Modelling of Interactive Multivariable Systems for Control

  • Chandra Shekar Besta
  • Manickam ChidambaramEmail author
Conference paper


Higher order transfer function models are approximated by a three parameters models such as critical damped SOPTD and FOPTD models. A design method for centralized PID controllers using Tanttu and Lieslekto method for the identified critical damped Second order plus time delay (SOPTD) is proposed. Centralized PI controllers are designed by the Tanttu and Lieslekto method from the identified First order plus time delay (FOPTD) model. The Centralized SOPTD-PID control system gives enhanced main responses and lesser interactions. This improvement is shown for TITO systems having high interactions (λ11 > 1). The robustness study for the controllers is carried out by using the Inverse Maximum Singular Value versus Frequency plot for the input and output multiplicative uncertainties. Simulation results are given for one TITO system having λ11 > 1. The centralized SOPTD-PID controllers give improved results in comparison with the centralized FOPTD-PID/PI controllers.


C-SOPTD FOPTD TITO systems Centralized scheme 


  1. Bristol, E.H.: On a new measure of interaction for multivariable process. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 133–134 (1966)Google Scholar
  2. He, M.-J., Cai, W.-J., Ni, W., Xie, L.-H.: RNGA based control system configuration for multivariable processes. J. Process Control 19(6), 1036–1042 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Mc Avoy, T., Arkun, Y., Chen, R., Robinson, D., Schnelle, P.D.: A new approach to defining a dynamic relative gain. Control Eng. Pract. 11(8), 907–914 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Monshizadh-Naini, N., Fatehi, A., Khaki-Sedigh, A.: Input—Output pairing using effective relative energy array. Indian Eng. Chem. Res. 48, 7137–7144 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Morari, M., Zafiriou, E.: Robust Process Control. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey (1989)Google Scholar
  6. Ram, V.D., Chidambaram, M.: On-line controller tuning for critically damped SOPTD systems. Chem. Eng. Commun. 202, 48–58 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Rangaiah, G.P., Krishnaswamy, P.R.: Estimating second order plus dead time model parameters. Indian Eng. Chem. Res. 33(4), 1867–1871 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Rivera, D.E., Morarl, M., Skogestad, S.: Internal model control. 4. P I D controller design. Indian Eng. Chem. Res. 25, 252–265 (1986)Google Scholar
  9. Simi, S., Chidambaram, M.: Tuning of PID controllers for critically damped second order plus time delay systems. Indian Chem. Eng. 57(1), 32–51 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Sundaresan, K.R., Krishnaswamy, P.R.: Estimating of time delay constant parameters in time, frequency, and Laplace domains. Can. J. Chem. Eng. 56, 257–260 (1978)Google Scholar
  11. Tanttu, J.T., Lieslehto, J.: A comparative study of some multivariable PI controller tuning methods. In: Devanathan, R. (ed.) Intelligent Tuning and Adaptive Control, pp. 357–362. IFAC, Singapore (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Xiong, Q., Cai, W.-J., He, M.-J.: A practical loop pairing criterion for multivariable processes. J. Process Control 15(7), 741–747 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Chemical EngineeringIndian Institute of Technology MadrasMadrasIndia

Personalised recommendations