Advertisement

Coordinating Matrimonial Property Regimes Across National Borders: Israeli and Comparative Perspectives

  • Talia EinhornEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Economics, Law, and Institutions in Asia Pacific book series (ELIAP)

Abstract

Recent decades have witnessed a remarkable increase in the mobility of persons across national borders, as well as an increase in the number of couples formed by nationals of different countries, who may live in a country of which neither is national and acquire property in more than one country. Such couples may face uncertainty regarding the legal rules governing the spouses’ rights in the matrimonial property. The matrimonial property regime may also change following a change of domicile. The problems encountered are due to the fact that states apply different substantive legal rules, as well as different conflict rules, to such property relations. This study, dedicated to Grand Justice Professor Herbert Han-Pao Ma, a great teacher and dear friend, first examines the various matrimonial property regimes provided by law in some European civil law countries, as well as the legal rules governing matrimonial property in England and in Israel (part 2); it then considers, with respect to both the conflict rules designating the law governing matrimonial property and the substantive rules that would be applied in each jurisdiction, respectively, a Swiss-Israeli case (part 3), a Dutch-Israeli case (part 4), and an English-Israeli case (part 5), followed by conclusions (part 6).

Keywords

Matrimonial property Family law Private international law International jurisdiction Israeli law EU law Comparative law 

References

  1. Boele-Woelki K, Braat B, Curry-Sumner I (eds) (2009) European family law in action. Intersentia, AntwerpenGoogle Scholar
  2. Boele-Woelki K, Ferrand F, González-Beilfuss C, Jänterä-Jareborg M, Lowe N, Martiny D, Pintens W (2013) Principles of European family law regarding property relations between spouses. Intersentia, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  3. Bucher A, Tschanz P-Y (1995) Private international law and arbitration – basic documents. Helbing & Lichtenhahn, BasleGoogle Scholar
  4. Einhorn T (2012) Private international law in Israel, 2nd edn. Kluwer Law International, Alphen aan den RijnGoogle Scholar
  5. Einhorn T (2015/3) Coordinating the “global” jurisdiction of Israeli courts in matters of family law and succession with the rules on recognition and enforcement of judgements. Wealth Management Law Rev 1(3):71–77 (in Hebrew)Google Scholar
  6. Fassberg CW (2000) Law and justice in choice of law: matrimonial property after Nafisi v Nafisi. Mishpatim 31:97–144 (in Hebrew)Google Scholar
  7. Friedmann D (1977) Matrimonial property in Israel. RabelsZ 41:112–150Google Scholar
  8. Lowe N, Douglas G (2015) Bromley’s family law, 7th edn. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Probert R, Harding M (2015) Cretney and Probert’s family law, 9th edn. Sweet & Maxwell, LondonGoogle Scholar
  10. Schuz R (2001) Choice of law in relation to matrimonial property: the existing law and proposals for reform. Bar-Ilan Law Stud 16:425–470 (in Hebrew)Google Scholar
  11. Shalem N (2013) Property relations between spouses – theory and practice. Ramat-Gan (in Hebrew)Google Scholar
  12. Shifman P (1996) Nevertheless: community of property. Mishpatim 26:399–408 (in Hebrew)Google Scholar
  13. Siehr K (2005) General problems of private international law in modern codifications – de lege lata and de lege europea ferenda. Yearb Priv Int Law VII:17–62Google Scholar
  14. Siehr K (2014) Global jurisdiction of local courts and recognition of their judgments abroad. In: Mankowski P, Wurmnest W (eds) Festschrift für Ulrich Magnus zum 70. Geburtstag. Beck, München, pp 515–529Google Scholar
  15. The Law Commission (2013) Matrimonial property impact assessment. http://www.lawcom.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/lc343_matrimonial_property_impact-assessment.pdf. Accessed 4 Sept 2016
  16. Warendorf H, Thomas R, Curry Sumner I (2009) The Civil Code of the Netherlands. Kluwer Law International, Alphen aan den RijnGoogle Scholar
  17. Weisman J (1997) Law of property – ownership and concurrent ownership, vol 2. Sacher Institute, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem (in Hebrew)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Economics and Business ManagementAriel UniversityArielIsrael
  2. 2.Faculty of ManagementTel Aviv UniversityTel Aviv-YafoIsrael

Personalised recommendations