The Value of English Literary Studies in Hong Kong: Insights from Interviews with MA Students

Part of the The Humanities in Asia book series (HIA, volume 2)


This chapter uses interviews with eight mature students in full-time employment who voluntarily took up a self-paid part-time master’s course in English literary studies in order to rethink the question of the value of the humanities for Hong Kong from the perspective of the students themselves. These students were not under the common social pressure in Hong Kong to obtain a first undergraduate degree for better future career options, having already received one, and their responses could therefore be a better measure of the value of humanities studies in Hong Kong beyond this reason. The chapter shows that despite obvious relevance to students’ careers emerging from the interviews, half of the respondents maintained a deliberate distance from such pragmatic reasons, elevating the personal meaning of the subject above all else. The chapter thus warns against diminishing this personal aspect in positioning humanities programmes in favour of highlighting career pragmatism in the face of market pressures. The expected finding of personal interest was also explored in greater depth by the method of “transformative interviewing,” whereby the interview was treated as an educational experience and students were challenged to think of social uses for their studies. The responses that emerged indicated that the anti-pragmatism of English literary studies in Hong Kong lead precisely to its relevance and use in society as a valuable resource that could counter pervasive commercialism and materialism, not least in its educational sector. Chan thus argues for a renewed, instead of oppositional, understanding of the “pragmatics” of humanities studies, which programmes can use to position themselves in Hong Kong. The success in the reconfiguration of the value of a literary studies degree in the process of the interview, Chan suggests, can be replicated by adding a metatextual, self-reflexive dimension to the humanities classroom, through which students are challenged to think more deeply about the values of their studies without threatening the integrity of the subject.


English Literature Literary Study Personal Interest Literary World Literary Work 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



The author is grateful to Irene Chan for helping her with the interview transcription work for this chapter, and to both her and Jenny Kwok for conducting literature reviews of research on the humanities in higher education. The author’s special thanks go to the MA students who agreed to be interviewed, and who therefore made this chapter possible.


  1. Aspirations for the higher education system in Hong Kong: Report of the university grants committee. 2010. Hong Kong: University Grants Committee, December 2010.
  2. Wan, Calvin. 2011. Reforming higher education in Hong Kong towards post-massification: The first decade and challenges ahead. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 33(2): 115–129.Google Scholar
  3. Chan, Elaine. 2002. Beyond pedagogy: Language and identity in post-colonial Hong Kong. British Journal of Sociology of Education 23(2): 271–285. doi: 10.1080/01425690220137756.Google Scholar
  4. Cheng, Yin Cheong, Alan Chi Keung Cheung, and Timothy Wai Wa Yuen. 2016. Developing Hong Kong as a regional education hub: functions, modes, and requirements. In Internationalization of higher education: The case of Hong Kong, ed. Yin Cheong Cheng, Alan Chi Keung Cheung, and Shun Wing Ng, 21‒42. Singapore: Springer.Google Scholar
  5. Christie, Stuart. 2016. Literature minus the local: Assessing the viability of a taught postgraduate program in literary studies in contemporary Hong Kong. In The future of English in Asia: Perspectives on language and literature, ed. Michael O’Sullivan, David Huddart, and Carmen Lee, 140–158. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Evans, Stephen. 2013. The long march to biliteracy and trilingualism: Language policy in Hong Kong education since the handover. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 33: 302–324.Google Scholar
  7. Hong Kong Annual Digest of Statistics. 2013. Hong Kong: Census and Statistics Department, 2013.
  8. Hong Kong Annual Digest of Statistics. 2014. Hong Kong: Census and Statistics Department, 2014.
  9. Hong Kong Annual Digest of Statistics. 2015. Hong Kong: Census and Statistics Department, 2015.
  10. Jay, Paul. 2014. The humanities “crisis” and the future of literary studies. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan, Springer.Google Scholar
  11. Kidd, David Comer, and Emanuele Castano. 2013. Reading literary fiction improves theory of mind. Science 342(6156): 377‒80. Scholar
  12. King, Nigel and Horrocks, Christine. 2010. Interviews in qualitative research. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  13. Law, Wing Sang. 2009. Collaborative colonial power: The making of the Hong Kong Chinese. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Leung, Christy. 2015. Hong Kong graduates earn just HK$1,800 more than their predecessors 20 years ago, SCMP, 8 Sept 2015.
  15. Mar, Raymond A., Keith Oatley, and Jordan B. Peterson. 2009. Exploring the link between reading fiction and empathy: Ruling out individual differences and examining outcomes. Communications 34(4): 407–428.
  16. Mok, Ka Ho, and Peter Bodycott. “Hong Kong: the quest for regional education hub status.” In International education hubs: Student, talent, knowledge-innovation models, ed. Jane Knight, 81‒100. Dordrecht: Springer, 2014.Google Scholar
  17. Nussbaum, Martha C. 2010. Not for profit: Why democracy needs the humanities. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Poon, Anita Y.K. 2013. Will the new fine-tuning medium-of-instruction policy alleviate the threats of dominance of english-medium instruction in Hong Kong? Current Issues in Language Planning 14(1): 34‒51. Scholar
  19. Rogers, Kate. 2012. Chinese literature in English: A vital tool for engaging Hong Kong associate degree students. In Language arts in Asia: Literature and drama in English, Putonghua and Cantonese, ed. Christina DeCoursey. Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
  20. Roulston, Kathryn. 2010. Reflective interviewing: A guide to theory and practice. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  21. Siu, Phila. 2015. Salaries of Hong Kong’s University graduates dropped 20 per cent in last 20 years, Study finds. SCMP, July 29, 2015.
  22. Statistics on students in higher education institutions funded through the University Grants Committee. Hong Kong Monthly Digest of Statistics, August 2014.
  23. Tang, Hei-tang Hayes. 2015. Democratizing higher education in China’s Hong Kong: Between rhetoric and reality. In Democratizing higher education: International comparative perspectives, ed. Patrick Blessinger and John P. Anchan, 155‒168. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Trent, John, Xuesong Gao, and Mingyue Gu. 2014. Introduction. In Language teacher education in a multilingual context: Experiences from Hong Kong, ed. John Trent, Xuesong Gao, and Mingyue Gu, 1–12. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  25. Tsang, Michael Yat Him. 2016. In dialogue: Contesting the politics of globalization in Hong Kong literature in English. In The future of English in Asia: Perspectives on language and literature, ed. Michael O’Sullivan, David Huddart, and Carmen Lee, 173–189. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Chinese University of Hong KongHong KongHong Kong

Personalised recommendations