Requirements Engineering for Pervasive Games Based Smart Learning Systems

  • Yemna MejbriEmail author
  • Maha Khemaja
  • Kaouther Raies
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Educational Technology book series (LNET)


The overlap of different features of pervasive games based smart learning systems (PGBSLSs) including the ludic aspect, the pervasive aspect and the educational aspect adds complexity to use requirements at design time and Runtime. Many methodologies and frameworks that make use of requirements models can be found in the literature, but very few of them use ontologies to ground the models that are used in PGBSLSs development. We propose in this paper a semantic model in the requirements engineering process in order to improve the development of PGBSLSs.


Pervasive games Smart Learning Requirements Engineering Ontology 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Salen, Katie and Zimmerman, Eric. Rules of Play: Game Design Fundamentals. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (2004)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
  3. 3.
    Alvarez J., et Djaouti D., « Introduction au Serious Game », Questions théoriques. (2010)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lavergne Boudier V., & Dambach Y., « Serious Game : Révolution pédagogique », HermesGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Alvarez J., Djaouti D. & Rampnoux O., « Typologie des Serious Games », dans Les jeux vidéo comme objet de recherche. Questions Théoriques, p. 46-65. (2011)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Michel H.-M., Kreziak D. & Heraud J.-M., « Evaluation de la performance des Serious Games pour l’apprentissage : Analyse du transfert de comportement des éleveurs virtuels de Vacheland », Systèmes d’Information et Management, 14(4), p.71-86. (2009)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Science Publications, 29 mai. 2010 Mouaheb, H., Fahli, A., Moussetad, M., Eljamali, S.: The Serious Game: What Educational Benefits? Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences; 46 (2012)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Markus Montola, Exploring the Edge of the Magic Circle. Defining Pervasive Games. DAC 2005 conference, December 1.-3. IT University of Copenhagen, (2005)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Markus Montola, Jaakko Stenros et Annika Waern (coll.): Pervasive Games: Theory and Design, Morgan Kaufmann, (2009)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    IEEE Computer Society “IEEE Standard Glossary of Software Engineering Terminology”. IEEE Standard (1990)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    AFIS, Modèle de données AFIS, version 2.0, groupe de travail Méthodes et Outils, (2005)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Grûber, T.: A translation approach to portable ontology specification. Knowledge Acquisition 5(2) (1993)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Allemang, D., Hendler, J.A.: Semantic web for the working ontologist: Modeling in RDF, RDFS and OWL. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2008).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Guarino, N., Carrara, M., and Giaretta, P. An Ontology of Meta-Level Categories. In J. Doyle, E. Sandewall and P. Torasso (eds.), Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference (KR94). Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA: 270-280.(1994)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    T. R. Gruber. A Translation Approach to Portable Ontologies. Knowledge Acquisition, 5(2):199–220, (1993)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mayank, V., Kositsyna, N., Austin, M.: Requirements Engineering and the Semantic Web, Part II. Representation, Management, and Validation of Requirements and System-Level Architectures. Technical Report. TR 2004-14, University of Maryland, (2004)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Decker, B., Rech, J., Ras, E., Klein, B., Hoecht, C.: Selforganized Reuse of Software Engineering Knowledge supported by Semantic Wikis. In: Proc. of Workshop on Semantic Web Enabled Software Engineering (SWESE). November, (2005)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lin, J., Fox, M. S.; Bilgic, T.: A Requirement Ontology for Engineering Design. Enterprise Integration Laboratory,, University of Toronto, Manuscript, September, (1996)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wouters, B., Deridder, D., Van Paesschen, E.: The Use of Ontologies as a Backbone for Use Case Management. In: “European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2000), Workshop : Objects and Classifications, a natural convergence”, (2000)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    S. Benford, A. Crabtree, M. Flintham, A. Drozd, R. Anastasi, M. Paxton, et al., “Can you see me now?,” ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact., vol. 13, pp. 100-133, (2006)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    C. Magerkurth, A. Cheok, R. Mandryk, and T. Nilsen, “Pervasive games: bringing computer entertainment back to the real world,” Computers in Entertainment (CIE), vol. 3, pp. 4-4, (2005)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Baker M. The roles of models in Artificial Intelligence and Education research: a prospective view, International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 11, 122-143. (2000)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Chen and J. Shih A Prototype on a Meta-model for Designing Instructional Pervasive Games. Fourth IEEE International Conference On Digital Game And Intelligent Toy Enhanced Learning. (2012)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Laine, T.H., Islas Sedano, C., Joy, M. and Sutinen, E. Critical factors for technology integration in game-based pervasive learning spaces, IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, vol 3, no 4, pp. 294 – 306. (2010)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    E. Serral, A MDD Strategy for developing Context-Aware Pervasive Systems, Universidad Politecnica de Valencia, (2008)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Omasreiter, H., Metzker, E.: A Context-Driven Use Case Creation Process for SpecifyingAutomotive Driver Assistance Systems. In: IEEE International Requirements EngineeringConf., pp. 334–339. IEEE, Los Alamitos (2004)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Mazuryk, L.K., Poulisse, G.J., van Eck, P.: Requirements Engineering for Pervasive Services. In: OOPSLA-workshop on Building Software for Pervasive Computing (2005)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    W. Sitou and B. Spanfelner, Towards Requirements Engineering for Context Adaptive Systems, Technische Universit¨at M¨unchen, Department of Informatics, Boltzmannstr.3, 85748 Garching/Munich, Germany, (2007)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Verónica Castañeda, Luciana C Ballejos et Maria Laura Caliusco : Improving the quality of software requirements specifications with semantic web technologies. (2012)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    G. Hong, H. Trætteberg, A. I. Wang, and M. Zhu, “TeMPS: A Conceptual Framework for Pervasive and Social Games,” in Third IEEE Information Conference on Digital Game and Intelligent Toy Enhanced Learning Kaohsiung, Taiwan, (2010)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    K. Jegers, “Pervasive Game Flow: Understanding Player Enjoyment in Pervasive Gaming,” ACM Computers in Entertainment, vol. 5, April (2007)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    A. Gentes, A. Guyot-Mbodji, and I. Demeure, “Gaming on the move: urban experience as a new paradigm for mobile pervasive game design,” Multimedia Systems, Vol. 16, pp. 43-55, doi:10.1007/s00530-009-0172-2 (2010)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    B. K. walther, “Notes on the methodology of pervasive gaming,” in, Entertainment Computing, Vol. 3711,, F. Kishino, Y. Kitamura, H. Kato & N. Nagata, Eds, pp. 488-495 (2005)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Schilit, B., Adams, N. Want, R. Context-Aware Computing Applications. 1st International Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications. pp 85-90. (1994)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Dey et Abowd Towards a better understanding of context and context-awareness, Graphics, Visualization and Usability Center and College of Computing, Georgia Institute of Technology, (1999)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Ryan N., Pascoe J., Morse D., Enhanced Reality Fieldwork: the Context- Aware Archeological Assistant, V. Gaffney, M. van Leusen, S. Exxon, Computer Applications in Archeology, (1997)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Derntl, M., & Hummel, K. A. Modeling Context-Aware E-learning Scenarios. Paper presented at the Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops, 2005. 3rd IEEE PerCom 2005 Workshops., 337-342. (2005)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Quintin, J.-J., Depover, C., & Degache, C. Le rôle du scénario pédagogique dans l’analyse d’une formation à distance. Paper presented at the Actes de la conférence EIAH, Paris, INRP, 335-340.(2005)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Paquette, G. Ingénierie Pédagogique. Québec: Presses de l’Univesité du Québec. (2002)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Pimmer, C., & Gröhbiel, U. (2008). Mobile Learning in corporate settings: Results from an Expert Survey. Paper presented at the International conference on mobile learning. mLearn 250-257. (2008)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    IMS_LD. IMS Learning Design Information Model, IMS Global Learning Consortium. From http :// (2003)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Scanlon, E., Jones, A. and Waycott, J. Mobile technologies: prospects for their use in learning in informal science settings. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 25, (2005)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Herrington, J. and Oliver, R. An Instructional Design Framework for Authentic Learning Environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 23-48. (2000)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Thomas, S. Pervasive, persuasive eLearning: modeling the pervasive learning space, Proceedings of IEEE PerCom Workshops (2005)Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Johnson, C. and Quin, M. Learning in science and discovery centres – appendix. In: Science Center Impact Study. Washington, DC: ASTC (2004)Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    GATE developer,
  47. 47.
    O. Corcho, M. Fernandez-Lopez, and Asuncion Gomez-Perez, “Methodologies, tools and languages for building ontologies. Where is their meeting point?,” Data & Knowledge Engineering, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 41-64, (2003)Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    F. Noy, and D. L. McGuinness, Ontology development 101: A guide to creating your first ontology, Stanford Medical Informatics (2001)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The National School of Computer Sciences of ManoubaManoubaTunisia
  2. 2.The Higher Institute of Applied Sciences and Technology of SousseSousseTunisia
  3. 3.The Faculty of Economic Sciences and Management of SfaxSfaxTunisia
  4. 4.The Prince Research Group, ISITComUniversity Of SousseSousseTunisia

Personalised recommendations