Skip to main content

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Business ((BRIEFSBUSINESS))

  • 862 Accesses

Abstract

I define an institution’s international richness according to the international diversity of the student body and the variety of international faculty it attracts onto its campus. A look at the evidence indicates that the proportion of international students and faculty rarely exceeds 20 % for most institutions around the world. I then argue that the proportion of international students in and of itself is a poor indicator of international richness if a single nationality dominates the student body. I explore the phenomenon of culture dominance and show how it creates ‘assimilation traps ,’ that is, a tendency of foreign students to try to assimilate with the culture of the dominant nationality on campus, a phenomenon that greatly reduces the cultural learning these foreign students could have transmitted to the domestic students.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Note that Exhibit 8 does not capture the percentage of foreign faculty and staff. But we could easily construct an index of international richness that combines the percentage of foreign students, faculty and staff.

  2. 2.

    Four countries had 10 % international students: Belgium, Denmark, France and the Netherlands.

  3. 3.

    The United States , however, has the largest absolute number of international students representing 17 % of all students studying abroad. See OECD [1] and Institute of International Education-Project Atlas [2].

  4. 4.

    The university with the highest enrolment of international students was Florida Institute of Technology with 33 %. Of the top US universities listed in Exhibit 1b, Carnegie Mellon University had 21 % and the figure for the other institutions varies from a low of 8 % for Stanford University to a high of 14 % at the University of California, Berkeley (see US News rankings: Most international students-National universities [3]).

  5. 5.

    See OECD [1].

References

  1. OECD (2015) Education at a glance 2015: OECD indicators. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris. doi:10.1787/eag-2015-en

    Google Scholar 

  2. Institute of International Education. http://www.iie.org/Services/Project-Atlas

  3. US News Ranking: Most international students national universities. http://colleges.usnews.rankingsandreviews.com/best-colleges/rankings/national-universities/most-international/

  4. Financial Times (2016) Global MBA ranking, January 25

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gabriel Hawawini .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hawawini, G. (2016). International Richness. In: The Internationalization of Higher Education and Business Schools. SpringerBriefs in Business. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1757-5_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics