Advertisement

Reinventing Clinical Legal Education: Taiwanese Adaptation of an American Model

  • Serge A. MartinezEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Economics, Law, and Institutions in Asia Pacific book series (ELIAP)

Abstract

The clinical legal education movement began in earnest in the United States in the 1960s in response to student demands that their legal education serve marginalized communities. As clinical legal education became a mainstream element of American legal education, the focus moved from its service-based roots to an emphasis on education, particularly practical lawyering skills and professional values for lawyers. Law clinics in the United States have developed a standard model that works to achieve these objectives within the framework of the American legal system. The global spread of clinical legal education originated in the United States and has led to clinical programs around the world. The most successful exports are tailored to the local context. It is the concept of clinical legal education that travels best, not any particular model. Taiwan’s legal educators have resisted clinical education for a very long time, and there are several practical obstacles to implementing an American-style clinic. However, some existing models that have been created within the existing system would require only slight modification to be viable options for clinical education in Taiwan. The inchoate clinical movement in Taiwan will continue moving forward by developing models that, while reflecting the core objectives and concepts of the global clinical legal education movement, are absolutely Taiwanese.

Keywords

Clinical education Taiwan Taiwanese Legal Education 

References

  1. Abramson K (2006) Paradigms in the cultivation of China’s future legal elite: a case study of legal education in Western China. Asian Pac Law Policy J 7:302–384Google Scholar
  2. Aiken J, Wizner S (2004) Teaching and doing: the role of law school clinics in enhancing access to justice. Fordham Law J 73:997–1011Google Scholar
  3. Bloch FS (2008) Access to justice and the global clinical movement. J Law Policy 28:111–139Google Scholar
  4. Center for the Study of Applied Legal Education (2015) 2013–2014 survey. http://www.csale.org/files/report_on_2013-14_csale_survey.pdf. Accessed 29 Feb 2016
  5. Chang W-C (2010) Public interest litigation in Taiwan: strategy for law and policy changes in the course of democratization. In: Yap PJ, Lau H (eds) Public interest litigation in Asia. Routledge, New York, pp 136–160Google Scholar
  6. Chen TC (2015) Clinical education in Taiwanese law schools. In: Sarker S (ed) Clinical legal education in Asia: accessing justice for the underprivileged. Palgrave Macmillan, New York, pp 75–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Council on Legal Education for Professional Responsibility (1969) Clinical legal education in the law school curriculum. Council on Legal Education for Professional Responsibility, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Dowdle MW (2000) Preserving indigenous paradigms in an age of globalization: pragmatic strategies for the development of clinical legal aid in China. Fordham Int Law J 24:S56–S82Google Scholar
  9. Dubin J (1998) Clinical design for social justice imperatives. SMU Law Rev 51:1461–1507Google Scholar
  10. Hamoudi H (2005) Toward a rule of law society in Iraq: introducing clinical legal education into Iraqi Law Schools. Berkeley J Int Law 23:112–137Google Scholar
  11. Joy PA (2004) The ethics of law school clinic students as student-lawyers. South Texas Law J 45:815–842Google Scholar
  12. Kotkin MJ (1989) Reconsidering role assumption in clinical education. New Mexico Law Rev 19:185–202Google Scholar
  13. Lo C-f (2006) Driving an ox cart to catch up with the space shuttle: the need for and prospects of legal education reform in Taiwan. Wis Int Law J 24:41–84Google Scholar
  14. Martinez S (2012) Law clinics in Taiwan: can clinical legal education succeed in this civil law jurisdiction with an undergraduate legal education system? NTU Law Rev 7:343–384Google Scholar
  15. National Archive of Clinical Legal Education (2000) Transcription of oral history interview with Elliot Milstein. http://lib.law.cua.edu/nacle/transcripts/milstein.pdf. Accessed 29 Feb 2016
  16. National Chengchi University College of Law (2016) Student legal services. http://www.law.nccu.edu.tw/service/super_pages.php?ID=service1. Accessed 29 Feb 2016
  17. Ogilvy S (2012) Compilation of clinical law teachers with international teaching of consulting experience. http://www.law.edu/res/docs/international_teaching_survey_rev08-23-12.pdf. Accessed 29 Feb 2016
  18. Packer HL, Ehrlich T (1972) New directions in legal education. McGraw Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. Phan PN (2005) Clinical legal education in China: in pursuit of a culture of law and a mission of social justice. Yale Hum Rights Dev Law J 8:117–152Google Scholar
  20. Qafisheh M (2015) Clinical legal education in Palestine: a clinical case under military occupation. In: Sarker S (ed) Clinical legal education in Asia: accessing justice for the underprivileged. Palgrave Macmillan, New York, pp 113–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rekosh E (2008) Constructing public interest law: transnational collaboration and exchange in Central and Eastern Europe. UCLA J Int Law Foreign Aff 13:55–95Google Scholar
  22. Sandefur R, Selbin J (2009) The clinic effect. Clin Law Rev 16:57–107Google Scholar
  23. Wilson R (2001) Three law school clinics in Chile, 1970–2000: innovation, resistance and conformity in the Global South. Clin Law Rev 8:515–582Google Scholar
  24. Wilson R (2004) Training for justice: the global reach of clinical legal education. Penn State Int Law Rev 22:421–431Google Scholar
  25. Wilson M (2015) Legal clinical education in Japan: a work in progress. In: Sarker S (ed) Clinical legal education in Asia: accessing justice for the underprivileged. Palgrave Macmillan, New York, pp 195–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wortham L (2006) Aiding clinical education abroad: what can be gained and the learning curve on how to do so effectively. Clin Law Rev 12:615–686Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of New Mexico School of LawAlbuquerqueUSA

Personalised recommendations