu Pahat, Bil., 9, 6–20.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Teacher EducationPenangMalaysia
  2. 2.Universiti Sains MalaysiaPenangMalaysia

Personalised recommendations