Skip to main content

Formation of Ash Aerosols and Ash Deposits of Coal Blends

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Clean Coal Technology and Sustainable Development (ISCC 2015)

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Many coal-fired power plants now burn coal blends instead of a single raw coal because of required low sulfur attainment levels. Mineral matter for the coal blends is likely to be different from that for their parent coals and is unlikely to be predictable from simple averaging rules. The problem is important because deposit buildup alters the characteristics of heat transfer and pollutant emissions of the boiler. In this work, experiments were conducted on a 100-kW rated pilot-scale down-fired self-sustained combustor, firing an Illinois coal, a Powder River Basin (PRB) coal, and a 60 % Illinois/40 % PRB coal blend. Such a 60/40 % blend had been planned for the FutureGen 2.0 project. Air combustion as well as oxy-coal combustion with recycled flue gas (RFG) was investigated. The intent was not only to test how deposit was formed from coal blend but also to relate the size-segregated composition of the ash aerosol to the spatially resolved composition within the deposits. To this end, a Berner low-pressure impactor (BLPI), a scanning mobility particle sizer (SMPS), and an aerodynamic particle sizer (APS) were utilized to acquire size-segregated ash aerosol samples and to measure particle size distribution (PSD). A novel surface temperature-controlled ash deposition probe system was used for fouling deposits collection. The results from air combustion show that PSDs measured by BLPI and SMPS/APS agree well with each other. Combustion of Illinois coal will likely produce more ultrafine particles compared to PRB coal. However, combustion of Illinois-PRB blended coal could somewhat reduce the formation of these ultrafine particles. Aerosols from combustion of Illinois coal have higher Si and Al, and corresponding lower Ca, Mg, S, and Na compared to those from combustion of PRB coal. The elemental concentrations in aerosols from combustion of blended coal lie between those of the parent coals. Comparing to PRB coal, the inside deposits from combustion of Illinois coal have higher Al, K, Fe, and Si, while lower S, Ca, Na, and Mg, which is consistent with the trends of ash aerosol composition measurements. This agrees with our previous theory that vaporization mode ash aerosols are the main contributor to build up inside layer deposits, and their composition depends on coal composition. Blended coal increased S retention in ash due to higher alkaline earth metal (AAEM, especially Ca) concentration in PRB coal. Deposits of the blend do not obey simple averaging rules for the two components of the blend, which is not surprising given that in order to understand mechanisms of deposit formation, one must have access to both the size-segregated composition of the ash aerosol and the spatially resolved composition of the deposits.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Raask E (1985) Mineral impurities in coal combustion: behavior, problems, and remedial measures. Hemisphere Publishing Corporation, New York

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bryers RW (1996) Prog Energy Combust Sci 22:29–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Xu M, Yu D, Yao H, Liu X, Qiao Y (2011) Proc Combust Inst 33:1681–1697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wang Q, Zhang L, Sato A, Ninomiya Y, Yamashita T (2008) Fuel 87:2997–3005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wang Q, Zhang L, Sato A, Ninomiya Y, Yamashita T (2009) Fuel 88:150–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhou K, Xu M, Yu D, Wen C, Zhan Z, Yao H (2010) Chin Sci Bull 55:3448–3455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhang J (2010) PhD thesis, University of Utah

    Google Scholar 

  8. Zhan Z, Fry A, Zhang Y, Wendt JOL (2014) Proc Combust Inst

    Google Scholar 

  9. Morris WJ (2011) PhD thesis, University of Utah

    Google Scholar 

  10. Zhan Z, Fry A, Zhang Y, Wendt JOL (2015) Proc Combust Inst 35:2373–2380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Linak WP, Miller CA, Seames WS, Wendt JOL, Ishinomori T, Endo Y, Miyamae S (2002) Proc Combust Inst 29:441–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the support from the Illinois Clean Coal Institute and State of Wyoming under the Clean Coal Research Program and National Science Foundation of China (No. 51376061). We also acknowledge Praxair Inc., for contributing the O2 and CO2 supply and thank Chris Coulter, Mbonisi Sibanda, and Brian van Devener from the University of Utah for their help in experiments and analysis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jost O. L. Wendt .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore and Tsinghua University Press

About this paper

Cite this paper

Zhan, Z., Tian, S., Fry, A.R., Wendt, J.O.L. (2016). Formation of Ash Aerosols and Ash Deposits of Coal Blends. In: Yue, G., Li, S. (eds) Clean Coal Technology and Sustainable Development. ISCC 2015. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2023-0_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2023-0_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-2022-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-2023-0

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics