Advertisement

Care, Upbringing and Teaching in ‘Horizontal’ Transitions in Toddler Day-Care Groups

  • Niina RutanenEmail author
  • Maritta Hännikäinen
Chapter
Part of the Policy and Pedagogy with Under-three Year Olds: Cross-disciplinary Insights and Innovations book series (Policy pedagogy under-three year olds)

Abstract

This chapter focuses on the fundamental notion of early childhood education as an integrated whole, composed of care, upbringing and teaching, in the context of Finnish early childhood education. These three concepts – care, upbringing and teaching – are addressed firstly on the conceptual level, and then empirically by illustrative examples from day-care groups for one-to-three-year-old children.

Our main question focuses on how care, upbringing and teaching are implemented in small-scale ‘horizontal’ transitions children experience between events or activities during the day as part of the experience of day-care, and how these events might be evaluated from a pedagogical perspective. Empirical data of horizontal transitions were collected by observations and video recordings in three day-care groups. The illustrative examples selected and discussed are linked to everyday life transitions occurring in day-care centres.

Our analysis shows how horizontal transitions provide many opportunities to bring care, upbringing and teaching together into an integrated whole. The transitions are also important contexts for young children’s learning. The chapter gives examples of good educational practices for supporting children’s learning, development and well-being in day-care groups. Further, by raising awareness of less-known issues in early childhood education, it could offer pointers for teacher education and teachers’ professional development.

Keywords

Care Upbringing Teaching Transitions One-to-three-year-old children 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The data collection for this work was supported by the Academy of Finland, project (In)visible Toddlerhood? Global and Local Constructions of Toddlers’ Places in Institutions (SA no 133345) and the Academy of Finland project Emotional wellbeing of the younger children in day-care groups: participation, social relationships and teachers’ role in joint activities (SA no 136200).

References

  1. Ahnert, L., Gunnar, M. R., Lamb, M. E., & Barthel, M. (2004). Transition to child care: Associations with infant-mother attachment, infant negative emotion, and cortisol elevations. Child Development, 75(3), 639–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Broström, S. (2006). Care and education: Towards a new paradigm in early childhood education. Child & Youth Care Forum, 35, 391–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brownlee, J. M., Berthelsen, D. C., & Segaran, N. (2009). Childcare workers’ and centre directors’ beliefs about infant childcare quality and professional training. Early Child Development and Care, 179(4), 453–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dalli, C. (2002). From home to childcare centre: Challenges for mothers, teachers and children. In A.-W. Dunlop & H. Fabian (Eds.), Transitions in the early years (pp. 51–71). London: Routledge-Falmer.Google Scholar
  5. Dalli, C. (2012). A constant juggle for balance: A day in the life of a New Zealand kindergarten teacher. In L. Miller, C. Dalli, & M. Urban (Eds.), Early childhood grows up: Towards a critical ecology of the profession (pp. 87–101). Dordrecht/Heidelberg/London/New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Datler, W., Ereky-Stevens, K., Hover-Reisner, N., & Malmberg, L.-E. (2012). Toddlers’ transition to out-of-home day care: Settling into a new care environment. Infant Behavior & Development, 35(3), 439–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Diderichsen, A. (1997). Den professionelle omsorg og børns udvickling. Social Forskning, Marts, 1997, 18–27.Google Scholar
  8. Dunlop, A.-W., & Fabian, H. (Eds.). (2007). Informing transitions in the early years. Research, policy and practice. Berkshire: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Fumoto, H., Hargreaves, D. J., & Maxwell, S. (2004). The concept of teaching: A reappraisal. Early Years. An International Journal of Research and Development, 24(2), 179–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Goldstein, L. S. (1998). More than gentle smiles and warm hugs: Applying the ethic of care to early childhood education. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 12(2), 244–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Griebel, W., & Niesel, R. (2009). A developmental psychology perspective in Germany: Co-construction of transitions between family and education system by the child, parents and pedagogues. Early Years: An International Journal of Research and Development, 29(1), 59–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hännikäinen, M. (2013). Varhaiskasvatus pienten lasten ryhmissä: Hoitoa kasvatusta vai opetusta? In K. Karila & L. Lipponen (Eds.), Varhaiskasvatuksen pedagogiikka (pp. 30–52). Tampere: Vastapaino.Google Scholar
  13. Hännikäinen, M., & van Oers, B. (2002). Togetherness as a quality of the learning context. In M. Karlsson Lohmander (Ed.), Researching early childhood. Volume 4: Social competence and communication (pp. 83–96). Göteborg: Göteborg University.Google Scholar
  14. Jensen, A., Broström, S., & Hansen, O. H. (2010). Critical perspectives on Danish early childhood education and care: Between the technical and the political. Early Years. An International Journal of Research and Development, 30(3), 243–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kagan, S. L., & Neuman, M. J. (1998). Lessons from three decades of transition research. The Elementary School Journal, 98(4), 365–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lillemyr, O. F. (2009). Taking play seriously: Children and play in early childhood education. An exciting challenge. Charlotte: IAP, Information Age Publishing, INC.Google Scholar
  17. Løvlie, L. (1984). Det pedagogiske argument. Oslo: J. W. Cappelens Forlag.Google Scholar
  18. McNamee, A., & Mercurio, M. L. (2007). Who cares? How teachers can scaffold children’s ability to care: A case for picture books. ECRP. Spring 2007. Retrieved from http://ecrp.uiuc.edu/v9n1/mcnamee.html
  19. National Curriculum Guidelines on Early Childhood Education and Care in Finland. (2004). (orig. in Finnish 2003, rev. 2005). Helsinki: National Research and Development Institute for Welfare and Health. Retrieved from https://www.julkari.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/75535/267671cb-0ec0-4039-b97b-7ac6ce6b9c10.pdf?sequence=1
  20. Noddings, N. (1992). The challenge to care in schools. An alternative approach to education. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  21. Oxford Dictionaries Online. Retrieved from http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/
  22. Page, J. (2011). Do mothers want professional carers to love their babies? Journal of Early Childhood Research, 9(3), 310–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Page, J. (2014). Developing professional love in early childhood settings. In L. J. Harrison & J. Sumsion (Eds.), Lived spaces of infant-toddler education and care-exploring diverse perspectives on theory, research, practice and policy. International perspectives on early childhood education and development series (pp. 119–130). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  24. Rutanen, N. (in press). Spatial perspective on everyday transitions within a toddler group care setting. In L. Li, G. Quinones, & A. Ridgway (Eds.), Studying babies and toddlers: Cultural worlds and transitory relationships. Singapore: Springer.Google Scholar
  25. Seung Lam, M., & Pollard, A. (2006). A conceptual framework for understanding children as agents in the transition from home to kindergarten. Early Years, An International Journal of Research and Development, 26(2), 123–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Taggart, G. (2011). “Don’t we care?” The ethics and emotional labour of early years professionalism. Early Years. An International Journal of Research and Development, 31(1), 85–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Thyssen, S. (1995). Care for children in day care centers. Child & Youth Care Forum, 24, 91–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. van de Pol, J., Volman, M., & Beishuizen, J. (2010). Scaffolding in teacher–Student interaction: A decade of research. Educational Psychology Review, 22(3), 271–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. van Oers, B. (1996). Are you sure? Stimulating mathematical thinking during young children’s play. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 2(1), 19–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Vogler, P., Crivello, G., & Woodhead, M. (2008). Early childhood transitions research: A review of concepts, theory, and practice. Working Paper 48. Bernard van Leer Foundation. Retrieved from http://oro.open.ac.uk/16989/1/

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of EducationUniversity of JyväskyläJyväskyläFinland

Personalised recommendations