Advertisement

Influences on U.S. Higher Education Programs Educating the Infant-Toddler Workforce

  • Rachel Chazan-CohenEmail author
  • Claire Vallotton
  • Tamesha Harewood
  • Martha Buell
Chapter
Part of the Policy and Pedagogy with Under-three Year Olds: Cross-disciplinary Insights and Innovations book series (Policy pedagogy under-three year olds)

Abstract

In this paper we introduce the Collaborative for Understanding the Pedagogy of Infant/toddler Development (CUPID), a multi-disciplinary group of more than 50 scholars across 28 U.S. colleges and universities who have joined together in a Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SOTL) effort to understand how to better support the professional needs of the infant/toddler workforce. One of the goals of CUPID is to make visible key issues faced by institutions of higher education (IHEs) in the U.S. in addressing the training of the infant/toddler workforce. Challenges facing those in higher education include the U.S. policy context, and the federal and state structures for supporting and credentialing the infant/toddler workforce. This work is made more challenging by the historical context of the field, and by the changing views on the goals for early care and education including the call for increased educational qualifications for teachers.

Because of the growing recognition of the importance of the first 3 years as a distinct developmental period characterized by rapid brain development and the potential to promote long-term child well-being, many nations are increasingly concerned about the training and education of the infant/toddler workforce. There are many pathways to professionalization of the workforce, including pre-service and in-service credentialing and professional development activities (Institute of Medicine (IOM), National Research Council (NRC) (2015) Transforming the workforce for children birth through age 8: a unifying foundation. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC). In this chapter we focus on one pathway: obtaining a post-secondary bachelors degree. Specifically, we outline key issues faced by institutions of higher education (IHEs) in the U.S. in addressing the development of the infant/toddler workforce (In this chapter we define infants/toddlers as children from birth to 36 months, as is commonly done in the U.S. We refer to the individuals working with this age group as teachers, or as members of the workforce). In this chapter we describe the U.S. policy context, starting with an international perspective, then focusing on U.S. federal and state structures for credentialing the infant/toddler workforce, as well as national policies and programs that influence the approaches of IHEs to preparing this teaching workforce.

Keywords

Child Care Early Childhood Education Head Start Early Education Early Childhood Program 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Administration for Children and Families. (2015). The faces of early head start: A national picture of early head start programs and the children and families they serve (OPRE report #2015-29). Washington, DC: Office of Planning, Research, and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.Google Scholar
  2. Bornfreund, L. A. (2011). Getting in sync: Revamping licensing and preparation for teachers in pre-K, kindergarten, and the early grades. Washington, DC: New America Foundation. Retrieved from http://newamerica.net/publications/policy/getting_in_sync
  3. Campell, P. H., & Milbourne, S. A. (2005). Improving the quality of infant-toddler care through professional development. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 25(1), 3–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cassidy, D. I., Buell, M. I., Pugh-Hoese, S., & Russell, S. (1995). The effects of education on child care teachers’ beliefs and classroom quality: Year one evaluation of the TEACH early childhood associate degree scholarship program. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 10(2), 171–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fagan, P. F. (2001). How U.N. conventions on women’s and children’s rights undermine family, religion, and sovereignty. The heritage foundation backgrounder: Executive summary, N. 1407. Washington, DC.: The Heritage Foundation.Google Scholar
  6. Institute of Medicine (IOM), & National Research Council (NRC). (2015). Transforming the workforce for children birth through age 8: A unifying foundation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  7. Mayoral, M. V. (2013). Supporting babies through QRIS: Inclusion of infant toddler quality standards. Washington, DC: Zero To Three.Google Scholar
  8. National Survey of Early Care and Education Project Team. (2013). Number and characteristics of early care and education (ECE) teachers and caregivers: Initial findings from the National Survey of Early Care and Education (NSECE) (OPRE report #2013-38). Washington, DC: Office of Planning, Research, and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, Department of Health and Human Services.Google Scholar
  9. Nolan, M. (2007). Mentor coaching and leadership in early care and education. Belmont: Wadsworth Pub Co.Google Scholar
  10. OECD. (2014a). Indicator C2: How do early childhood education systems differ around the world? Education at a Glance 2014: OECD Indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/888933118333
  11. OECD. (2014b). Indicator D6: What does it take to become a teacher? Education at a Glance 2014: OECD Indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  12. Public Law 110-134. (2007, December 12). Improving Head Start for School Readiness Act of 2007.Google Scholar
  13. Rutkow, L., & Lozman, J. T. (2006). Suffer the children?: A call for United States ratification of the United Nations convention on the rights of the child. Harvard Human Rights Review, 19, 161–190.Google Scholar
  14. Technical Assistance Coordination Center. (2011). Data accountability report: Child count 2011. Accessed 15 Oct 2015. http://tadnet.public.tadnet.org/pages/712
  15. Thornton, A., & Young-DeMarco, L. (2001). Four decades of trends in attitudes toward family issues in the United States: The 1960’s through the 1990’s. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63, 1009–1037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. United States Child Care Bureau. (2007). Credentials for the Infant/Toddler child care workforce: A technical assistance tool for child care and development fund administrators. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families, Office of Family Assistance, Child Care Bureau. Retrieved from http://www.zerotothree.org/public-policy/state-community-policy/nitcci/credentials-for-the-infant-toddler-child-care-workforce.pdf
  17. Watson, J. (2012). Starting well: Benchmarking early education across the world. A report by the Economist Intelligence Unit: Lien Foundation. Retrieved from http://www.economistinsights.com/leadership-talent-innovation/analysis/starting-well/fullreport
  18. Zero to Three (2016). Credentials for the infant/ toddler child care workforce. Retrieved from https://www.zerotothree.org/resources/470-infant-and-toddler-credential-fact-sheet

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rachel Chazan-Cohen
    • 1
    Email author
  • Claire Vallotton
    • 2
  • Tamesha Harewood
    • 2
  • Martha Buell
    • 3
  1. 1.Collge of Eduction and Human DevelopmentUniversity of Massachusetts BostonBostonUSA
  2. 2.Department of Human Development and Family StudiesMichigan State UniversityEast LansingUSA
  3. 3.University of DelawareNewarkUSA

Personalised recommendations