Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 502))

Abstract

Interactive learning is an important source of competitive advantage. Consisting of innovative enterprises, universities, research institutes, etc., innovation network has become an important carrier of interactive learning. As a binder of relationships among innovation organizations, the level of trust determines the operational performance of the innovation network. This paper discusses the interactive learning and evolution of mutual trust within the innovation network, as well as the “symbiotic” interaction between them, which has important influence on the knowledge transfer efficiency and operational performance of the innovation network. Moreover, game theory is applied to analyze the building process of mutual trust under different conditions, and then the conditional inequalities needed to be met are deduced in this paper. Finally, this paper proposes three managerial enlightenments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Herstad SJ, Aslesen HW, Ebersberger B (2014) On industrial knowledge bases, commercial opportunities and global innovation network linkages. Res Policy 43(3):495–504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Howard M, Steensma HK et al (2015) Learning to collaborate through collaboration: How allying with expert firms influences collaborative innovation within novice firms. Strateg Manag J. doi:10.1002/smj.2424

  3. Lundvall BÅ (2010) National systems of innovation: toward a theory of innovation and interactive learning, vol 2. Anthem Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  4. Liu CC, Wang KC (2015) U.S. Patent No. 20,150,286,958. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fritsch M, Franke G (2004) Innovation, regional knowledge spillovers and r&d cooperation. Res Policy 33(2):245–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lan W, Zhangliu W (2012) Research on interactive learning, knowledge sharing andcollective innovation in smes cluster. Int J Innov Manag Technol 3(1):24

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wang T, Gu X (2011) Analysis on the establishing process of mutual trust among knowledge network members. J Intell 4(30):102–106

    Google Scholar 

  8. Luhman N (1979) Trust and power: two works by Niklas Luhmann. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ring PS, Van de Ven AH (1994) Developmental processes of cooperative interorganizational relationships. Acad Manag Rev 19(1):90–118

    Google Scholar 

  10. Zhou M, Zhao XP, Si X (2009) An empirical study of relation between intra-team networks centrality, networks quality and knowledge transfer success. Stud Sci Sci 9:017

    Google Scholar 

  11. Li W, Qiu S (2007) Characteristics of the network organizations and their effects on the boost of organizational learning. Sci Res Manag 6(28):175–181

    Google Scholar 

  12. DiBella AJ, Nevis EC, Gould JM (1996) Understanding organizational learning capability. J Manag Stud 33(3):361–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Tödtling F, Kaufmann A (2002) Smes in regional innovation systems and the role of innovation support-the case of upper Austria. J Technol Transf 27(1):15–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wu S (2010) Inter-organizational technology learning in knowledge chain: the analysis based on social network and social capital. Libr Inf Serv 14(54):92–96

    Google Scholar 

  15. Dyer JH (1996) Specialized supplier networks as a source of competitive advantage: evidence from the auto industry. Strateg Manag J 17(4):271–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sitkin SB, Roth NL (1993) Explaining the limited effectiveness of legalistic “remedies” for trust/distrust. Organ Sci 4(3):367–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Dirks KT, Ferrin DL (2001) The role of trust in organizational settings. Organ Sci 12(4):450–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Barney JB, Hansen MH (1994) Trustworthiness as a source of competitive advantage. Strateg Manag J 15(S1):175–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gulati R (1998) Alliances and networks. Strateg Manag J 4(19):293–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Inkpen AC, Tsang EW (2005) Social capital, networks, and knowledge transfer. Acad Manag Rev 30(1):146–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Dyer JH, Nobeoka K (2002) Creating and managing a high-performance knowledge-sharing network: the toyota case. Strateg Manag J 21(3):345–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kale P, Singh H, Perlmutter H (2000) Learning and protection of proprietary assets in strategic alliances: building relational capital. Strateg Manag J 21(3):217–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Oliver W (1985) The economic institutions of capitalism. Antitrust Bulletin

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (71571126), Western Project of National Social Sciences Fund (12XGL003), Innovation Team Project “Knowledge Chain Management” (13TD0040) and General Project of Humanities and Social Sciences (12SB342) of Education Department of Sichuan Province.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lin Luo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this paper

Cite this paper

Luo, L., Gu, X., Wei, Q., Li, H. (2017). On Interactive Learning and Mutual Trust Within the Innovation Network. In: Xu, J., Hajiyev, A., Nickel, S., Gen, M. (eds) Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Management Science and Engineering Management. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 502. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1837-4_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1837-4_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-1836-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-1837-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics