Skip to main content

Signature Pedagogies in Global Competence Education: Understanding Quality Teaching Practice

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

How might we support young people to understand who they are in an interconnected world, prepare them to consider multiple perspectives as they collaborate with others across cultures and languages to improve conditions, and provide opportunities for them to participate positively in civic life, school, and work? Preparing students for today’s world requires not only that we think about what matters most for students to learn, but also what kind of teaching and learning will prove most effective. Building on Lee Shulman’s idea of signature pedagogies, we propose a pedagogical approach uniquely tailored to nurturing deep, relevant, and compelling global learning and a concomitant framework for developing teacher expertise. We define signature pedagogies in global education as a pervasive set of teaching practices that nurture students’ capacity and disposition to understand and act on matters of global significance. Signature pedagogies organize learners’ experience to inculcate in them hallmark global competence habits of mind: investigating the world, taking perspective, communicating across difference, and taking action. They offer students ample opportunities to engage in “junior versions” of authentic practices in relevant fields, and represent instructional tropes, paths, or motifs. Using illustrative cases at the elementary school level, we describe two types of signature pedagogies in global education: research expedition and purposeful comparisons. Research expedition pedagogy focuses on learner’s understanding and experience of a distant place – geo-physical and environmental qualities, built and natural landscapes, people and social organizations, as well as manifestations of culture in the form of taste, values, practice, relationships and beliefs – and helps them develop a sense of personal connection to it. Purposeful comparisons pedagogy builds on the premise that an individual can understand the world by examining a single phenomenon across multiple locations through the lens of a question that makes cross-case analysis necessary. It often involves creating a model or a frame that helps us distil relevant aspects of each case, identifying similarities and differences to inform our understanding. When such signature pedagogies are designed to be a regular part of the learning experience, they nurture understanding of the world and key global dispositions in learners.

What I thought, since all the movies that I saw, is that they would be more poor, that they [e-pals in South Africa] would not have a city, that their homes would be made out of dried up mud… I was really surprised because they looked nothing like that… they have a lot of the things that we do, they have video games and a city… I was really surprised…. ‘cause they have good teeth, real clothes, full hair. [Working with our South African ePals] is cool because we can talk with people from different continents… We can see how people on the other side of the world live, and what they do, not at all as I imagined it…

Richard, Grade 4 New York

The original version of this chapter was revised. An erratum to this chapter can be found at DOI 10.1007/978-981-10-1673-8_25

An erratum to this chapter can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1673-8_25

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This study was made possible by the Longview foundation. We thank Jennifer Manise for her unwavering support of this multi-year investigation and her leadership in the field of Global Education.

  2. 2.

    Teachers were awarded the Fulbright Distinguished Teacher at the US Department of State.

  3. 3.

    This definition was developed at the Council of Chief State School Officers. The Global Competence committee was led by Asia Society’s Tony Jackson. Its published articulation and exemplification was informed by research conducted by Veronica Boix Mansilla at Project Zero, Harvard Graduate School of Education.

  4. 4.

    In his book Making Learning Whole, David Perkins coined the phrase “junior versions” to describe the best ‘threshold experiences’ that provide students with opportunities to see the ‘big picture’ of the issue, topics, etc., under study.

References

  • Asia Society. (2011). Improving teacher quality around the world: The international summit on the teaching profession. New York, NY: Asia Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appleyard, N., & McLean, L. R. (2011). Expecting the exceptional: Pre-service professional development in global citizenship education. International Journal of Progressive Education, 7(2), 6–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boix Mansilla, V., & Gardner, H. (1999). What are the qualities of understanding? In M. S. Wiske (Ed.), Teaching for understanding: Linking research with practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boix Mansilla, V., & Jackson, A. (2011). Educating for global competence: Preparing our youth to engage in the world. New York: The Asia Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boix Mansilla, V., Miller, C. M., & Gardner, H. (2000). On disciplinary lenses and interdisciplinary work. In Wineburg, S., & Grossman, P. (Eds.), Interdisciplinary curriculum: Challenges to implementation. New York: Teachers College Press.*

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, J. (2006). Collapse: How societies choose to fail or succeed. New York: Penguin Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibboney, R. A. (2006). Centennial reflections: Intelligence by design: Thorndike versus Dewey. Phi Delta Kappan, 88(2), 170–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koziol, S. with J. Greenberg, Williams, L., & Neihaus, E. (2011). Implementing a systemic approach to internationalizing teacher education: A progress report (World Assembly). Glasgow: International Council on Education for Teaching.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koziol, S. (2012, September). Internationalizing your teacher education program. Paper presented at the National CAEP Conference, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lapayese, Y. V. (2003). Toward a critical global citizenship education. Comparative Education Review, 47(4), 493–501.

    Google Scholar 

  • Longview Foundation. (2008). Teacher preparation for the global age: The imperative for change. Retrieved on August 12, 2013, from www.longviewfdn.org

  • Merryfield, M. M. (1994). Teacher education in global and international education. In M. Sutton & D. Hutton (Eds.), Concepts and trends in global education. Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merryfield, M. M. (2002). The difference a global educator can make. Educational Leadership, 60(2), 18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, D. N., Tishman, S., Ritchhart, R., Donis, K., & Andrade, A. (2000). Intelligence in the wild: A dispositional view of educational traits. Educational Psychology Review, 12(3), 269–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, A. (2007). Global dimensions of schooling: Implications for internationalizing teacher education. Teacher Education Quarterly, 34(1), 9–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. (2005). Signature pedagogies in the professions. Daedalus, 134(3), 52–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sizer, T. (1984). Horace’s compromise: The dilemma of the American high school. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vainio-Mattila, A. (2009). Internationalizing curriculum: A new kind of education? New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 118, 95–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiske, M. S. (1999). What is teaching for understanding? In J. Leach & B. Moon (Eds.), Learners and pedagogy (pp. 230–246). London: Paul Chapman Publishing. In association with the Open University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, Y. (2012). World class learners: Educating creative and entrepreneurial students. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Veronica Boix Mansilla .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mansilla, V.B., Chua, F.S. (2017). Signature Pedagogies in Global Competence Education: Understanding Quality Teaching Practice. In: Choo, S., Sawch, D., Villanueva, A., Vinz, R. (eds) Educating for the 21st Century. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1673-8_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1673-8_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-1671-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-1673-8

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics