Creating Shared Encounters Through Fixed and Movable Interfaces

  • Patrick Tobias Fischer
  • Eva Hornecker
Part of the Gaming Media and Social Effects book series (GMSE)


Currently, our cities become more and more equipped with information and communications technology (ICT). Rarely do these systems provide a fit with everyday public life. They focus primarily on efficiency, security, safety and business. There are few system designs which support social aspects such as identification with the city and community, responsibility, everyday habits, leisure, pleasurable stay, social interaction, courtesy behaviour, play, etc.—in short, aspects of social sustainability. To outfit our future city with technology currently lacking the support of those qualities, we created several novel interaction designs to explore how to best merge ICT with the public space. This chapter presents some of our theory developed from our research-through-design approach and three case studies including suggestions for measures of success such as the number of shared encounters, average interactions per minute (ipm), or accumulated interaction time. We believe those hard facts are needed to argue for the need of playful ICT in our city that makes our public life more enjoyable.


Urban HCI Humane city Tangible and embodied interaction Research through design in-the-wild Prototyping 


  1. Baggini, J.: Playable cities: the city that plays together, stays together. The Guardian, 4 Sept 2014. (seen 14 Sept 2014)
  2. Brown, S., Vaughan, C.: Play: How it Shapes the Brain, Opens the Imagination, and Invigorates the Soul. Avery, New York (2009)Google Scholar
  3. Burnham, S.: Urban play: an introduction. In: Burnham, S. (ed.) Droog Event 2. Urban Play. Droog Publisher, Amsterdam, pp. 8–11 (2008)Google Scholar
  4. Daalsgard, P., Halskov, K. (2010). Designing urban media façades: cases and challenges. In: Proceedings of CHI’10, pp. 2277–2286. ACM (2010)Google Scholar
  5. de Souza e Silva, A., Hjorth, L.: Playful urban spaces. A Historical Approach to Mobile Games. Simulation and Gaming, vol. 40, no. 5. pp. 602–625 (2009)Google Scholar
  6. Fischer, P.T., Hornecker, E.: Urban HCI: Spatial aspects in the design of shared encounters for media façades. In: Proceedings of ACM CHI’ 2012, pp. 307–316Google Scholar
  7. Fischer, P.T., Zöllner, C., Hornecker, E.: VR/Urban: Spread.gun—design process and challenges in developing a shared encounter for media façades. In: Proceedings of British HCI 2010, BCS eWiC series, pp. 289–298. British Computer Society/ACM NYGoogle Scholar
  8. Fischer, P.T., et al.: Movable, kick-/flickable light fragments eliciting ad-hoc interaction in public space. In: Proceedings of PerDis’14, The third international symposium on pervasive displays, p. 50. ACM NY (2014)Google Scholar
  9. Fischer, P.T., et al.: Castle-sized interfaces: an interactive façade mapping. In: Proceedings of Pervasive Displays 2015 (PerDis’15), pp. 91–97, ACM NY (2015)Google Scholar
  10. Goffman, E.: Behaviour in Public Places. The Free Press, New York (1966)Google Scholar
  11. Graffiti Research Lab: Last accessed: 2012Google Scholar
  12. Greenfield, A.: Against the Smart City. Do Publications, New York (2013)Google Scholar
  13. Hornecker, E., Buur, J.: Getting a grip on tangible interaction: a framework on physical space and social interaction. In: Proceedings of CHI 2006, pp. 437–446. ACM Press, NY (2006)Google Scholar
  14. Hornecker, E., Stifter, M.: Learning from interactive museum installations about interaction design for public settings. In: Proceedings of OzCHI 2006, pp. 135–142. ACM, NY (2006)Google Scholar
  15. Huizinga, J.: Homo Ludens: A Study of the Play-Element in Culture. Beacon Press, Boston (1955)Google Scholar
  16. Kendon, A.: Spacing and orientation in co-present interaction. In: Proceedings of COST 202 Training School, pp. 1–15. Springer, Heidelberg, (2009)Google Scholar
  17. Lefebvre, H.: The Production of Space. Wiley, New York (1991)Google Scholar
  18. Linn, S., et al.: Discursive architecture: integrating buildings, displays and text. In: Proceedings of CHI 2011Google Scholar
  19. Marshall, P., et al.: Using F-formations to analyse spatial patterns of interaction in physical environments. In: Proceedings of CSCW, pp. 445–454. ACM (2011)Google Scholar
  20. Michelis, D., Müller, J.: The audience funnel: Observations of gesture based interaction with multiple large displays in a City Center. Int. J. Hum.–Comput. Interact. 27(6), 562–579 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Milgram, S.: The Familiar Stranger: An Aspect of Urban Anonymity. In Milgram, S. (Ed.), The Individual in a Social World (pp. 51–53). Moston, MA: Addison Wesley, 1977Google Scholar
  22. Montola, M., Stenros, J., Waern, A.: Pervasive Games. Theory and Design. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, USA (2009)Google Scholar
  23. Mueller, J., et al.: Looking glass: a field study on noticing interactivity of shop windows. In: Proceedings of CHI’12, pp. 297–306. ACM (2012)Google Scholar
  24. Poole, S.: The truth about smart cities: ‘in the end, they will destroy democracy’. The Guardian, Wed. 17 Dec 2014. (seen 30 Dec 2015)
  25. Schieck, A.F., et al.: Exploring digital encounters in the public arena. In: Willis, K.S., et al. (eds.) Shared Encounters, pp. 179–195. Springer, London (2010)Google Scholar
  26. Schroeter, R.: Engaging new digital locals with interactive urban screens to collaboratively improve the city. In: Proceedings of CSCW’ 12, pp. 227–236. ACM (2012)Google Scholar
  27. Seitinger, S., et al.: Light bodies: exploring interactions with responsive lights. In: Proceedings of TEI, pp. 113–120. ACM (2010)Google Scholar
  28. Seitinger, S., et al.: Urban pixels: painting the city with light. In: Proceedings of CHI, pp. 839–848. ACM (2009)Google Scholar
  29. Sheridan, J.G., et al.: Understanding interaction in ubiquitous guerilla performances in playful arenas. In: People and Computers, pp. 3–18 (2005)Google Scholar
  30. Thackara, J.: In the Bubble. Designing in a Complex World. The MIT Press, Cambridge Mass (2005)Google Scholar
  31. Whyte, W.H.: City: Rediscovering the Center. Anchor, USA (1990)Google Scholar
  32. Willis, K.S., et al.: Shared encounters. In K.S. Willis, et al. (eds.) Shared Encounters, pp. 1–15. Springer, Berlin (2010)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Bauhaus-Universität, WeimarWeimarGermany

Personalised recommendations